What's new

India abruptly puts off border talks with China

I don't know what you accuse me of.

But I am basing my posts solely on my interaction with those wannabe whites who hate their Chinese roots (I detest them for that) and based on the posts of the Chinese members in that thread which told me this is the general trend in China.

I also saw many Indians supporting the Chinese in their concerns because we also faced a similar problem which has now subisded largely.

I think you are not taking my opinion seriously because of my flags. But remember we two nations are the only nations currently standing out against the Abrahamic religions.

If those wannabe WCP Chinese achieve what they want then India too will not be safe from them.

I base my reply on your previous posts. :lol:

Abrahamic religions have already conquered the world. Statistically, China is most likely to remain as a majority atheist country.

The Chinese government does not allow foreign rich religious organizations to come here and convert whoever they want, like the Catholic Church has already done in most of the developing world.

Anyway, the base number of Christians in China is too small, and their birth rate too low, to have any chance of demographic upheaval.
 
.
This happened AFTER India backstabbed us in 1959, and AFTER the Sino-Indian war.

India turned China from a friend into an eternal enemy. Now we have given nukes to Pakistan, so even they alone are capable of holding India off, as we saw in 2008.



Again, learn to read. :lol:

It was India that turned us into enemies, by hosting our largest separatist group in 1959, and with the Forward Policy in 1962.

It was India who initiated the last Sino-Indian war, and again it is up to you to start it. If you have the balls, then repeat the Forward Policy and see what happens.

Oh wait, you guys couldn't even stand up to Pakistan, despite boasting about "surgical strikes" in response to the Mumbai attacks.

boring

remember what we did to Pakistan when we decided to do so

your nation was not able to do anything
 
.
I base my reply on your previous posts. :lol:

Abrahamic religions have already conquered the world. Statistically, China is most likely to remain as a majority atheist country.

The Chinese government does not allow foreign rich religious organizations to come here and convert whoever they want, like the Catholic Church has already done in most of the developing world.

Anyway, the base number of Christians in China is too small, and their birth rate too low, to have any chance of demographic upheaval.

Well ok. You seem too engrossed with my flags to see the content of my posts. The birth rate is of no use here as the Modus operandi of evangelists is to convert already born other faith people. Regarding the CPC not allowing them (good move) they have circumvented it by praying inside their homes and establishing underground "home churches".

I just hope against hope that China does not succumb to them and become another South Korea though according to what I heard there is a very real danger of that happening. Maybe when you become aware of the danger it will be too late to do anything.
 
.
Well ok. You seem too engrossed with my flags to see the content of my posts. The birth rate is of no use here as the Modus operandi of evangelists is to convert already born other faith people. Regarding the CPC not allowing them (good move) they have circumvented it by praying inside their homes and establishing underground "home churches".

I just hope against hope that China does not succumb to them and become another South Korea though according to what I heard there is a very real danger of that happening. Maybe when you become aware of the danger it will be too late to do anything.

Chinese can be very stubborn in this issue.

Look at the "Straits Chinese", who immigrated to Malaysia and Indonesia hundreds of years ago.

Today, they are not Muslims, even despite being there for centuries. They were not allowed to marry the local Muslims unless they converted, and they had a pork-based diet, which set them apart from the local population.

In this modern era, I feel that Old Chinese beliefs will give way to atheism. My parents for example were Chinese Buddhists, and my generation are mostly non-religious.
 
. .
Chinese can be very stubborn in this issue.

Look at the "Straits Chinese", who immigrated to Malaysia and Indonesia hundreds of years ago.

Today, they are not Muslims, even despite being there for centuries. They were not allowed to marry the local Muslims unless they converted, and they had a pork-based diet, which set them apart from the local population.

In this modern era, I feel that Old Chinese beliefs will give way to atheism. My parents for example were Chinese Buddhists, and my generation are mostly non-religious.

I just hope for your sake that what you say is true though I'm not entirely convinced because that affects my nation as well.And that WPC's words still ring in my ears as if he is doing some great charity work :hitwall:
 
.

Whats more credible than Indian media on these matters ? :lol: Does one ask a Nazi the image of Fuhrer ? :rofl:
Xinjiang Doesn't See Foreign Link in Attacks - WSJ.com

A spokeswoman for the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region said there was no evidence that attackers had trained in Pakistan, as authorities in Xinjiang have previously suggested, or elsewhere overseas. The regional spokeswoman, Hou Hanmin, said attackers in the region were loosely organized with no obvious links to extremists in Pakistan or elsewhere.

"These people are local, and the weapons they used are homemade," she said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. "We can't be certain there were any ties with the outside."


So now wake up and get back to the topic ...
 
.
And have you forgotten the smashing the Chinese Army got in Nathula in 1967 and Somdorongchu in 1987? Very convenient for you to forget, what? Yes! Those were nightmares you sure would like to forget!

Cheers!
Some 12 PLA soldiers dead in both with no territorial changes right ? :lol: Compare it with Aksai Chin lost with thousands of causalities ... and remind us all of the smashing :flame:
 
. .
China is very reasonable and has settled most of its border disputes. Which suggests that indians are unreasonable.

Resolving China's border disputes - upiasia.com

I don't doubt you'd support someone on whose shoulders your existence rests...:coffee:


Occupy our capitals? Really!? What is this link? A CCP mouthpiece? If they had tried occupying our (India, Vietnam, Russia) capitals, there would have been no Reds left today in Chinese government and it would have been split badly into multiple governments claiming different places.

Occupy our capitals indeed. :lol:

Some 12 PLA soldiers dead in both with no territorial changes right ? :lol: Compare it with Aksai Chin lost with thousands of causalities ... and remind us all of the smashing :flame:

12 PLA soldiers? Why not say zero casualties at all? That would further raise your Master's image?After all they are your lifeline and you cannot afford to piss them off. :rolleyes:
 
.
Ok, the reason is out... The talks have been cancelled/postponed because China asked India to stop a budhist confluence scheduled for the same dates in delhi and also asked India to not allow Dalai Lama from speaking in that event. India simply responded that this is an 'unacceptable' demand and cancelled the meetings with China... this is being played at NDTV right now

If this is the correct reason, I can completely understand that stance and respect it... We won't allow dictation on what do we do with our guests, and HH the Dalai Lama is a guest, who is deeply welcome for us... we can't compromise on the basic principles of democracy and and neither on our heritage of 'atithi devobhava' (guest is like a God)
 
.
Indo-China border talks put off: China objects to Dalai Lama's speech in Delhi next week, say sources. - NDTV

LOL! CD, its your country which is crying not ours. :D
 
.
Good. No border talks. :lol:

It was India who was pushing for border talks in the first place, not us.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom