What's new

India has dealt a killer blow to ties with Sri Lanka: Minister

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
India has dealt a killer blow to ties with Sri Lanka: Minister
The Hindu : News / International : India has dealt a killer blow to ties with Sri Lanka: Minister

After India's recent ‘unexpected' vote against Colombo at the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva, newspaper columns in Sri Lanka have contended that the relations between the two countries have touched the lowest point.

And now, a Sri Lankan Minister has joined the ranks of these columnists.

“By voting against Sri Lanka, India has not only dealt a killer blow to India-Sri Lanka relations, but also to reconciliation efforts between Sinhalese and Tamils. This in turn is akin to committing an act of diplomatic hara-kiri, as both Tamil fascism and Western imperialism — which India is attempting to protect through its actions — are the real enemies of India,” Patali Champika Ranawaka wrote in the Nation newspaper on Sunday in an article titled ‘Why India voted against Sri Lanka.' He has repeatedly made statements against India.

Days of friendship

Recalling how India stayed firmly behind Sri Lanka in the closing stages of the war in 2009, despite considerable pressure from political parties in Tamil Nadu, the Minister, who is in-charge of Electricity, said, “India's action at the UNHRC clearly has nothing to do with the threats coming from Tamil Nadu.”

It was also not motivated by India's desire to protect human rights, given its own record, he argued.

The Minister touched upon the story that indicated that Congress president Sonia Gandhi became highly distressed after seeing a picture of the body of Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam chief Prabakaran's younger son, Balachandran, but stops short of accusing her of being the deciding factor in the Indian vote going the other way.

‘Promises fulfilled'

Another English language newspaper, Lakbima News, has quoted the former Attorney General, Mohan Peiris, as saying that Sri Lanka had fulfilled all the promises that it made in 2009.

“We had a resolution in 2009; we made certain pledges in 2009 and we delivered on those pledges,” the newspaper quoted him as saying.

This, in essence, is where the contradiction lies. Both Mr. Ranawaka and Mr. Peiris — like countless others in the Sri Lankan establishment — have constantly held that Sri Lanka has delivered on the promises that it made in 2009. The United Nations, the United States, India, Great Britain and many other European powers insist that this is not true.

Sri Lanka is yet to deliver on any promise made on political autonomy, and even provincial elections have not been held in the Northern Province, a diplomat said.
 
Sri Lanka itself has to decide.

If we decide to break the Eelam away, it won't take us long, with the kind of support the 'cause' still has among Tamils in both SL and around the world.

If we see China or Pakistan gaining too much foothold in SL for our comfort, we might as well plan to see a region of 'our own' in SL....and I mean Eelam.

Make up your mind guys, and choose wisely.
 
Lankans you don't want GOI to consider its own people's wish and on other hand you are playing Chineses card ...... Do we need any expert to find the outcome ? It was obvious. India in not giving dam on Chinese claim in south china sea and you trying it in south of India ? That was a mistake. It's better for Lankan government to change stance or it's going to be same again and again
 
Welcome Sri Lanka. Pakistan and China appreciate the moves by Sri Lanka in recent years to cooperate and be friendly with it's neighbours

Sri Lanka have to decide whether they want friendly relation with India or Not.

About Sri Lanka having relation ship with Pakistan, China, Bangladesh, Nauru or Tuvalu, that none of India's fcking Business.
 
Sri Lanka is growing at above 8%+ GDP growth.

Much faster than India's 6.1% GDP growth rate.

Indeed Sri Lanka is not an unimportant neighbour, more so because of the Tamils there.

India is far likely to give Lanka far less leeway than we give to Nepal or Bhutan.

Simply because Lanka is a very important neighbour.


...and that is all the more reason for Lanka to behave.

Lanka must take care not to pi$$ India off beyond a certain extent.
 
Lankan GDP sunk in war time. So 8% growth isn't actual growth it's makeup of the lost growth. The real growth rate will be after 2012 after everything is settled. Hope it can maintain 8%

BTW educate yourself about growth rate of India. And I mean of economic year not of a quadrant.
 
Do you really think Sri lanka and India are comparable.

Absolutely NO!

Sri Lanka itself has to decide.

If we decide to break the Eelam away, it won't take us long, with the kind of support the 'cause' still has among Tamils in both SL and around the world.

If we see China or Pakistan gaining too much foothold in SL for our comfort, we might as well plan to see a region of 'our own' in SL....and I mean Eelam.

Make up your mind guys, and choose wisely.

Do u have any idea about so called "eelam" and the percentage of Tamils living in Northern province and the percentage of Eastern province and other provinces?
 
Back
Top Bottom