What's new

India can’t defeat Pakistan or China in war

Can you just leave US alone, the confrontation in this region is between China, Pakistan and India, 3 countries.
There Never be Two front War I grantee you if China increase its hegemony it will Open multiple fronts in South East Asia itself

Taiwan next Door ??
 
. .
Seriously Pakistanis only think world revolve around them People fight their Wars It Hilarious what they fed with


Don't you, themselves claiming that they are invincible... day dreaming..
 
. . .
you Wish Israel Relation With US is as Strong as UK since its inception Let there be another six day war you will get My point
There won't be a war like that ever, it was deception, and the Arabs are best players and masters of it if it comes to that, the 1973 war proves it.. First it was UK and France supporting Usrael, that was handed to the US in 60's.. the world has changed dramatically since the 60's, you should wakeup to the new realities.. everyone has satellites now, AWACS and early warning radars, plus mobile air defences.. you are right only when you say that the US can take on any third world country that lacks modern defense systems.. and neither China nor Pakistan are one of them..
 
. .
So you are trying to tell me that India can defeat China and Pakistan?

You should be naive to think that in an event of war if it is Pakistan+China, India will be left all alone ?? :p:

Try again my friend.

Overseas territories and colonies don't count.
But those who did surrender does count, right mate ?? :p:
 
.
There won't be a war like that ever, it was deception, and the Arabs are best players and masters of it if it comes to that, the 1973 war proves it.. First it was UK and France supporting Usrael, that was handed to the US in 60's.. the world has changed dramatically since the 60's, you should wakeup to the new realities.. everyone has satellites now, AWACS and early warning radars, plus mobile air defences.. you are right only when you say that the US can take on any third world country that lacks modern defense systems..
Do you think US will go conventional to take third world country what if he uses nukes

Lets say to take you Pakistan USA launches series of Nuclear capable missiles what next you know result of that

US has infinite caliber of weapons only two states who can took its wrath our Russians and Chinese

Its happened in WW2 when population was bombed so its not hypothetical situation
 
.
You should be naive to think that in an event of war if it is Pakistan+China, India will be left all alone ?? :p:
Who do you really think will help? US is good at bullying small countries( without much success), taking on China? They will wet their pants.
 
.
Let me share this post again:

India has a significant advantage in a defensive war with China, unless the Chinese have 8:1 numerical superiority like in 1962(a ratio which now they won't be able to replicate) Chinese offensive will stall in few days.

PLA’s war wherewithal on the Indo-Tibet frontline must be carted over 1500 kilometers from their logistic hubs at Lhasa and Kashgarh, which in turn must be stocked from central China, a further 2000 kilometers away. The entire logistic connectivity by road, rail, pipeline and air depends upon tenuous lines of communication and static staging yards, all situated over a terrain that is completely open, devoid of local resources and subject to such extreme conditions as it must obtain at 4300 meters of average altitude and sub-zero cold almost throughout the year. Even if China has engineered her transportation capacity to 24000 tons a day and therefore stated to be able to build up 30 divisions, including formations already in place, in 30 days, and sustain this force in war indefinitely, such theoretical calculations may be valid under ‘test conditions’, in practice this will invariably not be so. No doubt, the whole system of induction and sustenance for PLA’s field forces in war would be ripe for interdiction by air power and special operations.

On the Indian side, the terrain south of the 4300 to 5400 meter high Himalayan passes, constricted and snow-bound most of the year, is characterised by razor-sharp ridgelines, steep slopes and narrow, gorge-like valleys generally running North to South. The Indian logistic installations are between 350 to 400 kilometers in depth, and therefore, in terms of turn around time, comparable to that of the PLA in Tibet. Road axes connecting Indian foothills to the Indo-Tibet Border, being aligned more or less along the narrow valley floors, are extremely difficult to interdict by air or ground fire; these are targetable only in some stretches and even then require super-skills, high-technology and load of chance to score effective hits. Notably, scope exists to make such hits even more ineffective by means of modern methods of camouflage, deception and repair.

To undertake offensive operations in such terrain, PLA formations have to confine to constricted valleys that are hemmed-in by successive ridge lines, thus limiting the scope for tactical level lateral manoeuvre. At the operational level, axes of offensive have to remain isolated from each other, while envelopment and turning movement, besides inviting risks of entrapment, would entail such heavy logistic back up as to be prohibitive in terms of resources and time. Further, some distance down the Southern slopes into Indian territory, the terrain closes down to subsume the advantages that heavy weaponry and high-technology might bring to PLA’s offensive. Indeed, the ground is heavily biased in favour of defensive operations - if conducted with aggressive intent.

We have reasons to believe that mother earth has not been overly supportive of aggression from Tibetan Plateau across the Himalayan Passes into India. Indeed, any PLA offensive across the Indo-Tibet Border has to contend with an adverse terrain anomaly: its build-up and spring-board areas straddle a ground that exposes its war machine to disruption by inhospitable elements as well as air and ground attack, while its offensive across the watershed passes would be beleaguered by a ground that favours classically conducted defensive operations. Indeed, PLA’s offensive across the passes would have to fight ‘friction of terrain’ and ‘tension of logistics’ before engaging Indian forces - with “General Snow” ever ready to cut off its lifeline.

Therefore, even if the PLA commits overwhelming number of formations to its offensives, as to how many of these could actually be employable - along limited, narrow axes, and against successive lines of defences, remains a moot point to consider.

In addition an offensive by India's XVII mountain strike corps would further divert PLA forces.

:tup::tup::tup::tup::tup::tup::tup:
@Joe Shearer @MilSpec
 
.
Do you think US will go conventional to take third world country what if he uses nukes

Lets say to take you Pakistan Us launch series of Nuclear capable missiles what next you know results

Its happened in WW2 when population was bombed so its not hypothetical situation
You accuse others of being trolls and childish while you make more unreasonable statements?
 
. .
the world knows this put the indian poster on pdf know something we dont do.

India will never able to take on pakistan and china at war hence why they use terrorist proxies to hurt us.
india can't even take on Pakistan in a war despite having a numerical advantage.
They will cry to trump to save them because modi let them down with that laughable surgical strike.
 
.
You accuse others of being trolls and childish while you make more unreasonable statements?
did Us Not bombed japan with nukes It can happen again
What i am saying is truth Let reverse for that matter India

I don't think even india can survive US wrath if they decided to go nuclear

That proves my statement that us can take out any third world country
 
.
Back
Top Bottom