These are the array of the choices, that India can utilized, but the point is these are the ones, which we general people could think of, and not by the strategic think tanks and it answers your quotes of not having much choices.
Calm down, do you want me to refer it as Azad Kashmir means Independent Kashmir, then it is a free country of Kashmiri, and any attack on this land won't be an attack on Pakistan. LOLZ.
This post was for the response to show that Indian choices in this stages, which do not means the Indian plans.
Indians have higher fire power and their main Command HQ is far away from the border. The purpose of Indians would be to inflicts the damage to those HQ who are helping those terrorists to cross the border using cover fire and to increase the cost of the assymetric warfare, which PA is waging against India.
India could not sit arround and take the wounds for ever, under the threats of escalations, and let me clear the facts, that IA have delailed plans about the full spectrum of the consequences, and what is only needed is the Political Will.
PA right now have half of the armies indulge in zarb-e-xxx operations in FATA and Balluchistan. Indian Army will be given free hand to choose the appropriate time and the place of their choice, if this option is picked, and in the past, the PA had the element of surprise, and if this option is pick, than its the IA who will have this, and supported by IAF, if PAF decided to came in support for PA.
This option could be easily done by creating Canals, and diverting the water and deliberately changing the course of water of the river. If we back off from the agreement, then we won't be compelled to leave the 80% of water to pakistan, which could be argued as we need water for our own requirement, but will severly effect the agriculture based economy of the Pakistan, putting more strain on the Pakistani economy.
Buddy its not the Mumbai Attack, rather the OBL raid, that the perceptive of the world, specially the western ones is changing. e.g U.S tried to distinguish Talibans as good talibans for talks and bad Talibans, but we were very clear, and still stands to our narrative that, there is no good or bad terrorists, and now the world is realizing it and speaking the same tune. Look at the present conditions, despite trying hard by Nawaz about Kashmir, there is no mentioning of Kashmir, by the UN president in its speach, and could you give me the reason, why Obamma even didn't gave Nawaz 60 sec meeting in UN, and why did Nawaz refuses to answer the Media on the question of Uri and Kashmir, and your Sartaz Aziz even came out of his Car. Look at the statements of the major power of the worlds including France, Germany, UK, Russia, U.S, and the neighboring countries such as Srilanka, Bangladesh, Afghanistan condeming the terrorism, and full support to the India.
If you are in dellusion that we are trying this tactics for years, then I am sorry to say those efforts were not enough, we need to create the array of thinktanks who could use their channels and relationship to actually create the real mood, and the movement to create a single truth, that you cannot have talks and terrorism at the same time, and the epicenter of the terrorism has to be destroyed, before thinking of defeating the terrorism globally.
Agreed, but this step should have been taken way too long.
We learned this from you Janab. Care to listen to the Mushraff argument, that since Kashmir is the desputed area, so crossing LOC is not an attack on India, and when the reverse things happens, how could you deny your own generals (retired) argument and theory or Formulla.
No we were never doing. India have enough cash, resources that could be pumped via Iran and afghanistan, and giving them IGLA would make the life of PAF a living hell. Remember the destruction of your 3 Awaacs, now in the hands of terrorists these weapons would create the havocs for the landing and takeoff planes from the bases. P.S Did you know that Chinese demands to have the three tiers security fencing around the Airport they are building in Gadawar, do you know why ? because they know this practically well the threats. As far as return the favour to IOK statement of yours are concerned, you are already doing this, so what's the Big deal.
Why should we worry, we should only support the Bangladesh for logging the case, which would be slap in the face of the PA, and would only give attentions to the Balluch leaders demands and voices about the so called genocides and attrocities as the tool of the weapon of the P.A.
I think this will be eventually going to be happened, because if one country who is creating problem in the group, then it should be disbanned and say them good luck for these Arabs and turks cousins.
No that would include the recruitment of the Balluch fighters from all over the world, give them training, and provide them weapons and money. And yes we will take your example of Always Denial mode tactics. Now since many Pakistani mentioned Mukti Bahini, but we learned that from you Janab from the Kabali attack on Kashmir in 47, and now if you can see clearly we are not bad at all, because those Mukti bahini did deliver and did the job done beutifully in 1971. Jai Hind.
Why looking to the case with narrow vision. Sir, if the quick and immediate plan to hit Pakistan hard would have to be taken, that would have been taken immediately. See the operation of the Israel was activated in mere 40 minute of the attack of the Hezbollah. Lets have some faith in the countries leadership, and let the Modi show, what he can do as promised in the election, and don't expect him to deliver immediately, and give all the plans in an open media to the public.
Look at your Media, and the so called experts discussing that India is planning to do surgical strike in Pakistan. We even didn't raised our eyebrow and you declare no flyzone in P0k, and the status of your stock exchange fall steeply, will give the idea, whats happening there and now some heat is been felt though you can deny.
LOL Election is 3 years ahead, where are you learning all this.