The said change in the constitution which when challenged in the SC will certainly need the constitutional bench to be reconvened to resolve the dispute.
The SC cannot refer to its earlier judgement alone, especially since the earlier ruling itself was a split decision which was passed on the slenderest of margin.
The current ruling forces India to be "secular", "socialist", "maintain political unity", "Liberty of though & expression", "sovereignty" all of which is not implementable or is not implemented.
1. Reservation based on religion and separate civil code based on religion is contrary to the ruling.
2. Private enterprise and capitalism is against socialism
3. Ceding of Kachchatheevu island to SL questions the geographical unity character, so did ceding of Coco island to Burma
3. Banning of books is against 'liberty of though and expression'
4. Existence of LOC is against the sovereignty principle.
There are many more examples that bring out the glaring loop holes in this absurd ruling and you can be sure in this age of internet and easy access to knowledge, any new constitutional bench is guaranteed to make a different ruling.