What's new

India does hard talk, warns Pak of consequences for shelling

The question is why did Pakistan Rangers agree to stop the shelling
since they had started it

We never start ;we only retaliate

Pakistan Rangers always TEST the men and material on the other side

After one month of calm ; what was the need to start firing

But the quick and decisive response ( 5 shells for ONE ) made the Pakistan rangers
stop the firing

Why did they stop? To create a climate for talking, something which has been done for years among foes.
The Pakistani rangers respond.
There was no effective response, the whole 5 shells for one resulted in further Indian casualties. Our side has significantly upped the firepower as well.
 
.
Yeah you killed more civilians. We killed more of your soldiers.



That's what you think to satisfy your supa puwa dreams. Did firing stopped from our side after so called crying at UN? Dozens and dozens of firing incidents happened after this so called crying thing.



Doesn't matter. UN is a useless organization anyways. But since our representative is there so he would continue to raise your violations while we respond you on the border itself.

Thats why BSF is warning you here, you violate the cease and when BSF hits backs, you shed big tears in front Americans, pretending to be the victims.

But unfortunately for you no one in the world is fooled by your charade. That is why, you word carries so little weight in international arena.

All this time innocent people( more on your side) keep loosing their lives.
 
. .
Thats why BSF is warning you here, you violate the cease and when BSF hits backs, you shed big tears in front Americans, pretending to be the victims.

But unfortunately for you no one in the world is fooled by your charade. That is why, you word carries so little weight in international arena.

All this time innocent people( more on your side) keep loosing their lives.

We can pretend anything we want to. That is diplomacy. You can take it as victory. Ground reality is different from wha you kids claim. We would continue to respond to your provocations. We might not hit civilians like you do. that is cowardly. But we would hit your soldiers.

And don't lecture us about international arena. We don't have delusions of supa puwa like you. We have relations with all the major countries of the world despite Indian bogus claims of isolation.
 
.
yes, we do that so when we shoot back, you dont cry like you do always

Write comprehendible language. Cant make out what you trying to convey . If English is not your forte, then write in Urdu.

We can pretend anything we want to. That is diplomacy. You can take it as victory. Ground reality is different from wha you kids claim. We would continue to respond to your provocations. We might not hit civilians like you do. that is cowardly. But we would hit your soldiers.

And don't lecture us about international arena. We don't have delusions of supa puwa like you. We have relations with all the major countries of the world despite Indian bogus claims of isolation.

You belief that you are smart and every one else is a fool, and hence you can 'pretend' and fool everyone, is probably why, no one gives a $hit, when you cry.

Give up this facade of not killing civilians, you kill/injure plenty of Kashmiri civilians.
Even yesterday you hit two of our civilians and then we responded and got 6 of yours.
 
.
You belief that you are smart and every one else is a fool, and hence you can 'pretend' and fool everyone, is probably why, no one gives a $hit, when you cry.

Give up this facade of not killing civilians, you kill/injure plenty of Kashmiri civilians.
Even yesterday you hit two of our civilians and then we responded and got 6 of yours.

Stop telling us what we are doing. We know what we are doing. And would continue to do so in the future too.

As for civilian deaths. We don't count civilian deaths. But officially there was 1 casualty on your side and at most 3 casualties from our side. Now go beat your chest on killing civilians somewhere else.
 
. .
What does a cow do when you kick it in the udders? It "mooo, mooo and mooose" There you have your hard talk.

Warning: Only if it comes with millions of Bengali's* do you need to worry. Other than that "safe".

* Think 1971 Bengali Mukhti Bahini

Billions of these - No problem

images

but in tandem with millions of these - Big problem. Time to run.

200px-Lungi_44.jpg
Mate you have REALLY LOST IT

Your posts reveal a DEEP psychosis
 
.
Mate you have REALLY LOST IT

Yes, I have lost all respect for India.

Your posts reveal a DEEP psychosis

Wow your smart. I was diagnosed with "deep psychosis" with bipolar disorder and a viceral hatred for all things Indian. I was narrowly beaten by Ajmal Kasab as he was tested and shown to be more motivated then me or else it would been me in Mumbai.

And now go and offer your free services in Mooland as a shrink.
 
. . .
Basically! I do that too or I come on and push people's buttons on the forum :D
Do tag me on such threads next time where Pakistani and Indian men troll each other. I am amazed at the depth of discussion here...it's probably in millimetres. :girl_wacko:
 
.
Do tag me on such threads next time where Pakistani and Indian men troll each other. I am amazed at the depth of discussion here...it's probably in millimetres. :girl_wacko:
:lol: still more depth than our official state level cross border talks by our governments haha

Of course, girl I got you :p:
 
.
When I am in a mood to read jokes I visit such threads.

I am glad you find homour here. I do hope I am contributing and NOT spoiling your fun.

@Stephen Cohen I have concluded that India is a threat and will remain a threat to Pakistan. In addition I would prefer it that way. More hatred means a more fortified Radcliffe Line. A more fortfied Radclife Line means undoing of the short shared history we had with you guys. The longer this "wall" stays intact the more chance of Pakistan looking west and developing linkages with our natural brothers on the western borders.

Thus my sharp, short, shrift and undiplomatic posts against India. My mission to add to the sum of hatred not reduce it. As I said more hatred more fortification. Of course I have no personal issues with any Indian and @levina can I hope confirm that.

To put it simply I don't want any form or semblance of British Raj being resurrected which would be Radcliffe Line went "soft". If that makes me mad so be it. I have no qualms.
 
.
Of course I have no personal issues with any Indian and @levina can I hope confirm that.
I'm sure the Indian and Pakistani soldiers firing at each other also do not have any personal reasons to do so.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom