paritosh
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2008
- Messages
- 3,363
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
i am not offended bro...may the relations brighten up someday...
India-Bangladesh Relations: The way forward
- Thread starter Gabbar
- Start date
i am not offended bro...may the relations brighten up someday...
Nemesis
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,236
- Reaction score
- 0
Exactly bro. If we ask for it than it's security issue but for India it's business. Hypocrite. I don't want see Indians in our shore even if it's good for us......It will be almost like inviting crocodile by cutting a canal.
We should let china build naval base at the chitagong port like pakistan did in Gwadar.......That way India will be surrounded by three front.
You would rather have Chinese influence in your country rather than Indian? Is that wise?
Judging by the posts made, India is surrounded by foes on three sides. But of course this matters little, Bangladesh neither has the capacity nor the will to fight India. So what is the point of making these remarks?
We should focus on how to develop relations for the mutual benefit of both nations, not have megalomania fantasies of ruling the other country.
Contrarian
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2006
- Messages
- 11,571
- Reaction score
- 4
Buddy, Bangladesh is not a major warship builder. It doesnt have the kind of shipyards. BD has consistently built commercial/civilian ships of not very high tonnages.
As regards to Pakistan, they arent even as good as BD in shipbuilding. They have till date not built even one warship.
TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Bangladesh can build the ship structure (Frigate size ship not a problem), but armament, torpedo, missile launcher, guidance system, jammer, radder have to be imported from China.
TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Changing Dynamics of Indo-Bangladesh Economic Relations
By Dr. Anand Kumar
The political relationship between India and Bangladesh may not be very encouraging, but the economic relationship recently has improved in favour of Bangladesh. For a long time Indias eastern neighbour has been complaining about the growing imbalance in trade. However, the latest data released by Bangladesh have indicated that there has been a significant change in this relationship.
There has been a massive increase in the exports of Bangladesh to India. It has risen by 68 percent, amounting to $241.96 million in fiscal 2005-06. In the preceding year, they stood at $143.66 million only. This increase in exports has largely been to northeastern states. On the other hand, according to the statistics provided by Export Promotion Bureau (EPB) of Bangladesh imports from India have dropped by around 8 percent, totaling $1,868 million in the last financial year from $2,025.78 million in FY 2004-05. As a result of this rise in exports and decline in imports the trade deficit of Bangladesh with India narrowed by around 14 percent in the last financial year.
The trade deficit of Bangladesh with India had ballooned to a record $2,003 million in 2003-04. However, it came down to $1,882 million in the following year and $1,626 million in FY 05-06.
According to vice-chairman of Export Promotion Bureau (EPB), Mir Sahabuddin Mohammad exports to the northeastern states of India have increased substantially in the last financial year. This rise is because of change of policy of government of India which has facilitated the work of businessmen. Earlier the banks in the northeastern India could not open letters of credit (L/Cs) for imports from Bangladesh, discouraging potential importers. But now they can open L/Cs, which has facilitated the trade between the two countries. Though Bangladesh has a trade deficit with India, it is surplus with the northeastern states.
Bangladesh has also made sustained effort to increase its exports to India. EPB had organised several exhibitions in India and received a good response from the Indian importers and buyers. Bangladeshi officials say that there are demands for Bangladeshi products including toiletries, cosmetics, melamine, fish, leather and ceramics in these Indian states.
Despite this jump in exports, Bangladeshi exporters are still complaining that some non-tariff barriers like mandatory testing required by India, inadequate banking facilities and poor infrastructure at the land ports are hindering Bangladesh's export growth to India. They also claim that India deliberately tries to stall import from Bangladesh, as its land customs officials are not informed about the preferential market access given to Dhaka by New Delhi.
Bangladesh has earlier not been able to export to India because it had a very small export basket. Besides, its products were not very competitive internationally. As a result they have not been able to penetrate into Indian economy that is increasingly getting globalised.
Still, India has been trying to help Bangladesh and is willing to relax restrictions for Bangladesh even in the area of restricted categories like readymade garments for which Bangladesh has been insisting.
Problem of Infrastructure
The trade between India and Bangladesh also suffers because of poor infrastructural facilities. The reason behind this under development of infrastructure has been the reluctance of Bangladesh to provide trans-shipment facilities to India. This has discouraged both sides from constructing proper road and rails links.
The infrastructural bottleneck was also highlighted by the multilateral donor agency World Bank. The donor agency feels that an inter-country railway link between Bangladesh and India would accelerate economic growth of the two countries. Speaking at a press conference in Dhaka on July 3, 2006 World Bank Country Director Christine I Wallich said, "When I first came to Bangladesh, I had visited some border areas and found the possibility of such a railway linkage."
The issue of infrastructure was also raised by Indian High Commissioner Veena Sikri when Bangladesh Commerce Minister Hafiz Uddin Ahmad tried to highlight the issue of trade gap while inaugurating the Indian Cotton Yarn and Fabric Show 2006 at a hotel in Dhaka on July 9. Sikri suggested that Bangladesh develop its Mangla port and link it with Haldia port in West Bengal to accelerate trade and reduce the trade gap between the two countries. She stressed the need for increased direct transport links with Bangladesh, which in turn has invited India to invest more in its fabric and yarn sector. Noting that Bangladesh remained India's third largest export destination for fabric and the second largest for yarn, Sikri said that increase in trade and the bridging of the deficit would depend on how fast Bangladesh improved its infrastructure.
The issue of infrastructural bottleneck was discussed at the fourth meeting of the Indo-Bangladesh Joint Working Group (JWG) on trade which was held in Agartala on July 5 and 6 this year. MVPC Sastri, joint secretary in the commerce ministry, headed the Indian delegation while additional secretary in the commerce ministry Elias Ahmed led the Bangladesh team. Senior officials of the commerce and industries departments of the five bordering states - West Bengal, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura - also participated in the meeting, being held in the northeastern state for the first time.
In this meeting India and Bangladesh have decided to modernise and upgrade existing infrastructure, including roads, to boost their bilateral trade. After the meeting Sastry said, 'We have decided to modernise and upgrade our existing infrastructure including road connectivity to further boost the trade between the two countries - especially between the northeastern states of India and Bangladesh.'
In this meeting once again the issue of huge bilateral trade gap existing between the two nations was discussed. Sastry, who led the 16-member Indian team said, 'The northeastern states of India have huge resources and raw materials and these can be exported to Bangladesh. After due processing, the finished products can be made available to the people of the region at much cheaper rates.'
It was also decided that the custom officials of both the countries will soon meet and review the performance of 176 land custom stations in the five states along the India-Bangladesh border. Some of the stations will be further strengthened and some of them will be redeployed. Earlier, India had allocated Rs.2 billion for the development of five trade centres at Sutarkandhi and Karimganj in Assam, Demagiri in Mizoram, Dawki in Meghalaya and Moreh in Manipur.
Recently Tripura Chief Minister Manik Sarakar also highlighted that business in India's northeast would get a major boost if the region is allowed to use Bangladeshi ports for speedier transportation of goods. Speaking to media on September 14 he said, "Business between India's northeast and Southeast Asia would grow if we are allowed to use the Bangladeshi ports of Chittagong and Ashuganj for ferrying goods and other raw materials." Chittagong port is just 75 km from south Tripura's border town of Sabroom, while the Ashuganj port is 25 km from state capital Agartala. It is believed that Bangladesh would benefit immensely if India was allowed to access its ports. According to Sarkar the northeastern market is estimated to be about Rs.200 billion and this could help Bangladesh ease its trade deficit with India.
Unfortunately, an attitude of cooperation has not been seen from the side of Bangladesh. The country has negative trade balance with most countries and uses remittances from expatriate Bangladeshis to finance its imports. But Bangladesh appears to be obsessed with the trade gap, which it has with India.
As a result, in recent times the country has been following policies which discourage import from India. No wonder, the latest data show that the Bangladesh import from India has declined.
In the past, India has been the largest trading partner of Bangladesh. That is no longer the situation. Sometime back data released from Bangladesh indicated that China has replaced India as its largest trading partner. There is no denying the fact that Chinese economy has been growing and making its presence felt in the world, the increase in Sino-Bangladesh trade is also because of a conscious policy followed by both these countries. There is nothing wrong if Bangladesh tries to increase its trade with China. What is problematic is its attempt to restrict economic relationship with India, which is showing in the latest data of imports.
Bangladesh thinks that its negative trade balance with India is because of the tariff and para-tariff barriers, which is not true. Even if India reduces its duties to 0-5 percent which it has agreed to do under SAFTA, a yawning trade gap would remain. Bangladesh must realize that if it wants to reduce this gap it would have to come up with more products of quality which are internationally competitive.
India knows the limitation of Bangladesh. Hence to help the country on this count, Indias leading business house, Tata group suggested a three billion dollar investment proposal. Had this proposal been accepted by Bangladesh it would have drastically changed the complexion of bilateral trade. Unfortunately Bangladesh does not want to take any policy decision which is viewed as pro-India in an election year. Though sound economics demanded this, political considerations are keeping the proposal in abeyance.
There is almost no hope that the Bangladesh government would approve a $3-billion investment by the Tata group before the formation of next government. Alan Rosling, executive director of Tata Sons said, "If we can't make progress, we will cut back our commitments in these projects and reallocate our resources." He also felt that the priority for the group might change in next six months. Hence the opportunity for Bangladesh is now.
Officials in Bangladesh are however, hopeful that the Tata group would stay on course until after the polls. Mahmudur Rahman, energy adviser to the Bangladesh government is optimistic that Tata will eventually show their patience for six more months after doing all the hard work covering nearly two years."
The investment by the Tata group would have exceeded all the foreign investment Bangladesh has received since 1972. It could have boosted Bangladesh's GDP by 1.9 percent annually, and benefit its balance of payments by as much as $18 billion, besides creating jobs for 24,000 people. The coal project could have added to the energy supply of Bangladesh, where just 30 percent of its 140 million people have access to electricity.
A pullout by the Tatas would be a further setback to the country's creaky power infrastructure and its ability to attract critical foreign investment. A section in both India and Bangladesh believes that the proposal of Tatas might become a reality after the next government is formed in Bangladesh. But if that does not happen, it would seriously hurt the economic interests of Bangladesh.
Conclusion
The huge trade gap existing between India and Bangladesh has more to do with the differing nature of economies of both countries. It is not because of any hostile or restrictive policy followed by India. Bangladesh is dependent on India even for the import of its essentials. When India restricted export of these items because of growing domestic demand, prices of these commodities shot up in Bangladesh. Besides, India is exporting a number of other items. On the other hand, Bangladesh has very few items to offer. Hence a huge trade gap is bound to exist. Bangladesh could have bridged this gap by providing trans-shipment facility to India. Unfortunately, the country does not want to do that as any policy which is pro-India is perceived as anti-national by many in Bangladesh. India has also tried to encourage investment in Bangladesh so that the number of products exported from that country can be increased. But even in that case, Bangladesh has shown little interest. The recent increase in Bangladeshi export to northeastern India is because of favourable policy followed by this country. India wants to deepen the economic relationship between Bangladesh and northeastern India which will be beneficial for both of them. A lot will depend on the attitude of the government formed after the next elections in Bangladesh.
By Dr. Anand Kumar
The political relationship between India and Bangladesh may not be very encouraging, but the economic relationship recently has improved in favour of Bangladesh. For a long time Indias eastern neighbour has been complaining about the growing imbalance in trade. However, the latest data released by Bangladesh have indicated that there has been a significant change in this relationship.
There has been a massive increase in the exports of Bangladesh to India. It has risen by 68 percent, amounting to $241.96 million in fiscal 2005-06. In the preceding year, they stood at $143.66 million only. This increase in exports has largely been to northeastern states. On the other hand, according to the statistics provided by Export Promotion Bureau (EPB) of Bangladesh imports from India have dropped by around 8 percent, totaling $1,868 million in the last financial year from $2,025.78 million in FY 2004-05. As a result of this rise in exports and decline in imports the trade deficit of Bangladesh with India narrowed by around 14 percent in the last financial year.
The trade deficit of Bangladesh with India had ballooned to a record $2,003 million in 2003-04. However, it came down to $1,882 million in the following year and $1,626 million in FY 05-06.
According to vice-chairman of Export Promotion Bureau (EPB), Mir Sahabuddin Mohammad exports to the northeastern states of India have increased substantially in the last financial year. This rise is because of change of policy of government of India which has facilitated the work of businessmen. Earlier the banks in the northeastern India could not open letters of credit (L/Cs) for imports from Bangladesh, discouraging potential importers. But now they can open L/Cs, which has facilitated the trade between the two countries. Though Bangladesh has a trade deficit with India, it is surplus with the northeastern states.
Bangladesh has also made sustained effort to increase its exports to India. EPB had organised several exhibitions in India and received a good response from the Indian importers and buyers. Bangladeshi officials say that there are demands for Bangladeshi products including toiletries, cosmetics, melamine, fish, leather and ceramics in these Indian states.
Despite this jump in exports, Bangladeshi exporters are still complaining that some non-tariff barriers like mandatory testing required by India, inadequate banking facilities and poor infrastructure at the land ports are hindering Bangladesh's export growth to India. They also claim that India deliberately tries to stall import from Bangladesh, as its land customs officials are not informed about the preferential market access given to Dhaka by New Delhi.
Bangladesh has earlier not been able to export to India because it had a very small export basket. Besides, its products were not very competitive internationally. As a result they have not been able to penetrate into Indian economy that is increasingly getting globalised.
Still, India has been trying to help Bangladesh and is willing to relax restrictions for Bangladesh even in the area of restricted categories like readymade garments for which Bangladesh has been insisting.
Problem of Infrastructure
The trade between India and Bangladesh also suffers because of poor infrastructural facilities. The reason behind this under development of infrastructure has been the reluctance of Bangladesh to provide trans-shipment facilities to India. This has discouraged both sides from constructing proper road and rails links.
The infrastructural bottleneck was also highlighted by the multilateral donor agency World Bank. The donor agency feels that an inter-country railway link between Bangladesh and India would accelerate economic growth of the two countries. Speaking at a press conference in Dhaka on July 3, 2006 World Bank Country Director Christine I Wallich said, "When I first came to Bangladesh, I had visited some border areas and found the possibility of such a railway linkage."
The issue of infrastructure was also raised by Indian High Commissioner Veena Sikri when Bangladesh Commerce Minister Hafiz Uddin Ahmad tried to highlight the issue of trade gap while inaugurating the Indian Cotton Yarn and Fabric Show 2006 at a hotel in Dhaka on July 9. Sikri suggested that Bangladesh develop its Mangla port and link it with Haldia port in West Bengal to accelerate trade and reduce the trade gap between the two countries. She stressed the need for increased direct transport links with Bangladesh, which in turn has invited India to invest more in its fabric and yarn sector. Noting that Bangladesh remained India's third largest export destination for fabric and the second largest for yarn, Sikri said that increase in trade and the bridging of the deficit would depend on how fast Bangladesh improved its infrastructure.
The issue of infrastructural bottleneck was discussed at the fourth meeting of the Indo-Bangladesh Joint Working Group (JWG) on trade which was held in Agartala on July 5 and 6 this year. MVPC Sastri, joint secretary in the commerce ministry, headed the Indian delegation while additional secretary in the commerce ministry Elias Ahmed led the Bangladesh team. Senior officials of the commerce and industries departments of the five bordering states - West Bengal, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Tripura - also participated in the meeting, being held in the northeastern state for the first time.
In this meeting India and Bangladesh have decided to modernise and upgrade existing infrastructure, including roads, to boost their bilateral trade. After the meeting Sastry said, 'We have decided to modernise and upgrade our existing infrastructure including road connectivity to further boost the trade between the two countries - especially between the northeastern states of India and Bangladesh.'
In this meeting once again the issue of huge bilateral trade gap existing between the two nations was discussed. Sastry, who led the 16-member Indian team said, 'The northeastern states of India have huge resources and raw materials and these can be exported to Bangladesh. After due processing, the finished products can be made available to the people of the region at much cheaper rates.'
It was also decided that the custom officials of both the countries will soon meet and review the performance of 176 land custom stations in the five states along the India-Bangladesh border. Some of the stations will be further strengthened and some of them will be redeployed. Earlier, India had allocated Rs.2 billion for the development of five trade centres at Sutarkandhi and Karimganj in Assam, Demagiri in Mizoram, Dawki in Meghalaya and Moreh in Manipur.
Recently Tripura Chief Minister Manik Sarakar also highlighted that business in India's northeast would get a major boost if the region is allowed to use Bangladeshi ports for speedier transportation of goods. Speaking to media on September 14 he said, "Business between India's northeast and Southeast Asia would grow if we are allowed to use the Bangladeshi ports of Chittagong and Ashuganj for ferrying goods and other raw materials." Chittagong port is just 75 km from south Tripura's border town of Sabroom, while the Ashuganj port is 25 km from state capital Agartala. It is believed that Bangladesh would benefit immensely if India was allowed to access its ports. According to Sarkar the northeastern market is estimated to be about Rs.200 billion and this could help Bangladesh ease its trade deficit with India.
Unfortunately, an attitude of cooperation has not been seen from the side of Bangladesh. The country has negative trade balance with most countries and uses remittances from expatriate Bangladeshis to finance its imports. But Bangladesh appears to be obsessed with the trade gap, which it has with India.
As a result, in recent times the country has been following policies which discourage import from India. No wonder, the latest data show that the Bangladesh import from India has declined.
In the past, India has been the largest trading partner of Bangladesh. That is no longer the situation. Sometime back data released from Bangladesh indicated that China has replaced India as its largest trading partner. There is no denying the fact that Chinese economy has been growing and making its presence felt in the world, the increase in Sino-Bangladesh trade is also because of a conscious policy followed by both these countries. There is nothing wrong if Bangladesh tries to increase its trade with China. What is problematic is its attempt to restrict economic relationship with India, which is showing in the latest data of imports.
Bangladesh thinks that its negative trade balance with India is because of the tariff and para-tariff barriers, which is not true. Even if India reduces its duties to 0-5 percent which it has agreed to do under SAFTA, a yawning trade gap would remain. Bangladesh must realize that if it wants to reduce this gap it would have to come up with more products of quality which are internationally competitive.
India knows the limitation of Bangladesh. Hence to help the country on this count, Indias leading business house, Tata group suggested a three billion dollar investment proposal. Had this proposal been accepted by Bangladesh it would have drastically changed the complexion of bilateral trade. Unfortunately Bangladesh does not want to take any policy decision which is viewed as pro-India in an election year. Though sound economics demanded this, political considerations are keeping the proposal in abeyance.
There is almost no hope that the Bangladesh government would approve a $3-billion investment by the Tata group before the formation of next government. Alan Rosling, executive director of Tata Sons said, "If we can't make progress, we will cut back our commitments in these projects and reallocate our resources." He also felt that the priority for the group might change in next six months. Hence the opportunity for Bangladesh is now.
Officials in Bangladesh are however, hopeful that the Tata group would stay on course until after the polls. Mahmudur Rahman, energy adviser to the Bangladesh government is optimistic that Tata will eventually show their patience for six more months after doing all the hard work covering nearly two years."
The investment by the Tata group would have exceeded all the foreign investment Bangladesh has received since 1972. It could have boosted Bangladesh's GDP by 1.9 percent annually, and benefit its balance of payments by as much as $18 billion, besides creating jobs for 24,000 people. The coal project could have added to the energy supply of Bangladesh, where just 30 percent of its 140 million people have access to electricity.
A pullout by the Tatas would be a further setback to the country's creaky power infrastructure and its ability to attract critical foreign investment. A section in both India and Bangladesh believes that the proposal of Tatas might become a reality after the next government is formed in Bangladesh. But if that does not happen, it would seriously hurt the economic interests of Bangladesh.
Conclusion
The huge trade gap existing between India and Bangladesh has more to do with the differing nature of economies of both countries. It is not because of any hostile or restrictive policy followed by India. Bangladesh is dependent on India even for the import of its essentials. When India restricted export of these items because of growing domestic demand, prices of these commodities shot up in Bangladesh. Besides, India is exporting a number of other items. On the other hand, Bangladesh has very few items to offer. Hence a huge trade gap is bound to exist. Bangladesh could have bridged this gap by providing trans-shipment facility to India. Unfortunately, the country does not want to do that as any policy which is pro-India is perceived as anti-national by many in Bangladesh. India has also tried to encourage investment in Bangladesh so that the number of products exported from that country can be increased. But even in that case, Bangladesh has shown little interest. The recent increase in Bangladeshi export to northeastern India is because of favourable policy followed by this country. India wants to deepen the economic relationship between Bangladesh and northeastern India which will be beneficial for both of them. A lot will depend on the attitude of the government formed after the next elections in Bangladesh.
Gabbar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 2,118
- Reaction score
- 0
This article was writen before the BD election and hopefully BD and next Indian goverment will take positive steps toward building better relationships. Using Chitagong port will be huge boost for north-east. Does abybody what is news on the nighway from Calcuta to Bangcok via BD and Mayamar? Is it even in the planes now?
TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Current proposed highway has all the entry and exit points comes and goes from India not the shortest distance to get to the bangkok. BD wanted one exit should go to NE and another exit should go via Chittagong to myanmar to Bangkok. But BD could not get India to agree on that for obvious reason as India wants its upper hand in that deal. So BD refrained on signing the deal and the previous govt almost scraped the whole idea of that highway.
The AL govt said they will sign to it but they put TAR (Trans Asian Railway) on front track which will enter bangladesh from India and exit through Myanmar. They are betting a lot of money on that.
Port will be open very soon I suppose. But we need Deep Sea port as well to meet the demand of BD, India, China and Myanmar which will come into operation by 2016. I cant wait to see that port rolling.
BanglaBhoot
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2007
- Messages
- 8,839
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
This is an article written for RAW website SAAG. It has no credibility.
india and indians want the relation where they can install Awami like puppet govt, intervene at will and even occupy. Rest of noise by indians are just pure deception. At least indian foreign minister made that clear to political leaders.
Even Bangladesh say go away indians are keep coming back with nagging and deceptive move.
-------------------------------
[" Addressing them in the capital’s Mavalankar Hall, foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee disclosed a conspiracy was afoot to destabilise the elected governments in Bangladesh and Pakistan. He let out a hitherto unknown fact to the audience: "I had to go out of my way to issue a stern warning to those trying to destabilise the Sheikh Hasina government in Bangladesh that if they continued with their attempts, then India would not sit idle." In other words, New Delhi had conveyed it was willing to take counter-measures in the Great Game, including the possibility of direct intervention. " ]
http://outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20090316&fname=Cover+Story&sid=1&pn=2
Even Bangladesh say go away indians are keep coming back with nagging and deceptive move.
-------------------------------
[" Addressing them in the capital’s Mavalankar Hall, foreign minister Pranab Mukherjee disclosed a conspiracy was afoot to destabilise the elected governments in Bangladesh and Pakistan. He let out a hitherto unknown fact to the audience: "I had to go out of my way to issue a stern warning to those trying to destabilise the Sheikh Hasina government in Bangladesh that if they continued with their attempts, then India would not sit idle." In other words, New Delhi had conveyed it was willing to take counter-measures in the Great Game, including the possibility of direct intervention. " ]
http://outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20090316&fname=Cover+Story&sid=1&pn=2
Stumper
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,226
- Reaction score
- 0
Im not too confident on TAR .. used to dream about comman currency some time back .... but its not feasible in our region.
Which port will this be in 2016? Sonadia?
Stumper
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,226
- Reaction score
- 0
Ah, You continue with your dissembling pejoratives. We need to defend my country from your Equivocations, so we come back.
Mukherjee made it quite clear what his intentions are and WHY as well.
Adding the next/imediate para from outlook article:
"The plan, Delhi feels, was to ensure a violent reaction from the Bangladesh army, thus plunging the country into chaos. A senior diplomat told Outlook that New Delhi advised Hasina and the Bangladesh army to tread cautiously and avoid creating a 1975-like situation, when most members of the countrys founder Mujibur Rahmans family were gunned down. That was perhaps the reason why Hasina announced general amnesty to secure the surrender of BDR mutineers"
TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Even though I dont agree on a lot of things that article said but still its important to know indian perspective. So I posted it here.
TopCat
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 15,736
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
How could you dream of a common currency when every economy in south asia has so much uncommon. I am sure that India will use TAR partially as well as BD will use it substantially. India could use rail link to connect to NE which could be part of TAR. Not sure they wanted to go to Myanmar or Bangkok through land or Sea would be the best way to commute.
Yes Sonadia will be the port.
Stumper
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 1,226
- Reaction score
- 0
, i was.
Gabbar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2009
- Messages
- 2,118
- Reaction score
- 0
Similar threads
- Article
- Article
