What's new

India 11,000 years back!!!

.
Yes, carbon dating of the structures found under sea, research by national institute of ocean technology are all false.


I have heard there was inconsistencies with that data from 2001. And I believe it was piece of wood that was carbon dated. There are videos of dives under there on the web before I was even born, and last major look into this place is back in the early 2000s, by that author you cite from 2001.

Not even in India, let alone the scientific community abroad is looking into this, for a reason.

Only people that bring this up are -

1.) Indians on the web that cant even tell stylistic differences between historically established Indian empires/eras, and gullible to believe everything on the internet.
2.) Pseudo Historic programs like that Alien show
 
. .
I have heard there was inconsistencies with that data from 2001. And I believe it was piece of wood that was carbon dated. There are videos of dives under there on the web before I was even born, and last major look into this place is back in the early 2000s, by that author you cite from 2001.

Not even in India, let alone the scientific community abroad is looking into this, for a reason.

Only people that bring this up are -

1.) Indians on the web that cant even tell stylistic differences between historically established Indian empires/eras, and gullible to believe everything on the internet.
2.) Pseudo Historic programs like that Alien show
1) The things carbon dated included different objects.
2) There are a lot of things in the world which the scientists and archeolgists have to been able to identify and studies are still underway.
3) Other than discrediting the proof that was provided to you, you've not been able to contribute anything to the thread.
So Mr. Know it all, thank you very much, I do not think I'll be wasting my time replying to your posts anymore.
 
Last edited:
.
1) The things carbon dated included different objects.
2) There are a lot of things in the world which the scientists and archeolgists have to been able to identify and studies are still underway.
3) Other than discrediting the proof that was provided to you, you've not been able to contribute anything to the thread.
So thank you very much, I do not think I'll be wasting my time replying to your posts.

Please, that thing was, 'discovered', before I was even born. Nothing conclusive has come of it since then, at all. These scientist and archaeologist are a lot more learned about these matters than any of us, if both the ones in India and abroad have largely ignored this '11,000' year old piece of civilization, trust me, there's a reason for it. Only ones covering this is history channel's, "Alien shows", that's telling you a lot in itself.
 
.
I am happy for you guys,because i am hopeful that from now on Indians won't claim our IVC anymore because they got something much older than IVC
 
Last edited:
.
I am happy for you guys,because i am hopeful that from now on Indians won't claim our IVC anymore but they got something more older
We don't have to claim it you see. IVC/SSC has been our way of life since last thousands of years. Btw these evidences show that IVC/SSC might have been influenced by the civilisation that existed in 9000BCE.
 
.
We don't have to claim it you see. IVC/SSC has been our way of life since last thousands of years. Btw these evidences show that IVC/SSC might have been influenced by the civilisation that existed in 9000BCE.
Like Mehrgarh
mehrgarh.gif

mehrgarh-6.jpg

Harappa.Reconstruction.jpg
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom