Going by your own definition of "who is Hindu" ....... this devdasi thing is purely indian ......... or else your definition of Hindu is not correct, Hindu is a religion then and not people. You cannot be selective, it has to be blanket and the practices are part of the package, even this indian girl marrying an old Omani is a Hindu thing ...... so what is it doc? Your definition is flawed or you are selective?
And you really need to do proper search before you keep parroting Mutah and Misyar again and again ........ for the time being I would suffice (because of your silence on who introduced it as a religious thing) by saying that this
indian marrying an old Omani is neither ..........
@SarthakGanguly your rating a post is taken as your agreement with content of the post. Thank you, but I would have appreciated if you could call me porki on my face, I don't mind the labels especially when given by bigot hypocrite shameless cuckoo sanghis, but the lack of courage to say it directly to my face is unacceptable for me, I look at it as a cowardly act. This isn't a complaint but FYI.
Won't blame the idiot who posted that ..... I have respect for his mother ...... she must be a brave lady who had to carry such an ignorant insecure imbecile for nine months.