What's new

India does hard talk, warns Pak of consequences for shelling

this India aggression is definitely related to the china investment in pak. after all modi did not bring tesla home.
 
.
dont bother about that ****. he always talk shit on this forum because he got 1 small peepee :lol:

y not india and pakistan get international observors 2 watch who causing crap by firing 1st. india always saying pakistan fire 1st and pakistan say india does. best 2 get some observors who can say who fire first
Yaar there are observers from UN, they are like caged birds :cheesy: why should public die? The problem is pak rangers want mujahedeen pushed in to Kashmir, BSF says this is wrong, the problem arises here, Both the countries get nothing from this, we feel sad if common people die, they have nothing to do with politics
 
.
Pakistan Rangers DG calls BSF chief, urges end to firing | Deccan Chronicle

Amidst a spurt in ceasefire violations along the Indo- Pakistan International Border (IB) in Jammu and Kashmir, the chief of Pakistan Rangers called up BSF DG DK Pathak urging the Indian side to stop its retaliatory firing.

Sources said that Rangers Director General Maj. Gen. Umar Farooq Burki told the BSF chief that they have suffered "very heavy" damage because of the BSF response and urged the border guarding force to stop its firing.


Rubbish from the Indian press, "sources said" I'm sure they did.

The meeting was mutually called for. Not some admission of being destroyed and then coming to the table.
 
.
India is a promoter of terrorism ... Terrorism inside india and outside is a state policy of india .... You grow and harvest terrorism
 
.
Rubbish from the Indian press. The meeting was mutually called for. Not some admission of being destroyed and then coming to the table.

The question is why did Pakistan Rangers agree to stop the shelling
since they had started it

We never start ;we only retaliate

Pakistan Rangers always TEST the men and material on the other side

After one month of calm ; what was the need to start firing

But the quick and decisive response ( 5 shells for ONE ) made the Pakistan rangers
stop the firing
 
. . .
It is funny you take our diplomacy at UN as some sort of surrender or victory. Well guess what many Indian soldiers died during same period when we were raising your ceasefire violations at UN. Still claiming victory?? :lol:



And you more of this if you continue with violations. :lol:

shaheed-23.jpg
OK iron man you people cannot die, as we people are human we laugh, cry, fight , win , die. See the dead are respected in our country, but your country refuses to take back your martyers, what a shame.
 
.
OK iron man you people cannot die, as we people are human we laugh, cry, fight , win , die. See the dead are respected in our country, but your country refuses to take back your martyers, what a shame.

Whatever kid. control your supa puwa delusions and don't violate ceasefire and it would be peace on border again.
 
.
Pakistan Rangers DG calls BSF chief, urges end to firing | Deccan Chronicle

Amidst a spurt in ceasefire violations along the Indo- Pakistan International Border (IB) in Jammu and Kashmir, the chief of Pakistan Rangers called up BSF DG DK Pathak urging the Indian side to stop its retaliatory firing.

Sources said that Rangers Director General Maj. Gen. Umar Farooq Burki told the BSF chief that they have suffered "very heavy" damage because of the BSF response and urged the border guarding force to stop its firing.
Sources? Indian I believe?
End of the story...! :rofl:
 
.
It is funny you take our diplomacy at UN as some sort of surrender or victory. Well guess what many Indian soldiers died during same period when we were raising your ceasefire violations at UN. Still claiming victory?? :lol:



And you more of this if you continue with violations. :lol:

shaheed-23.jpg

If you get perverse pleasure in counting body bags.

1 ) We can assure we killed more Pakistanis than you did Indians, in some case twice as many.

2) What diplomacy ?! It was plane and simple crying. first to Americans and as they showed you the door. Then to UNSC.

3)What was result of your diplomacy? Did UNSC issue a statement/ pass a resolution condemning Indian ceasefire violations. They didn't even bother discussing the matter. That is the extent of Pakistan's diplomatic prowess.
 
.
The question is why did Pakistan Rangers agree to stop the shelling
since they had started it

We never start ;we only retaliate

Pakistan Rangers always TEST the men and material on the other side

After one month of calm ; what was the need to start firing

But the quick and decisive response ( 5 shells for ONE ) made the Pakistan rangers
stop the firing
Yes you are saint..and BSF is mightiest force of the world..!

I am not sure why these super power Indians need a feel good news about their Impotent forces after a month or two and that too the sources are only few Indian papers...Fuckin' losers..!
 
.
If you get perverse pleasure in counting body bags.

1 ) We can assure we killed more Pakistanis than you did Indians, in some case twice as many.

Yeah you killed more civilians. We killed more of your soldiers.

2) What diplomacy ?! It was plane and simple crying. first to Americans and as they showed you the door. Then to UNSC.

That's what you think to satisfy your supa puwa dreams. Did firing stopped from our side after so called crying at UN? Dozens and dozens of firing incidents happened after this so called crying thing.

3)What was result of your diplomacy? Did UNSC issue a statement/ pass a resolution condemning Indian ceasefire violations. They didn't even bother discussing the matter. That is the extent of Pakistan's diplomatic prowess.

Doesn't matter. UN is a useless organization anyways. But since our representative is there so he would continue to raise your violations while we respond you on the border itself.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom