Gentlemen consider two points;
First: A war is looming with India and Gen. Bajwa is a well-deserving well-performing man on the chair. Changing him was a procedural change instead of ask of the situation. If he was removed, many things in the hierarchy had shifted here and there and that was an unasked changed, not benefiting the security situation of Pakistan. Who doesn't agree?
Second: People who are in jails (Nawaz family, Zardari family and more) when were requesting Americans for help, Americans responded they should wait in jails until there is a change in the leadership. The corrupt sitting in the jails holding on to their looted money in hope of negotiation as things change. By keeping Gen. Bajwa IK has denied everyone this opportunity.
On the question of revisiting your stances, I am a software designer and I make rules and break them myself when the situation asks for it. In Psychology, we learn "context is the king" and hoping to serve humanity better, we make rules and break them when the situation asks for it. I find IK has done the same.