alaungphaya
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2012
- Messages
- 2,176
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
I felt a bit sick reading that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No sir just pointing our the truth
Remember even their Mohamed married a 6yr old and consummated the marriage when she was 9
Haha yeah and people will consider it fundamental rights and freedom of expression pSoon every baighairti in the world would be considered a fundamental right and would be completely legal in this world.
I'm not generalising anything.Don't generalize Muslims. Modern Bangali Muslim culture considers cousin marriages a social taboo. Then again, I can't speak for all remote, rural regions of WB/BD.
1) In north India cousin marriages 're not allowed and ergo you'll see such news evoke malevolent reactions from them.Do you know in our culture we have 15-20+ families in a tribe/clan. All of them are called cousins even though our relationship would be divided by 2-3 generations. You people have a stupid idea of cousin marriages. They are a common place in Pakistan, however you people always take a cousin for a 1st or a 2nd cousin. The kids of my dad's maternal cousin with no direct relation are also regarded as cousins in our culture. My family has over 500-600 people, registered on the book keeping we do on weddings. All of those who are of my age are regarded as my cousins, does'n it mean if i get married to one of them, it becomes cousin marriage?
Regardless of that, in Islam marrying your uncles or aunts daughter is permissible but not mandatory. Even that considered, the union of two parents would be selected from 300-400 individuals therefore its impossible let alone unlikely that two parents in one tribe come from the same set of ancestors because we regularly marry into 'other tribes' as well. Therefore even if you marry your uncles first daughter it doesn't mean a cousin marriage in Hindu understanding of the word since marrying out of one's caste is not permissible. In our cultures your uncles daughter would have a mother from either a distant relative with no direct blood link or from a different tribe altogether.Or your uncle would have a different mother if the grandfather had multiple wives which is also permissible in Islam.
@levina
I'm not here to compare 2 cultures but just to voice my opinion.I know some families where guys and gals get married only to their first cousins.But the condition is that a sister and brother's kids can only get married.And it would be sacriligeous to marry off kids of 2 brothers.
wth???
dont wanna sound judgemental but this thread is weird,,,,amounting to blasphemy imo.
ppl there is huge pool of suitable girls/boys other then ur cousins n sisters/brothers,,,days of electra,odipus r gone,welcome to 2014
Why are people getting upset?
It's an internal matter for Germany. If German society considers it acceptable, it's their choice.
Also, it's wrong to say that it's a slippery slope to pedophilia. Consent between adults is one thing; forcing a child is another.
Perhaps in your house, but certainly not in India
Seem like you have experienced it personally, do you anything about your real father?
- Learn to communicate in proper English before responding to my posts. I don't communicate in gibberish.
- I generally don't respond to personal attacks since it shows the mentality of the idiot leveling such attacks. I therefore suggest that you grow up, take a shower if you are an adult and calm down and take better control of your brain
Lol.
Why do you remind me of the character Parvateshwar from the secrets of Nagas?? (I'm assuming you've read immortals of meluha)
@halupridol -FYI
You know what?
I know some families where guys and gals get married only to their first cousins.But the condition is that a sister and brother's kids can only get married.And it would be sacriligeous to marry off kids of 2 brothers.
Infact I have even heard of a man and woman who were siblings and eloped for obvious reasons.
Indians are sharing wives between brothers because of female foeticide? Shocking!Nope. Only in certain small pockets of rural Haryana perhaps. And that's the price they've to pay for female foeticide. Sharing spouses is still a very taboo subject for the vast majority of all Indians.
This has wider implications for the rest of us 'Europeans', especially when one considers the fate of other similarly controversial issues such as guy marriage and euthanasia (not that I am against either). The trouble is that most institutions that matter in Europe are deeply undemocratic, dominated by liberal nazis who have long taken leave of their senses and have scant regard for the views of those they purportedly represent. It is therefore highly likely that perverisities that get enshrined in statute in one part of the continent would quickly find their way to the rest of the EU.
With regards to consent in incest (if such a thing exists), based on my own limited experience of working with incestuous siblings, such relationships are invariably abusive in one or both directions and are typically the consequence of highly dysfunctional family and social systems (this obviously excludes cases where siblings fostered separately meet by coincidence etc). By normalising such relationships and according them legal sanctity, one runs the risk of not only colluding with and abetting abuse but also perpetuating harm and suffering in any children who might result from such unions.