Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mistake is urs. It was u all who voted Congress to Power where a top economist is treated as a puupet and some waitress and her useless, qualificationless, resultless son is been made PM of this country.
Congress has always tried to keep ppl poor so that they can be scared in name of caste, creed n religion.
It was Vajpayee govt that with its swift policies cleared all development projects which the Congress encashed and looted ppl with so many scams.
We all r responsible. No point crying now
Microsoft Hyderabad India Development Office
^^^
As a non-Indian, I'm opinionated on this issue.
- First, Dr. Subramaniam Swamy, clearly states that India should be thankfull that Ox-Cam type Dr. Singh didn't resign. The greater risk was being that India might have ended up with someone much worse. US Vs. UK school of thought between Dr. Swamy's Harvard type shadow finance minister narrative Vs. Oxford-Cambridge type Dr. Singh.
- Second, in the mold of PV Narashimha Rao, there is strong merit in politics, specially Indian politics, about the old adage of silence being golden. Humility, even to the extent of deference, is in a class of it's own. Don't forget they don't hand-out Ph.D's in Oxford and Cambridge for peanuts. This is my point.
- Third & final, The chaotic, dynastic, criminalised zoo that passes off as democracy in India, and democracy it is, demands unique leadership skills. A consensus candidate may have to be all sort of things to all interest groups. A fine balance. I, coming around to Dr. Swamy's view, credit Dr. Singh of pulling his terms off notwithstanding the odds against him. Often at the cost of private, personal and professional reputation.
^^^
Modi is the man of the hr., yet I say Dr. Subramaniam Swamy's words have merit:
- First, Dr. Swamy clearly states that India should be thankfull that Dr. Singh didn't resign. The greater risk being India ending up with worse. US Vs. UK school of thought between Dr. Swamy's Harvard type shadow finance minister role Vs. Oxford-Cambridge type Dr. Singh narrative .
- Second, in the mold of PV 'Narasingh/Narasimha' Rao (Narasimha = Nar+Singh = the real Mr. Singh), projecting simplicity is the bedrock of Indian politics. Humility, even to the extent of deference, is in a class of it's own. However, nobody ever said Ox-Cam Dons were simple. This is my point. They don't hand-out Ph.D's in Ox-Cam for peanuts.
- Third & final, the chaotic, dynastic, criminalised zoo that passes off as democracy in India, demands out-of-the-box leadership skills. A consensus candidate may have to be all sort of things to all interest groups. A fine balance. I, coming around to Dr. Swamy's view, credit Dr. Singh of pulling off his terms notwithstanding the odds against him. Often at the cost of private, personal and professional reputation.