Its not a flawed logic, It is based on individuals observation and thinking. If these butchers do not represent Pakistan then why your govt is still hesitating to take action against masterminds of 26/11.
Maybe because we lack a little something thats called conclusive evidence. Maybe because we have our hands full at the moment. Maybe because being seen as succumbing to harsh Indian pressure will backfire domestically and further upset the already fragile state of Pakistan’s politics. Maybe because we require some more convincing that India is committed to peace and compromise, instead of being content with sitting on its high horse and bullying us around. So if you’d take a leave from your customary arrogance in regards to Pakistan, swallow your contempt for a bit, you’ll get your answers.
India is better prepared for Mumbai type attacks and there will be a sure shot response next time. Last time the response was held back. I am afraid no Indian government can survive without surgical military response next time.
I believe what the auther is saying is that it would be a mistake. It will lead to war and probably a nuclear exchange. Simple as that. I don't think that were Mumbai to happen again India would attack Pakistan, 'surgicial' or otherwise. They'll just try to juice it as much as they can, because at the end of the day no one will support an Indian military attack on Pakistan based on the actions of terrorists. And also, despite how much the Indian government screams about it, no one believes those killers were sent by the Pakistani government.
I dont agree with this logic... this more sounds like Nuclear Blackmail... like..we will send and support terrorists (knowingly or unknowingly) ..but india shldn't do anything... what the hell is this?
How can we 'send' and 'support' terrorists 'unknowingly'? You're contradicting yourself. Yes India shouldn't do anything if it cares about
actually defeating the terrorists. If the motivation behind attacking Pakistan is to vent some frustration against an old rival and show off some military muscle THEN you'd want to attack. But even there you'll be very disappointed with the results of confronting Pakistan militarily.
Pakistan..ask for unconditional talk...but asking for such a talk itself..is a big condition...IF pak has certain requirement for talk..then why not india ?
By saying that we don’t want you to attach conditions to talks we’re actually attaching a condition. Really? This is your argument? Are you sure you’ve thought it through?
Overall., one hard reality...yes we can't do much about Pak, unless otherwise they totally cut loose their beloved terrorists...
Your contributions have not been of a high quality so far.
Don’t troll. Terrorists are beloved of India just as much to Pakistan it can easily be argued.
Watch yourself while you’re here, consider this a fair warning.
Consider this, what options will Pakistan have left AFTER it has initiated nuclear war? expect the international community to step in and stop India? who would be willing to come in the way? China?(hint: '71, '99)
We’ll launch them once we’re sure that no one is coming. If the Indians make it to the Lahore-Karachi highway, nothing the Chinese or Americans say is going to matter. We’re responsible for our own security and it would be retarded to think that we made nuclear weapons only so other nations can come to our rescue AFTER we’ve used them on you.
Consider the author's own assessment, if India retaliates, Pakistan joins hands with the terrorists, gets hammered by the Indian military, uses nukes, and ends up committing national suicide. The war on terror will be compromised, the terrorists will gain ground in Pakistan, and the country would be torn to shreds.
I’m afraid you’re day dreaming again. If Pakistan would’ve been so easily ‘hammered’ into submission and action against terrorists by the Indian military then the temptation to attack would not have been resisted after Mumbai. We’re not just sitting here to be ‘hammered’ by you, we’ll do plenty of hammering ourselves. The only ones who’re gonna win are the terrorists. You really want that? Are you really retarded enough to think that ‘hammering’ Pakistan will make them stronger as opposed to weaker even IF it doesn’t come down to nukes? Did you even try to comprehend the point the author made here?
Pakistan won't press the losing button so easily, this is meant to comfort Pakistanis into thinking that they are permanently shielded by their nuclear arsenal.
Your whole logic is flawed. You say that nuclear weapons are only there as deterrent, and then you say that they’re just a deterrent so they shouldn’t deter us? That logic only applies if you think our nukes are fake. Not if they’re real and not if you have no idea when we’re going to use them, which they are and which you don’t.
Kashmir cannot be a prerequisite to peace, peace is a prerequisite to Kashmir
In case you haven’t noticed, we’ve had complete peace for a decade now, down to a ceasefire across the LoC. What more “peace” do you want? Anything more will remain elusive until you finally stop trying to ignore the elephant in the room and get down to some serious conflict resolution and peacemaking. Many wars have been fought and many conflicts have been resolved in this world, but NONE of them have accomplished peace without an addressing of the actual causes. Its like saying you won’t put out the fire until we get rid of all the smoke for you, and you’re not fooling anyone.
