M. Sarmad
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2013
- Messages
- 7,022
- Reaction score
- 62
- Country
- Location
This has been a trend forever. But it is not as simple as our dear friends across the border think.
3. The article states the voting has been dismal in Kashmir. That is incorrect and very prejudiced
Bijoyeta Das (The writer of this article) is a journalist and photographer. She has reported from Bangladesh, India, Nepal, the Philippines, Thailand, Turkey, South Korea and USA and holds a masters degree in Journalism from Northeastern University, USA and a photojournalism postgraduate diploma from Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines.
Why would she hold some kind of prejudice against the Indian state and a soft corner for Pakistan or militants/extremists... ??
1. Anantnag(unofficially called Islamabad by local secular people) for example has always seen extreme violence on the eve of poll. The poll official and many other security people were killed. All sarpanchs, officials etc were threatened. In this situation there is little chance of people coming out to vote. Then there is peer pressure. Many in my district consider vote as a Hindu exercise!
2. People now believe in absolute Islamism in Anantnag, Srinagar, Sopore, etc. Elections hence are of relatively lesser importance. As a result almost all Hindus, Sikhs, most Shias have left these places to Udhampur and Jammu. The last Sufi shrine was blown up last year - so much for the Sufi culture of Kashmir. It is aptly put by the statement - "Habibullah, who refused to give his full name, said, "Only Islamic rule can solve Kashmir's problem"."
The situation is really alarming then .......... Bad for India
5. All said, I admit that people of Anantnag and Ganderbal generally have little love for Hindus and India. There is only one demand that dominates the political scenario -Greater Islamization
The same mindset is prevalent here ... "Only Islam can solve all our problems" ... So this naturally draws them closer to Pakistan ; An Islamic Republic .......
6. Ultimately it boils down to a simple fact - relativism. For me, a minority, India is the only hope for survival.
And what about the majority ? You can`t keep killing them like this for ever .. or can you ?
1. Bangalore recorded 34% of votes. By that logic it wants to secede from India.
2. Yaar, you don't understand. The security is only temporary - they leave after the elections are over. The people who vote get MARKED FOR EVER! Even after I voted I left for Udhampur because Anantnag(you called it Islamabad, its not renamed officially)was declared hypersensitive. A number of poll officials were attacked, some killed etc. Peaceful people boycotting elections don't do that.
3. Poll boycott is nothing new. It is done all over India to protest against issues. Such things have happened all over the country.
4. As for Indian Army forcing the elections - the media is present, hence it is impossible for that to happen. In fact the Indian Army is not even deployed for the elections. The CRPF is.
A low election turnout is not the only thing pointing towards what Kashmiris want ... Your own post tells the whole story .. Do you deny that IA has been involved in serious human rights violation in Kashmir ?