I dont agree with this logic... this more sounds like Nuclear Blackmail... like..we will send and support terrorists (knowingly or unknowingly) ..but india shldn't do anything... what the hell is this?
Pakistan..ask for unconditional talk...but asking for such a talk itself..is a big condition...IF pak has certain requirement for talk..then why not india ?
Overall., one hard reality...yes we can't do much about Pak, unless otherwise they totally cut loose their beloved terrorists...
The hypocrisy and bias that runs through Indian minds is that they all *love* talking about Pakistan or the Terrorists when they strike them. However, they're neither willing nor ready to talk about Kashmir which is the root of the problem and the oppression and tyranny that India has been unleashing on the innocent Kashmiri Muslims with a brute army of 600,000 soldiers for decades.
Palestinians who're fighting for their land, their rights and their very dignity that is under the feet of Israel...Yet Israel still manages to convince its public that the Palestianins are terrorists and rebels and what not. Same is the case with Kashmiris- India only wakes up when freedom fighters cross the border and slap India across the face.
The root of the problem is Kashmir whose history and stance and current conditions since Indian occupation has been effectively and mischievously been hidden away from the Indian populations. Indian media in conjunction and supervision with their political elite has been indoctrinating Indians with a psychological obsession with Kashmir as if it was a part of India and has always been, which is in stark contrast to historical and current realities. Kashmir remained an independent state many times before Islam and Hinduism. So, if Kashmiris wanted to be sparate away from India in 1947, why shouldn't they be?
Indian Occupied Jammu Kashmir is not a glamorous Bhumbro Bhumbro piece of land full of beautiful women hijacked by militants, its in fact one of the most economically, socially and culturally deprived place in the world today according to the UN. Even freelance journalists and international observers are allowed in the most poor and dangerous war-torn parts of Africa, but not in the Indian Occupied Kashmir. Shouldn't that say something about India's role in Kashmir?
The author is as honest and straight-up as one can be. Continuous oppression only results in more hatred and rebellions. Unfortunately that's one thing India didn't learn from their British masters legacy...
It's all about survival of a race, an identity, an ethnicity, and religion. You cannot expect others to give up their guns when you' have yours pointed at them. India's aspiration of becoming a superpower will continue to be thrashed and Indian govn't will continously get slapped across the face by militants from time to time so long as they occupy and oppress the Kashmiri people.
Until and unless India is willing to talk, to negotiate and make compromises on Kashmir along with Pakistan and China on a round table, Indian occupation will continue, and so will be the resistance.
No Justice!! No Peace!!