NG Missile Vessels
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2023
- Messages
- 1,600
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 948228
View attachment 948229
LCA-MK-1A with Digital RWR
View attachment 948220
View attachment 948222
View attachment 948223
View attachment 948224
View attachment 948225
@CallSignMaverick @Raj-Hindustani @protean @indushek @Hellfire2006 @mig25 @migflug @Skull and Bones @hari sud @hembo
MK IA is not good enough against the Chinese threats, but, it should be able to do the job on the western borders. It would be a worthy fighter and definitely better than the older JF variants. Latest JF may be neck to neck with MK IA in few aspects.
If it’s radar is good enough, then newer missiles can be easily integrated considering our home grown AA missile program is doing very well. It’s payload and combat range would remain a handicap in the long run.
Overall, it appears to be a good way to move forward, till MK II comes into the picture.
MK1A will be primarily used for Pakistan and will also relive Su30 MKI from the western border. MK2 would be used against ChinaMK IA is not good enough against the Chinese threats, but, it should be able to do the job on the western borders. It would be a worthy fighter and definitely better than the older JF variants. Latest JF may be neck to neck with MK IA in few aspects.
If it’s radar is good enough, then newer missiles can be easily integrated considering our home grown AA missile program is doing very well. It’s payload and combat range would remain a handicap in the long run.
Overall, it appears to be a good way to move forward, till MK II comes into the picture.
Would or will?View attachment 948228
View attachment 948229
LCA-MK-1A with Digital RWR
View attachment 948220
View attachment 948222
View attachment 948223
View attachment 948224
View attachment 948225
@CallSignMaverick @Raj-Hindustani @protean @indushek @Hellfire2006 @mig25 @migflug @Skull and Bones @hari sud @hembo
HAL currently has backlog of 90 Tejas ie 73 MK1A and 17 Trainers
With a production rate of 16 aircraft a year, it will take them till 2028 to complete the current orders.
HAL has promised to increase the production rate to 24 aircraft per year by 2026,
but that would still mean that a second Tranche of 97 MK1A/B will only start entering service in 2028-29 with delivery continuing till 2031-32
The production rate has to be increased to 32 Aircraft a year if we want win export contracts and supply IAF on time, but what can you do about the idiots who run HAL
These are the same people who took 16 yrs to supply 182 Su30MKI, while Russia took 7 yrs to deliver 90 Su30MKI at a cheaper rate.
I dont see Tejas MK2 entering service before 2032
Lol yeah your Tej@$$ mk 1a has RCS of f22 Pakistani radars and awacs can't see this samosa lol