What's new

India could strike Pakistan with nuclear weapons first to pre-empt attack

Well 1st level of ABM is ready to deployed or might be deployed , who knows , S400 System ?

Ever heard iron Dome? most difficult thing to hit is unguided rocket. when those rockets cant be hit, Missile is easy.

ABM only reduced the no of incoming missile, After 1st strike by India , PAK would have very few missile left to fire and ABM will take care of it.

way above your knowledge level, ABM only fails if large number of missile salvo launched .
HEY iron dome man! they r using iron dome against most simple rockets which are 800 usd to be produce. And iron dome costs around 30k each. 66% hit rate. it will fail further if those rockets are more modern.
 
Hahahaha 900 millions Hindua... Hahahahahahaha

lol , best of luck dear ....

HEY iron dome man! they r using iron dome against most simple rockets which are 800 usd to be produce. And iron dome costs around 30k each. 66% hit rate. it will fail further if those rockets are more modern.
lol, IRON dome has 100% successful rate dude, which world you are living in. yes for Israeli life is more precious.

iron dome only target those which will fall in populous area and left those which falling into empty fields.

IRON Dome tell you what? Technology to hit and stop anything....
 
OH great than why u r not attacking pakistan right now? U have no fear ur Brahmmos and ABM can take care of Pakistani nuclear weapons or might even china? correct me if i m wrong?
Why not US attacking North Korea?Why not Israel attacking Palestine?Why not Iran attacking Saudis?Why not China attacking Japan?
Having ICBM or cruise doesn't give you right to penetrate any country...
 
lol , best of luck dear ....


lol, IRON dome has 100% successful rate dude, which world you are living in. yes for Israeli life is more precious.

iron dome only target those which will fall in populous area and left those when fall into empty fields.

IRON Dome tell you what? Technology to hit and stop anything....
NOPE no missile defense has 100% success rate never forget the hizbullah vs Israel war in 2006.
 
NOPE no missile defense has 100% success rate never forget the hizbullah vs Israel war in 2006.
from which world you came from ? ID was made n deployed in 2011 ........man you one of those ppl , who don't have any knowledge and dreams of becoming superman.....
 
Why not US attacking North Korea?Why not Israel attacking Palestine?Why not Iran attacking Saudis?Why not China attacking Japan?
Having ICBM or cruise doesn't give you right to penetrate any country...
Let me correct u my brother its not right! its call fear! US has no fear about Iraq or Afghanistan? look what they have done? M not talking u Indians r weak, m talking u mast be smart enough to avoid nuclear war with Pakistan m i right?
 
All their Elites have lots of Property

The Military too has Lots of REAL estate holdings

They are not suicidal ; they dont want any escalation
They can even have property on mars by going through the level of corrupt they are..If even considered there is a war they can bring extent of havoc inside of India but they are more worried about what will happen next..They can only turn on their periodic radio of giving threat..
Even I think even China will not even get directly get involved in any offensive mode during any India Pakistan future war.They will be left all alone..
 
from which world you came from ? ID was made n deployed in 2011 ........man you one of those ppl , who don't have any knowledge and dreams of becoming superman.....
Oh ! go and google? in march 2012 300 rocket fired on Israel and 177 fell on Israel. hit 56 were intercepted. no m not dreaming! i just want u to wake up, India could be a super power but not in ur dream right now, it will take so many years.
 
Oh ! go and google? in march 2012 300 rocket fired on Israel and 177 fell on Israel. hit 56 were intercepted.
please don't quote me...... on 9 March 2012, more than 300 rockets were fired on Israel. Some 177 fell on Israeli territory. The Iron Dome system had successfully intercepted at least 56 rockets (directed at population centers) in 71 attempts.

it only intercept which will fall in population centres and not which going to fall on empty fields..... Next time use your own brain.
 
please don't quote me...... on 9 March 2012, more than 300 rockets were fired on Israel. Some 177 fell on Israeli territory. The Iron Dome system had successfully intercepted at least 56 rockets (directed at population centers) in 71 attempts.

it only intercept which will fall in population centres and not which going to fall on empty fields..... Next time use your own brain.
SO why not u r taking about kill rate? is it 100? and what types of rocket do they intercept? those 800 usd toy?

SO why not u r taking about kill rate? is it 100? and what types of rocket do they intercept? those 800 usd toy?
I think India is going to buy ID and u r believing ID has a 100 kill rate? use ur brain for there marketing they will say. Dont forget about ur su 30 jets or aircraft carrier deals. U have paid much in those things .
 
SO why not u r taking about kill rate? is it 100? and what types of rocket do they intercept? those 800 usd toy?
Mr intelligent, those things hard to hit, mortar / rocket shells are more harder to hit then missiles., now you wonder what id different between missile and rockets / mortar shells etc.

when you make one, u will know the difference.
 
Mr intelligent, those things hard to hit, mortar / rocket shells are more harder to hit then missiles., now you wonder what id different between missile and rockets / mortar shells etc.

when you make one, u will know the difference.
yeah mr perfect, and now Israel is working on iron beam. laser based missile defense system.
 
Mr intelligent, those things hard to hit, mortar / rocket shells are more harder to hit then missiles., now you wonder what id different between missile and rockets / mortar shells etc.

when you make one, u will know the difference.
Who told you that?
 
US gun knowledge is far less then what CIA has, Even CIA didn't know much about Indian nuke program, forget about US Gen of which India didn't even come under his Area of report.

In Short, the US Gen you quoting even didn't get briefing on India by its own Army/CIA.

US general will not get briefing from CIA and he is just pissing in the air and CIA didn't know much either YET Pakistan officially warned the Americans a weak before Indian test about Indian intentions. In nutshell Pakistan know more about Indian program then yanks. Is it sheer stupidity or your silly nationalism which is making you look like a complete idiot here?

It seems you are Gen Zinni right side testicle. Other then that, I can't find any logic to your verbal diaherra.

I am still waiting for patent No , ? didn't you know your own Patent No ? When you find your super duper technology patent no , do let me know

PAK always has the habit of crying wolf , but when real wolf comes , no one care. Despite notice it failed to detect. PAK only crying about it because Indian govt made it intention cleared.

Same PAK also claimed Israeli F-16 In India trying to bomb PAK nuke test site. but forget to tell the world that how f-16 travel from other part of world.


https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&s...Ulg-CKPFD5HWLNTVQ&sig2=vUbkoMnqakntO9-tpXNuqQ

P4-type: Western intelligence data suggest that Pakistan developed an ad-
vanced centrifuge in the mid-1980s.
Accordingly, this machine is based on a
Durch Urenco design, designated SLM, later known as the TC-10.22 Report-
edly, the rotor has a diameter of 14.5 cm, a length of 3.2 m, and is operated
at 508 m/s. The separative performance of the P-4 has been quoted as 21
SWU/yr.

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/rdenever/PPA%20730-11/Albright%20and%20Hinderstein.pdf&ved=0ahUKEwiytMuTh-vSAhVGAsAKHZzzD-0QFggdMAE&usg=AFQjCNFMltADDC1T-NDJaAufVhkWR_6BEA&sig2=k7pL_Uq-AyQh2RgTd-MdnQ

However, inspectors noticed that someone modified the design in distinctive
ways. In addition, the original drawings were shown to inspectors, and their
labels are in English, not Dutch or German. According to intelligence
information, the design resembles one built by Pakistan in the 1980s and
early 1990s that is sometimes called the P1.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.hi...sanjani/story-FUUGESDD5UTOINUxuq0HwN_amp.html

Former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has lifted the lid on Pakistan’s role in the development of Iran’s nuclear programme, saying Pakistan provided designs and technology, including 4,000 used centrifuges for enriching uranium.




We fuking build the damn new generation centrifuges, we setup another state (Iran) nuke proragme with our own albeit used centrifuges, we been churning fissile material since 80s, hell we make and design the machines which produce weapon grade fissile material, and here we are, a random Indian trolls coming up with silly arguments. We don't go about stealing plutonium from IAEA safeguarded Canadian reactor and blow it up in some random desert and call it "smiling buddha".

HA HA HA


What are you on about we didn't know? Hell we pre warned yanks about Indians designs a week before. How can they not know? Lol. The subsequent American behaviour after Indian test actually solidify Pakistani suspicions that India had American blessings and the devices tested were actually Israeli. This also explained the American patronage India received and still receiving in coming years during and after Clinton presidency.

Isreali F16s reaching India, not a rocket science is it? American refuller fly all along, then you got diago garcia in Indian ocean. Guess difficult to understand by punny Indian mind.

if you don't know have knowledge , their is something called reactor capacity. Indian has 20+ Nuke rectors working , against your 4 nuke rectors. Now even Nursery Failed can do maths... But you Cant..? hats off man.....

Read above Suunyboy.

In your 20+ so called reactors, how many are outside IAEA? Please enlighten us.

"Don't revive a settled matter" - Confucius

Aziz Arkadashim!! Didn't the matter already settle when Rahmetli Zia-ul Hak paid a short "cricket sports" visit to late Rajiv Gandhi in the 80s?? He said "Innalillahi Ve Innailahi Rajeun (verily we belong to Allah and shall return to HIM)". And, the best of the Indian Brahmin and Parsi folks, themselves descendents of Aryans and worked in the Muslim Sultans' courts, with the world-class style and substance understood it perfectly. The Sunderji doctrine was put back to the shelf!!! Now, do these Dravidian folks also have something else to add????

Couldn't have narrated it better myself.

You have already started assuming.Then we can also say your most techs are stolen blueprint(Thanks to AQ Khan) & mostly Chinese mercy.Going by the level your infrastructure,R&D & the level of mind your universities produce you couldn't even have had own nuclear program without mercy of others..:lol:

We are now making own reactors..First make one for yourself at least then boast..:D

You were asking for our enrichment programs.So let's see when our production has been started.....

India's uranium enrichment program in the Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) was started to begin operations in 1985.

Weapon-grade plutonium production has been produced in two reactors: the 40 MWt CIRUS and the 100 MWt Dhruva, both located in the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) complex near Mumbai & started production in 1985.

Let's get into clearing your confusion-----

The assumption in all those English articles you have posted are in context of data released by ISIS on August 2015.At that time Pakistan used to operate four plutonium production reactors,India operated one. By going through that production rate Pakistan had the capability to produce perhaps 20 nuclear warheads annually,India had about five warheads annually...

Now on 2017 India has 21 reactors active in 7 power plants & more is going to come in 2017...

Lack of availability of Uranium had limited our stockpiles.We use most of those HEU for research purpose & powering submarine.So we have to import more from other countries.This is the reason now we are moving towards Plutonium.Plutonium is in most respects more desirable than HEU as a material for nuclear weapons, given that less of it is required for an equivalently powerful fission bomb, which makes plutonium warheads lighter and more suitable for delivery by ballistic missile.India has a larger stockpile of plutonium than Pakistan & has been producing at 30 times more in amount than Pakistan annually.


The Fissile Materials Organisation data now shows India as producing 3.2 tonnes of 'weapons grade' HEU and 5.7 tonnes of non-civilian plutonium annually. The same source gives the estimate of Pakistan’s fissile production at 3.1 tonnes of HEU and 0.19 tonnes of plutonium.

Also India is currently constructing a secret Nuclear City in the state of Karnataka to produce thermonuclear weapons. It is expected to be completed by 2017, becoming the subcontinent’s largest complex of nuclear centrifuges. This will help India to get an extra stockpile of enriched uranium fuel that could be used in new hydrogen bombs, significantly increasing the explosive force of those in its existing nuclear arsenal.Will further enlarge thermonuclear program..


Also we will continue getting fissile materials(Mostly enriched Uranium) from Australia,Canada.Also have civil nuclear agreement with those countries along with UK,Japan.Mind it we are no member of NSG.:)

So lots of things are going on under the shed.So you should do a check out after 10 years...

http://www.claws.in/1438/pakistans-assertion-india-can-produce-2000-nuclear-warheads-s-b-rai.html


https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/indi...o-pre-empt-attack.484749/page-13#post-9316196

This was the reply to another Indian troll. This will cover you as well. Read and weap.
 
The point of nuclear weapons, especially against another nuclear power, is to use them before the other one gets a chance to use theirs. No point going second in a nuclear exchange, there is no second. Only the losers spot.

So it seems it is all or nothing for both sides, nothing but mutual assured destruction.
 
Back
Top Bottom