What's new

India hints at 'Military Option' against Pakistan.

Not everyone is an idiot or a warmonger in India. Lt Gen(R) Panag feels there are zero chances of any war or major military confrontation and PA is a competent military, hence if war happens somehow, it is difficult to predict the outcome.

2d4j.png


@haviZsultan @Secur @Aeronaut @nuclearpak @Hyperion @darkinsky @Patriot @Desert Fox @DESERT FIGHTER @Abu Zolfiqar @Windjammer @Icarus @Spring Onion @Azadkashmir @PWFI @Slav Defence @Pak-one @qamar1990 @Leader @mr420 @RazPaK @Last Hope @JonAsad @Imran Khan @W-11 @HAIDER @truthseer @Pakistanisage @mafiya @ghilzai @chauvunist @Zarvan @Armstrong
 
Last edited by a moderator:
india ke awam ka rape ho raha he, pakistani awam ka rape ho raha he, dunya kahan se kahan pohonch rahe he and we have to discuss war
 
Not feasible. You can't go to war due to skirmishes. You can't carry out limited strikes with stand off weapons if your adversary can retaliate in kind. That would be counter productive.
 
@That Guy

arey dost...I meant the same...we shud not go for a war...the issue is not worth a war.

and dont tell us abt ur nukes....lol.... u do once and u r wiped off...so apne aukat mein rehana..u ve already lost all wars.. u know?

Actually, I was agreeing with you, and adding on to what you said. I only disagreed on the Indian victory. As for nuclear war, neither country would survive, so it's not even worth calling such an event a victory for one side over the other.

I would also like to point out that only the 71 war can be considered an Indian victory, and even then Bangladeshis don't agree because they think that India only took credit away from Bangladesh. If I recall, 47 was a stalemate, 67 was a UN mandated ceasefire and Kargil can't even be considered a war because of how limited in scale it was.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any military minded chap including your heads of military know that all Pakistan can do is tops sustain an assault for 7 days should a full scale conventional war break out between the two countries. apart of from sheer bluster and sheer naivety - I don't know where you guys come up with thinking you can take on India forces. hell you don't even have a navy worth squat and would run over from sea, land and air within days. that is not bluster on my end, it is reality based facts. senor sher khan...

of course you and me would not be anywhere near the fight, we will be sitting cozy in Judea Christian lands.

India’s army unfit to fight a war, army chief says

NEW DELHI — India’s tanks do not have enough shells to fire, its air defenses are obsolete and its ill-equipped infantry can’t fight at night, the country’s army chief told the prime minister in a letter this month, an Indian newpaper reported Wednesday.

India?s army unfit to fight a war, army chief says - Washington Post
 
India’s army unfit to fight a war, army chief says

NEW DELHI — India’s tanks do not have enough shells to fire, its air defenses are obsolete and its ill-equipped infantry can’t fight at night, the country’s army chief told the prime minister in a letter this month, an Indian newpaper reported Wednesday.

India?s army unfit to fight a war, army chief says - Washington Post

As if your side has the most modern air defences...we saw what happened when America fked ur dear OBL.

As much as I hate to say we need someone like Indra Gandhi. She alone had the spine to take tough decisions.
 
As if your side has the most modern air defences...we saw what happened when America fked ur dear OBL.

As much as I hate to say we need someone like Indra Gandhi. She alone had the spine to take tough decisions.


Sure, elect another such leader if you can find one :laugh:

I wonder which company will have the bragging rights of manufacturing the sole bullet needed to repeat history. Watch those turbaned body guards! :lol:
 
I scratch my balls all the time, that does not mean I'm going to have intercourse though........LOL at indian hints..... last time you let one million indian soldiers eat sun and dust on border.


India hints at retaliation against Pakistan.
Last updated 19:43 08/08/2013
REUTERS

CONFLICT: Indian Army Chief General Bikram Singh (C) salutes in front of the coffins of Indian soldiers during a wreath laying ceremony at the technical airport in Jammu in this August 7, 2013 handout photo from the Indian Ministry of Defence.

India for the first time directly accused the Pakistan army of involvement in an ambush in which five Indian soldiers were killed, and said the incident would hurt warming relations with its neighbor and hinted at possible military retaliation.

"Our restraint should not be taken for granted, nor should the capacity of our armed forces and resolve of the government to uphold the sanctity of the Line of Control ever be doubted," Defense Minister A.K. Antony told parliament on Thursday, referring to the de facto border dividing the disputed Himalayan territory of Kashmir.

"It is now clear that specialist troops of Pakistan army were involved in this attack," he said.

Pakistan has denied any involvement in Tuesday's attack, possibly the worst such incident since the two nuclear-armed rivals signed a ceasefire in 2003.

- Reuters

India Hints At Retaliation Against Pakistan | Stuff.co.nz
 
Chance of a war breaking out are next to none.

However on basis of past trends, rest assured, we will have similar number(if not more) dead Pakistani soldiers on Pakistani side, these death will not be as high profile as killing of Indian Jawans, will not get as much media coverage, might not be even a single incident.

As of now India is trying to maximize the diplomatic mileage gained from portraying an image of peace loving neighbor, who is being provoked by a rouge neighboring army.

Element of surprise is not available, as Pakistani troops are also on alert, hence launching an immediate retaliation makes little sense...let the matter cool a little..and then deliver justice upon those responsible...without drawing too much attention to yourself.
 
What a joke !! Hazar chuhe maar ke billi hajj ko chali :lol:
 
Not everyone is an idiot or a warmonger in India. Lt Gen(R) Panag feels there are zero chances of any war or major military confrontation and PA is a competent military, hence if war happens somehow, it is difficult to predict the outcome.

2d4j.png


@haviZsultan @Secur @Aeronaut @nuclearpak @Hyperion @darkinsky @Patriot @Desert Fox @DESERT FIGHTER @Abu Zolfiqar @Windjammer @Icarus @Spring Onion @Azadkashmir @PWFI @Slav Defence @Pak-one @qamar1990 @Leader @mr420 @RazPaK @Last Hope @JonAsad @Imran Khan @W-11 @HAIDER @truthseer @Pakistanisage @mafiya @ghilzai @chauvunist @Zarvan @Armstrong

they know we are a warrior race !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The crap is in your post mate, the MKI is not exactly the Rapptor of the East that Indians often gloat, it doesn't even have any battle records to show for it'self, whatever package they may fly in, the two fully armed busted weren't exactly on a goodwill visit. As for Kargil, aircraft flying within their own airspace and painting the adversary is no biggie, a flight of Fulcrums also gave a good tone to a couple of F-16s.

Oh you actually reply :P i though you would be gone without reply... like last time

- thats your understanding , i cant argue with that. ( Same lion-pig story )
You completely failed to understand what I mean. Let me try again and waist more of my time,
- Yes MKIs are not Raptors and so are the "teens"
- Even your F-16 aren't battle tested
- you think painting targets in opposite air space from your own territory is no big deal but same time you are making bug deal of paining targets in your own territory
- And I wander what you ACEs thinking when they lock MKIs ??? Why not shoot ??? It would have balanced the "Atlantic" score.
- and such incursions are just warnings of what could happen like few bombs busting Pak posts inside border,

- SOP for MKIs is heard of 5/6 for offensive missions but you wont understand that as you are happy in believing your guies made them run ;) if they stayed to fight you might have other opinions.

- BTW F-16 sorties were stopped after those painting incident and the reason given by PAF was lack of spares and high consumption of scare resources :rofl:
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom