What's new

India came close to striking Pak after 26/11: Air chief

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
NEW DELHI: India came close to striking Pakistan following the 26/11 Mumbai terrorist attack. This was stated by the IAF chief, Air Chief Marshal
Fali H Major, on Wednesday.

"There were certain options, which were certainly discussed. Depending on the objective and the task given, IAF had enough intelligence to do what it wanted to do then," ACM Major told reporters here during a joint press conference with his successor and IAF chief-designate Air Marshal P V Naik.

ACM Major, however, said at present the situation along the international border and the LoC was normal. In the eastern sector along the India-China border, ACM Major said the IAF is building landing infrastructure and will shortly move a Sukhoi-30 squadron to counter Chinese defence superiority in the region.

The newly-raised squadron of Su-30 will arrive at IAF's Tezpur base in the next few weeks, he said. Commenting on the recent Sukhoi crash, the air chief said an inquiry is still on and the crash data recorder is yet to be analysed. The death of the pilot in the crash has raised questions on the ejection system and the inquiry has to look into this aspect along with the flight control system to analyse the cause of the crash.

ACM Major's successor, Air Marshal Naik, said IAF is building up capacity and after 2017 it will be capable of handling threats coming from anywhere. To boost its combat capabilities, IAF will go in for large scale procurements.

India has already released two global tenders for the procurement of 22 attack and 15 heavy-lift helicopters for IAF.

"The Request for Proposals (RFP) for 15 heavy-lift helicopters is being issued today and the RFP for 22 combat helicopters was released yesterday," ACM Major said.

The choppers participating in the combat attack contract include Bell’s AH-1 Super Cobra, Boeing’s AH-64 Apache, Eurocopter’s Tiger, Russian Mil for Mi-35 and Agusta Westland’s Mangusta.

The RFP for attack helicopters comes within two months of the previous tender being cancelled. The earlier tender was cancelled in March after the American vendors opted out of the race, citing the 50% offsets clause in the contract.


The heavy-lift helicopters will be used for transporting men and material in the high altitude regions, which can be accessed only by helicopters.
India came close to striking Pak after 26/11: Air chief - India - The Times of India
 
Last edited:
.
News amendment ::

India came close to DREAM striking Pakistan- iaf cheif

New Dehli : " i was deep asleep when dreamed about striking Pakistan, we were v close but suddenly i woke up and found out i have been p*s*ng in my pants. ACM Major told reporters during a press conference.

What a dhakan aircheif !
 
.
News amendment ::

India came close to DREAM striking Pakistan- iaf cheif

New Dehli : " i was deep asleep when dreamed about striking Pakistan, we were v close but suddenly i woke up and found out i have been p*s*ng in my pants. ACM Major told reporters during a press conference.

What a dhakan aircheif !

Well said bro; well said :pakistan:
 
.
Pak marin----imran 2006,

Don't let the door hit you in the back. We expect better and intelligent comments from our viewers, members and readers.

This is not a teenager's chat room----when you make a post over here----post it with integrity and spend time on your research---one of the ereasons of this web-site is to make the pakistanis aware of the threats that we are facing---.

Do young pakistanis really really think that we are running this operation just so that we can stay ignorant of the enemy's strengths and our weaknesses---if such is the case, then seemingly we have really really failed to convey the true message to the young pakistani members.
 
.
News amendment ::

India came close to DREAM striking Pakistan- iaf cheif

New Dehli : " i was deep asleep when dreamed about striking Pakistan, we were v close but suddenly i woke up and found out i have been p*s*ng in my pants. ACM Major told reporters during a press conference.

What a dhakan aircheif !

:rofl::rofl::rofl:: nicely said man god bless u
 
.
Well, this validates the position of Pakistan to mobilize to deter any possible aggression from India in the aftermath of Mumbai.

Some Indian apologists like to argue that there was no threat from India, and Pakistan reacted on the basis of 'media reports'. I think it is clear now that the Pakistani mobilization was necessary and based on legitimate threat perceptions.
 
.
Agno,


Why did they stop-----first in 2002 and then in 2008---they had us both the times---right in the crosshair---and then they let us walk away----.

I think----india should take the next bigger step---if they opted not to go for war at that time----then there is no more reason to go for war----now there is every reason to sit down and chalk out a peace plan---let bygones be bygones and let us move ahead with life.
 
.
Agno,


Why did they stop-----first in 2002 and then in 2008---they had us both the times---right in the crosshair---and then they let us walk away----.

I think----india should take the next bigger step---if they opted not to go for war at that time----then there is no more reason to go for war----now there is every reason to sit down and chalk out a peace plan---let bygones be bygones and let us move ahead with life.

It has been mentioned time and again by Indian ministers-Conditional Friendship. Pakistan must stop exporting terrorism to India. Pakistan has long been in the habbit of using terrorism as an extension to state policy. Have you not noticed, things are nice and dandy then some mujahid from Pakistan blows something in India?
 
.
It has been mentioned time and again by Indian ministers-Conditional Friendship. Pakistan must stop exporting terrorism to India. Pakistan has long been in the habbit of using terrorism as an extension to state policy. Have you not noticed, things are nice and dandy then some mujahid from Pakistan blows something in India?

Pakistan has never exported terrorism to India - the only place where we have been involved is the disputed territory of Kashmir, and on that count Pakistan as almost eliminated cross-loc infiltration and the insurgency.

There is no fool proof guarantee against terrorism, especially when India has its home grown terrorists as well, and typically places the blame for those attacks on Pakistan as well.

Whats India's next excuse?
 
.
Pakistan has never exported terrorism to India - the only place where we have been involved is the disputed territory of Kashmir, and on that count Pakistan as almost eliminated cross-loc infiltration and the insurgency.

There is no fool proof guarantee against terrorism, especially when India has its home grown terrorists as well, and typically places the blame for those attacks on Pakistan as well.

Whats India's next excuse?

Especially with Army's cross firing, when the infiltrators wants to infiltrate.

The bigger issue is India has to go UN to ban these terrorist activities that are harbored in Pakistanie soil, once that is done they are dismantled. After few months they are allowed to open under a new name, and back to business. If the Pakistanie gov't is serious in these matters, why this has become such a looping precedance.
 
.
Especially with Army's cross firing, when the infiltrators wants to infiltrate.

The bigger issue is India has to go UN to ban these terrorist activities that are harbored in Pakistanie soil, once that is done they are dismantled. After few months they are allowed to open under a new name, and back to business. If the Pakistanie gov't is serious in these matters, why this has become such a looping precedance.

I understand India's skepticism over Hafiz Saeed 'reforming', but I have yet to see any evidence that he or his organization (the JuD) have actively engaged in terrorism.

They run hundreds of clinics, schools and langars, which are at considerable expense.

Finally - Pakistan has chosen to restrain and clamp down on some of these groups, and limit or end their activities in Kashmir instead of outright dismantling them because of various reasons. Many of these groups still enjoy public support for their struggle in Kashmir against Indian occupation, and moving to shut them down completely would possibly result in a severe political backlash.

Forcibly dismantling some of these groups may also prompt them to go underground and link up with terrorist organizations acting against the Pakistani State, and there is some evidence that is already happening with alleged LeT and JuM involvement in some of the terrorist attacks in Pakistan.

Pakistan may consider restraining these groups instead of dismantling them and driving them underground (until some sort of Kashmir settlement) a better option to avoid the fallout. A Kashmir settlement strengthens the hand of the GoP domestically when acting against these groups. Obviously exceptions have to be made when the groups act unilaterally as in Mumbai.

Finally, controlling and restraining the groups vs completely dismantling them also has roots in the lack of trust in India and the belief that she is supporting militants in Pakistan.
 
.
I understand India's skepticism over Hafiz Saeed 'reforming', but I have yet to see any evidence that he or his organization (the JuD) have actively engaged in terrorism.

That is not what the Pak government says.

It is clear that Mumbai attack were by Pakistani people. Govt. of Pakistan is claiming that JuD is the one responsible. They (and India, US and EU) have classified JuD as a terrorist organization. The previous govt. under Musharraf also called LeT (later JuD) terrorists.

If the JuD has been set-up, then who is the real culprit ? Are you saying that Pakistan is covering up the real culprits? Or do you really believe the conspiracy theory that India attacked its own commercial capital ?Are you saying that a group of terrorists can't also act as a charity to create a nice front? Or do you disbelieve everything the Pak govt. says.


I don't understand what you are trying to say. I am even more confused when you go on to say that LeT is involved in terror attacks in Pakistan. Is not LeT & JuD the same thing ? (Same founder, same location, same feeder charities for funding etc.?). Atleast that is what i understood from Pak govt. statements after Lal Masjid Operations.
 
.
It has been mentioned time and again by Indian ministers-Conditional Friendship. Pakistan must stop exporting terrorism to India. Pakistan has long been in the habbit of using terrorism as an extension to state policy. Have you not noticed, things are nice and dandy then some mujahid from Pakistan blows something in India?

Oh please...let's not start again.
You sound just like Mr. Mukherjee or Mr. Manmohan Singh.
Oh, you're most likely a huge supporter of both of these men.
Be sensible and don't give us that bullsh!t.
India is equally guilty when it comes to "exporting terrorism".
If you continue to believe and think that your country is free of all blame then there is no use talking to you.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom