Hehehe. I am baffled, truly baffled. A piece of fired AIM 120 proves what!!! Share with us your marvelous insight.
By the way, in a way it proves that a SU30 was downed by AIM 120.
Indians are funny creatures and they live in universe of their own. They seem to think that the world is all that is shown in Bollywood and they can shout Josh Josh.
Its been many years since I have been on forums but Indians have not changed. they sound like teenagers who have just discovered puberty.
In regards to their claim of F-16 being shot down and AIM-120 C. Well it only requires logical approach to see how absurd they are in their claim. So it might be easier to work this out in simple way.
Indian claim:
AIM-120C was found at the scene of dog fight and they further claim that 4 AIM-120C were fired.
So what does that show? Well First of all AIM-120 is BVR and not WVR, it has a range for 105+km thus it is clear that F-16 was not involved in dog fight otherwise WVR would have been used and not BVR. This effectively show that F-16, even if used, were long distance away.
Only thing AIM-120C shows that the there fired at some Indian Plane.
They than claim that MIG-21 shot down F-16 and that Abi nan done had radio the message that he has sight of the target before he went silent. Which, if one is to accept this, shows that the plane was close by. But that well does not conform with their claim that AIM-120C was used. Why would F-16 be this close to the border when it can effectively be anywhere up to 80+km away and yet still engage targets. Especially when they are claiming that BVR was used, why would F-16 use BVR and not WVR.
If one is to further analysis this they also want us to accept that perhaps f-16 were far away that would explain AIM-120C usage but some however, they magically got close to LOC and Mig-21 sneaked upto F-16 to have it locked and fire WVR. They also seems to ignore that AWAC was being used thus their MIG-21 could not hide away from F-16 or other planes and that is why it was shot down.
They than say why did ISPR lied? well take it they did lie so what??? didnt india originally claimed that their planes are accounted for and that PAF was lying but that slowly change. So what should one take from that.
Their egos are hurt and they are trying to justify their existence. They were ranting their superiority for close to 2 decades, especially since they inducted SU-30 MKI. I have been hearing about their super duper MKI since 2003.
They again fail to explain why didnt they send MKI's to teach PAF a lesson when PAF have just carried out a raid and shot down their tea boy?
Did Indian destroy anything in balakot?
Indians here and in their media have made many claims about hitting targets or killing ex-amount of people. Yet they could not provide any evidence of that.
Normally when military carries out strikes especially when it wants to show the world what it has done the military makes sure that it has all assets including satellites in place to record this event. Example of this is USA attack on Syria after chemical attacks.
now India is claiming to be the next big thing in space, one must give them credit that they have done great in this area. It claims to have many military satellites and they claim to have resolution of 0.8m.
They could have had their satellites in the right position when carrying out the attacks and they have a record of that attach to show the world. yet none exists.
They could have taken pictures of bodies on ground and them being moved of there being other people in the area.
it either means that their satellites are useless or they are telling a hogwash storey.
this can also apply to their claim of F-16 being shot down. they know where F-16 might have been shot down thus they could have done Arial search for the crash site keeping in mind even if the plane was remove it would still have left marks such as burn marks, disturbed soil and damaged trees. Yet they fail to provide any of that evidence.
