DESERT FIGHTER
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2010
- Messages
- 46,973
- Reaction score
- 95
- Country
- Location
arre bhai jaan so jao warna IAF ajayegi
tension na lay janu bhai k pass apna dasti MANPAD hai...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
arre bhai jaan so jao warna IAF ajayegi
tension na lay janu bhai k pass apna dasti MANPAD hai...
US ka diya hua hoga
Show him your manpad or you don't have any.tension na lay janu bhai k pass apna dasti MANPAD hai...
Nahin pure Pakistani hai ANZA MKIII... Tujay US ka pasand hai?
US ka diya hua hoga
Seriously guys, are you that immature?
It is good the IAF is this alert. Any UFO needs to be identified and a response needs to be given. You gyus try to mock the high-levels of preparedness the IAF clearly maintain? Considering that over the past few years there have been numerous intel inputs of jihadis launching micro-light suicide attacks in India, it makes sense to check these things out right?
Please stop trying to pass yourself off as someone who know what he is talking about.
In radar detection, a 'false alarm' is a statistical event. If the system marked a return as a valid target, whatever it is passed the constant false alarm rate (CFAR) criteria. In this event, the individual birds were never detected so as discrete components, each bird would never reach the threshold in order to enter the CFAR algorithm.
Please, don't quote wiki when you're pasting technical stuffs from internet. It's banned by real technical guys.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant_false_alarm_rate]Constant false alarm rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
All echoes must pass through the CFAR filter.
The system was designed, as most do, to consider individual birds as part of background clutter. But when there are enough of them and if they fly close enough in order for their individual reflections to interact -- constructive interference -- the sum of these interactions will pass the CFAR threshold, meaning the mass/flock will not be consider an anomaly from background but as a valid return.
At the operator level, what constitute a 'false alarm' depends on the recognition protocols enacted by the organization. At this level, how a target behaves to mark it as a man-made object or something of nature depends on experience and records, and in order for a target to be opined by an operator as nature made its behavior must be consistent with what was observed before.
Flocks of birds rapidly changing directions have been VISUALLY mistaken as UFOs before.
Try this...
caelestia.be/birds.html]CAELESTIA Birds
It would be no different on a radar scope. If a target exhibits flight behaviors consistent with the profile of a slow moving aircraft, there is no way the operator would know that he is looking at a flock of birds.
/abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=4438277]Bug-Spotting Radar Saves Aircraft From Bird Strikes - ABC News
As highlighted, such pulses are discernible only if the individual birds are sufficiently spaced apart while flying in formation, large birds like pelicans or the smaller gulls will, but with certain smaller species like martin or sparrow, the birds will so quickly gathered that no discrete pulses will be produced for long.
I never laughed at Indians. "Laugh at Indians" was spoken by you only.I know you are desperate to laugh at the Indians, but be intellectually honest enough to admit that you do not know what you are talking about. Until more information with sufficient technical details come out to say otherwise, I stand by my opinion that this is a valid response.
Yes, I do. From a combined military and civilian experience of nearly 19 yrs in aviation.Do you really know what you are talking about?
There we have it, folks. Typical of the Chinese and their suck-ups. If an explanation is more than two paragraphs long, it throws their brains into a protective infinite loop, shutting out any information that will contradict their made up minds about any subject, especially those subjects that they have no experience.BTW, why is your post always so long? Not everyone have such plenty time to read.
In May 1997, an Indian Air Force Mikoyan MiG-25RB reconnaissance aircraft created a
furor when the pilot flew faster than Mach 2
over Pakistani territory following a
reconnaissance mission into Pakistan airspace.
The MiG-25 broke the sound barrier while
flying at an altitude of around 65,000 feet, otherwise the mission would have remained
covert, at least to the general public. The
Pakistan Government considered the breaking
of the sound barrier was deliberate to make
the point that the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) had
no aircraft in its inventory which can come close to the MiG-25's cruising altitude (up to
74,000 feet). India denied the incident but
Pakistan's Foreign Minister, Gohar Ayub Khan,
believed that the Foxbat photographed
strategic installations near the capital, Islamabad
However, from one of PAF's Forward Operating
Bases, radar traced the intruder and the F-16As
scrambled. Sources in the PAF said that there was
no need to intercept a plane flying at the altitude
of 65,000 feet as the F-16 can reach an operating
ceiling of 55,000 feet.
Really? Or just a last chain technician doing the maintenance, like washing and pumping the fuel?Yes, I do. From a combined military and civilian experience of nearly 19 yrs in aviation.
There we have it, folks. Typical of the Chinese and their suck-ups. If an explanation is more than two paragraphs long, it throws their brains into a protective infinite loop, shutting out any information that will contradict their made up minds about any subject, especially those subjects that they have no experience.
have you ever heard of RB-57F which Pakistan used for the purpose of strategic reconnaissance over Indian air space as early as 60s, it had a service ceiling of 80,000+ ft, & you need to educate yourself PAF have flown F-16 over 60,000+ ft ....
Another wanna be proud of Made in Pakistan.... LeT...may b they were kabotaars flown by LeT to provide support to jihad in kashmir ...
Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...-birds-pakistani-drones-12.html#ixzz2iQu4kwOs