No!
This wasn't Hindu-Sikh riot! Yes, Hindus can be accused of not standing up for their brothers, the Sikhs, but the violence was mainly in congress ruled states. Congress and its leaders were the main instigators in all of this. Even Khushwant Singh, the most congress leaning Sikh of those times admits (in his article Victory to the Mob) to BJP leaders such as VAjpayee and Ram Jethmalani going out of their way to save thousands of sikhs. If this was a communal thing, bjp would have been at the forefront of "protecting" Hindu rights as was the case in Babri.
Please see below:
It must be acknowledged that some leaders of the Sangh Parivar and the RSS, including A.B.Vajpayee, went out of their way to help the Sikhs. So, did men like Ram Jethmalani, Soli Sorabjee and a few others."
Sangh saved thousands of Sikhs from being massacred on that fateful day, When my dad was transferred to Delhi and I went to nearby Shakha, when this discussion came up one day, I was told how Pracharaks and Swayamsevaks hid the Sikhs in their houses to save them from Congress goons.
The Hindu non reaction can be attributed to Bindrawale and his own anti-Hindu stance and killings that lost a lot of capital towards the larger Sikh community. RSS inaction to save sikhs on the larger front may have been motivated by this. Wrong as it was, inaction is not the same as killing. I repeat, this wasn't a Hindu - Sikh riot, this was a congress-Sikh riot!
There is no winning in this game, it's just point scoring.
The days of war are done, now is the era of destabilization and economic strangulation.
The problem with Pakistan and ISI is that it's stuck in the era where war and destruction was the only way to settle scores. Once Pakistan moves out of its military mindset and realizes that what funds the military is more important than the military itself, it will be playing an even game with India.