Kompromat
ADMINISTRATOR
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 40,366
- Reaction score
- 416
- Country
- Location
With all due respect , i would hardly call this a sneak peak. IAF has done everything to the aircraft , just short of stripping it down.
They have evaluated it on technical basis for MMRCA.
They have had access to manufacturer privy information.
Such as actually using the F-16 as part of the Air force and other technical details.
They have flown the plane.
They have flown against it.
They have talked to pilots of F-16's .
In the Exercises alone , they have develop tactics to improve their odd's against the F-16.
This is not a sneak , or peak.
We went to the whole show , and even got on stage.
Evaluating a fighter jet to its limit is really an advantage to develop your tactics but it cannot be matched with flying in a real time combat mission.
IAF must have flew the aircraft , they have info about the hardware because of MMRCA but again they dont have any idea about our home grown tactics.
That is very true , Pilots make the machine . But there is only that much that the PAF pilots can do with their machines.
There is alot more than what a pilot can do with its machine within its limitations , history tells us that Gnats were better than sabres but they didn't stand a chance against outnumbered sabre pilots.
A pilot can change the game in seconds , you are right when you say that the hardware has limitations but what pilot does to that plane and how it is used in a combat is not limited.
You can do things differently , but you are always bound by the inherent limitations of the machine. PAF pilots may have a surprise or two. But IAF has thoroughly mapped the capabilities of the plane.
Its truly and advantage on paper and in training .
Mig-29 - can i get some info plz , when did PAk evaluate.
Back in 90's we were offered Ukranian MIG-29's and SU-27 Flankers and they were evaluated in Pakistan.
Migs stayed in Pakistan for sometime while it was flown and flown against for a considerable time to judge its capabilities - it was refused because it was inferior to what we already had.
Su-30MKK- It is not the MKI , sub systems are different and airframe is slightly different.
Only Considerable Difference between MKK and MKI is a TVC Engine , Canards , Radar and Israeli Avinoics in MKI.
Besides MKI is an Export name for MKK while the Platform is the same - good enough to know ins and outs of the basic design and its limitations.
We have Evaluated-J-11B/J-10/Rafale/EF/F/A-18 Hornet/F-16 E/F , JAS-39 Gripen , over the years which gives us an experience against MMRCA..
For record : F/A-18 Hornet was offered to Pakistan but was rejected while F-16 was preferred.
Rafale was evaluated in Pakistan few years back and it participated in an exercise against our Mirages .
F-16 E/F is flown by PAF pilots on forign deployments in UAE.
EF was eveluated by ex PAF chief Tanveer mehmud ahmad in UK.
JAS-39 was eveluated few years ago when PAF was considering to buy the aircraft.
* which means that the only air craft in MMRCA we have not flown and Eveluated yet is MIG-35
Regards: