What's new

In Xi Jinping's effort to make China No. 1, he's forgotten the basics

Most of VN leaders were farmers, too. They also graduated from Soviets universities.

At least they know they r not smart and just humble servant as Ho Chi Minh taught them.
Yes. They are indeed not very smart. If they are as smart as you. VN's economy is at least better than Guangxi province.
 
.
Why are nations who have so far failed to reach the limelight China has achieved are always preaching China the "basics" of everything especially the moronic Indians and the Viets?
 
Last edited:
.
What do u expect from a peasant like Xi who only good at raising pig in Mao's pig farm during Culture revolution ??:lol:

Even Cnese here also admit that Xi is just an uneducated farmer :lol:

-----
30 years political career from a farmer to the leader of China
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/xi-mingze-who-is-chinese-president-xi-jinpings-daughter.671051/page-2
That’s why a country should never be ruled by an educated peasant. Look at Venezuela: ruled by a former bus driver. A rich country turns into a beggar nation.

Xi Jingping will either lead China to a communist paradise or he will lead China into an abyss.

There is nothing in between.
 
.
China just rising will feel push back. It's the first Asian superpower rising in a world dominated by the West. That in itself will make sure it feels significant push back.
 
.
China just rising will feel push back. It's the first Asian superpower rising in a world dominated by the West. That in itself will make sure it feels significant push back.

China does not need to be loved by everyone but what it needs is to offer an "alternative" to the western model the problem China thinks dropping lump sum of loans and investments are one way thats fine but soft power lacks badly
 
.
Yes. They are indeed not very smart. If they are as smart as you. VN's economy is at least better than Guangxi province.
Guangxi make money by begging for US-JP investment since 1979. But US dislike CN now, so 2/3 factories r leaving Guangdong,Guangxi making millions Cnese jobless.

Thats why there r 600 poor starving Cnese plus 205 millions jobless Cnese now. Still can brag how "rich" CN is ?? Pathetic :cool:

China just rising will feel push back. It's the first Asian superpower rising in a world dominated by the West. That in itself will make sure it feels significant push back.
No, CN is falling like Lybia instead, and everyone just want to take advance from the collapse of CN like in Lybia.

Thats why India- Indonesia keep building more industrial parks to lure more investors fleeing from CN to avoid trade war.
 
. .
Wait. I heard that most VNs leaders graduated from Guangxi Normal University. This is real?

From 1951 to 1975, a number of schools in Vietnam were moved to Guilin, including Vietnam Yucai School, Vietnam Special School, Vietnam Special School for Vietnamese to Learn the Chinese Language, and September 2nd School. These schools were collectively referred to as Vietnam Schools and each were established one after another at Guangxi Normal University. During these 24 years, nearly 10,000 young students studied in Guangxi Normal University. After these students returned to Vietnam, most of them became the backbones in various front lines and industries in Vietnam. Among them, the outstanding alumni are:

Tran Dinh Hoan, Member of the Vietnam Political Bureau, Secretariat of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam, and Minister of the Organization Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam;

Deputy Prime Minister Nguyen Manh Cam, Nguyen Cong Dan, Vo Khoan, and Nguyen Thien Nhan;

Nguyen Sinh Hung, former Deputy Prime Minister and Chairman of the National Assembly of Vietnam;

Vo Quoc Hung, Director of Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of Vietnam;

Pham Quoc Anh, Acting Minister of Department of Interior and Assistant to the President;

Ksor Phuoc, Director of Vietnam's Ethnic Affairs Commission;

Doan Manh Giao, Director-general of Vietnam's General Office;

Ho Anh Dung, President of VTV;

Vo Mao, Director of the Council on Foreign Affairs of Vietnamese National Assembly; Tran Van Hang, Member of Vietnamese Central Committee;

and many more. There are more than thirty GXNU graduates who now hold vice-ministerial positions or higher.

https://english.gxnu.edu.cn/4238/listm.htm

Chinese is brainwashed by such fake news.

Such kids had been in China when they were kids, on the way to study in Soviet Uion. Most of them finished Universities in Soviet Union and East Europien Socialist countries.

Its boring when when chinese is lying here.
 
Last edited:
.
Chinese is brainwashed by such fake news.

Such kids had been in China when they were kids, on the way to study in Soviet Uion. Most of them finished Universities in Soviet Union and East Europien Socialist countries.

Its boring when when chinese is lying here.
You calm down first. this is not news. It is just a school profile.

then, trying to change history will not make you look correct.

Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge

426810_342290202520049_2016750692_n.jpg


https://namvietnews.wordpress.com/c...nam-during-the-vietnam-war-the-decisive-edge/

Guangxi make money by begging for US-JP investment since 1979. But US dislike CN now, so 2/3 factories r leaving Guangdong,Guangxi making millions Cnese jobless.

Thats why there r 600 poor starving Cnese plus 205 millions jobless Cnese now. Still can brag how "rich" CN is ?? Pathetic :cool:


No, CN is falling like Lybia instead, and everyone just want to take advance from the collapse of CN like in Lybia.

Thats why India- Indonesia keep building more industrial parks to lure more investors fleeing from CN to avoid trade war.
I'm curious..... How many industrial parks have been established in Vietnam, Indonesia and India. can you introduce?

600 or 600 000 000?
Probably 6000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

But Guangxi really richer than Vietnam.
 
.
You calm down first. this is not news. It is just a school profile.

then, trying to change history will not make you look correct.

Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge

426810_342290202520049_2016750692_n.jpg


https://namvietnews.wordpress.com/c...nam-during-the-vietnam-war-the-decisive-edge/


I'm curious..... How many industrial parks have been established in Vietnam, Indonesia and India. can you introduce?


Probably 6000000000000000000000000000000000000000000.

But Guangxi really richer than Vietnam.
U love posting fake news lile 320,000 Cnese troops in VN, so while should I waste time talking wt a liar?

Show me the pic of merely 1,000 Cnese troops in VN first, if u can.
 
.
June 16, 2020 — 12.00am

Xi Jinping has set China the goal of leading the world in cutting edge technology, but has overlooked the very basics. While the regime is pursuing quantum computing, artificial intelligence and space dominance, it has neglected one of the founding concepts of physics. Isaac Newton's third law says that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

As Xi pushes harder and harder for global dominance, he is provoking a growing pushback. Not just from the US. A growing number of people, countries and organisations are realising that Xi's China is not the China they thought they knew.

4ab235370925c874a9e5b70d61e0fcd3112a4714

Ignoring physics: Chinese President Xi Jinping.CREDIT:AP

The China that had followed Deng Xiaoping's dictum to "hide your brightness, bide your time" for the preceding four decades was given a new direction by Xi: "Strive to achieve." It's no sin to strive. But when you are striving to take territory from your neighbours, sovereignty from your friends, and liberties from people everywhere, you are going to ruffle a few feathers.

Among the latest to awaken is the secretary-general of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg. The North Atlantic Treaty Alliance was forged to protect Europe from Russia. But Stoltenberg has now named China as a threat, too. China was too big a threat for America to manage by itself, the former Norwegian Labour prime minister said in a remarkable speech last week. Beijing was now a threat to democratic values everywhere and a global military force to be reckoned with.


The rise of China is "multiplying the threats to open societies and individual freedoms and increasing the competition over our values and our way of life," he said in remarks to a conference on NATO's purpose for the next decade.

China was not the enemy, he said, yet it was a clear and present danger: "They already have the second-largest defence budget. They are investing heavily in modern military capabilities, including missiles that can reach all NATO-allied countries." As The Economist magazine headlined its report: "NATO sets its sights on China."

8bfacdcfe04023f5387dfc77d162564d476a5893

Illustration: John ShakespeareCREDIT:

And China was no longer an Asia-only military force, according to the NATO chief. China was "coming closer to us", he said, and "we see Chinese forces in the Arctic, in Africa. We see them investing in our critical infrastructure. And they are working more and more together with Russia. All of this has a security consequence for NATO".

Loading






There's no doubt that Stoltenberg was seeking to cut NATO's cloth to fit the political imperative of the times. And because the US is the alliance's principal member, Stoltenberg would know that he'd win Washington's favour by naming China as a security concern.

But it's not just Washington. The major powers of western Europe have grown alarmed about Beijing's intentions too. Germany has toughened its laws to protect companies against Chinese takeover, for instance.

And Britain is rethinking its embrace of China's cyber champion, Huawei. Government MPs have been angered by Beijing's behaviour over the pandemic and forced Prime Minister Boris Johnson to review whether the company will be allowed any part in its 5G network.

acb92e8a1ac8426611dcf64b2633426755e96b7d

Illustration: Andrew DysonCREDIT:

But whatever the politics, putting Beijing at the centre of NATO's concerns is a historic shift. And this point from the secretary-general would be uncomfortable for any American president to hear: "Compared to China, even the US is not the biggest one. Soon China will have the biggest economy in the world, they are leading in investing in a lot of advanced technologies, and including parts of artificial intelligence, quantum computing and so on, then it's even more important that we stand together, North America and Europe together, because we cannot manage this alone."


Stoltenberg said that NATO needed to work more closely with the developed democracies in the Asia-Pacific, "like Australia, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, to defend the global rules and institutions that have kept us safe for decades".

Loading
The G7 is another international outfit that traditionally was unconcerned with China, but it's increasingly worried, too. The group of seven leading industrialised democracies is an Atlantic-centric shop that traditionally talks economics. But last week Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe reportedly proposed that the G7's next summit issue a statement condemning Beijing's plan to extinguish Hong Kong's autonomy.

At the same time, the European Union published a report naming China and Russia for using the pandemic to "cause harm" by launching a "massive wave" of health care hoaxes, online scams, hate speech and coronavirus conspiracy theories on social media.

In the same vein, Twitter last week killed 170,000 Chinese government-linked accounts that were used to push fake news about the Hong Kong protests, coronavirus and the Black Lives Matter demonstrations. Twitter was prompted by research by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.


Xi could be forgiven for thinking that he could get away with an aggressive campaign for dominance. For years, he did as he pleased, broke international laws and encountered no real resistance.

When Barack Obama told him to stop seizing disputed maritime territories from China's neighbours, Xi ignored him and paid no price. When pressed, he promised Obama that China would not militarise those territories in the South China Sea. He went ahead anyway. And paid no price.

He found that he could build a complex of concentration camps for the persecution of a million of the Uighur people of Xinjiang, and yet continue to be courted in capitals across the world.

And who knows? Perhaps he will get away with a great deal more yet. But day by day, the world is awakening and Xi's thrusts are generating a wider resistance and even some pushback. It's only physics.

https://www.smh.com.au/national/in-...e-s-forgotten-the-basics-20200615-p552pk.html

Just a BS article from a USA 'TC' - in fact just reminds me 'the pot is calling the kettle black'.
 
. .
That’s why a country should never be ruled by an educated peasant. Look at Venezuela: ruled by a former bus driver. A rich country turns into a beggar nation.

Xi Jingping will either lead China to a communist paradise or he will lead China into an abyss.

There is nothing in between.
Actually, in communist theory and Ho chi minh thought, the party is not for Ruling people, it just instruct what to do to make things better and protect people against the enemies. ( HCM told that the communist party is just the servant of people).

Thats why Xi, Kim and Venezuela leaders r going wrong way when trying to force the people to do what they want the people to do.

And the consequences : Rich Cnese investors like Luxshare, lenovo, TCL etc r leaving CN cos they r rich and smart. They cant accept some dumb peasant, who only good at raising pigs in Mao's pig farm to lecture them what to do.
 
. .
China does not need to be loved by everyone but what it needs is to offer an "alternative" to the western model the problem China thinks dropping lump sum of loans and investments are one way thats fine but soft power lacks badly

Yes but I think China is working on the soft power by developing its media. It has a long way to go.

I think China right now is like a cornered tiger, it is prepared to start snarling and biting back. It's not going to sit around and wait for weaker countries like India, Australia, Japan to take a bite while the US directs it. Any hostility displayed by these countries will be returned five fold by China. I think the US severely underestimates China and the Trump administration has significantly underestimated China's resolve and capabilities. Right now China will work to maintain some stability with its relationship with the US as it is still the weaker power, but once China achieves technological independence (which will happen in 5 years) and economic and tech superiority (which MAY happen in 10-15 years), China will be absolutely vicious against the US if it continues its pattern of hostility.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom