What's new

Hyderabad 1948 | India's hidden massacre.

. . .
The part about Indian Army is pretty much exaggerated.

I have spoken to old colleges and lecturers in my college (I live in Hyderabad) off the record and everyone
has only one thing to say - the incidents of IA soldiers unjustifiably killing or aiding the killing of muslims
are very scarce and are mostly the result of personal vendetta, there were never any orders to carry
out such acts by the soldiers' superiors.

80-90% of the time IA only looked to it that muslim extremist leagues who's only purpose of existence
was to destabilize the newly independent state were suppressed and law & order maintained. There
were instances (one involving a retired prof. of our college being a live witness) where IA soldiers had
shot an armed Hindu group member in the leg to stop them from attacking unarmed muslim civilians.
 
.
If it was the case the local Hindu population would have revolted against him and they had the right to do so.

The funniest excuse you put forward nullify the above because its amusing why only after partition this excuse came to surface.

The report said



But Hyderabad's Muslim Nizam, or prince, insisted on remaining independent. This outraged the new country's mainly Hindu leaders in New Delhi.

After an acrimonious stand-off between Delhi and Hyderabad, the government finally lost patience.

In addition to their desire to prevent an independent Muslim-led state taking root in the heart of predominantly Hindu India was another worry.


Members of the powerful Razakar militia, the armed wing of Hyderabad's most powerful Muslim political party, were terrorising many Hindu villagers.

This gave the Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, the pretext he needed. In September 1948 the Indian Army invaded Hyderabad.


In what was rather misleadingly known as a "police action" the Nizam's forces were defeated after just a few days without any significant loss of civilian lives. But word then reached Delhi that arson, looting, and the mass murder and rape of Muslims had followed the invasion


Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-...948-indias-hidden-massacre.html#ixzz2fnGFbyFJ



Just a question to Indians here about the RED PART. does it give any excuse to Indian Army or any Army to invade another country??

@Aeronaut Please approve my Post.

@Spring Onion, I don't really understand how u are unable to get the point unless u deliberately want to do so.

The hordes of Qasim Rizwi came after not before Independence and plans of India to annex Hyderabad. The atrocities they committed on Villages are heinous to say the least. In the name of religion if u want to ignore them and take up selectively what followed then there is no point in discussing.

When Nizam gave his first and last Radio Broadcast he categorically mentioned that Qasim Rizwi held no post in his govt and he took up the charge under force.

Why would the general populace revolt when the Nizam was maintaining things ??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
The muslims of Hyderabad might have moved on to some extent but Kashmiris still fact September 1948 type situation by Indian troops 365 days of the year.

Not saying that things are very smooth in Hyderabad too.
 
.
I have seen the amount of hatred they have. Boy o boy they hate Hindus more than any Pakistani would. The sense of a lost privilege to rule Hindus is the biggest insult to them. But in 1948 the Hindus did not make the mistake of sparing most of these pests. Most of them were put to death. Not even raped! Shows how much hatred the population had for its ruling class. Only a few survived. Some even had to escape all the way to Pakistan!

Terrorists have no right to live. Be it TTP or Razakars or LTTE - they have only one solution. :devil:
Okay , Okay, Very Well Said . But I Object About LTTE . The LTTe & Velu Pillai Is Like A Hero To Tamil's. They're way may be was very violent , but what they did ,is to gain their right that they deserve. So LTTE are freedom fighters.
 
.
in 47/48 Pakistan was NOT having enough weapons for our defence how could even supply them. even if that is true does it give Indian army license to Kill Muslims in Hyderabad a state which India intended to include in its territory by force.



Above all Indian Army representing Indian State and taking part in genocide of Muslims in Hyderabad while arming Hindus proves that Indian Army is part of Hindu extremist mindset.

yes they are and why should they not be?

Pakistani army has its mullahs and islamists.

If it was the case the local Hindu population would have revolted against him and they had the right to do so.

The funniest excuse you put forward nullify the above because its amusing why only after partition this excuse came to surface.

The report said


But Hyderabad's Muslim Nizam, or prince, insisted on remaining independent. This outraged the new country's mainly Hindu leaders in New Delhi.

After an acrimonious stand-off between Delhi and Hyderabad, the government finally lost patience.

In addition to their desire to prevent an independent Muslim-led state taking root in the heart of predominantly Hindu India was another worry.


Members of the powerful Razakar militia, the armed wing of Hyderabad's most powerful Muslim political party, were terrorising many Hindu villagers.

This gave the Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, the pretext he needed. In September 1948 the Indian Army invaded Hyderabad.

In what was rather misleadingly known as a "police action" the Nizam's forces were defeated after just a few days without any significant loss of civilian lives. But word then reached Delhi that arson, looting, and the mass murder and rape of Muslims had followed the invasion

Source: Hyderabad 1948 | India's hidden massacre.



Just a question to Indians here about the RED PART. does it give any excuse to Indian Army or any Army to invade another country??

of course it does,come on biba u r a pathani,why r u asking rhetorical questions?

ahhhhhh So you finally came to the point ;)

So Indian army committing mass murder of Muslims, mass rape of Muslims in an independent state of Hyderabad is justified and Pakistan giving support to natives who revolted against the brutal maharaja is NOT justified ??

:)))))))))))

is the same thing.

I completely agree that Maharaja Hari Singh was ruling over a majority muslim population,but it is secure for India to control your rivers,laaton ki bhoot baaton se nahi manta.

The muslims of Hyderabad might have moved on to some extent but Kashmiris still fact September 1948 type situation by Indian troops 365 days of the year.

Not saying that things are very smooth in Hyderabad too.

Things are very very smooth in Hyd deccan,it has a lot of engineering colleges/software companies and a great airport,defence/aero and biotech industry too,

is an amazing place,thats what the hindus of coastal andhra made it.
 
Last edited:
.
Things are very very smooth in Hyd deccan,it has a lot of engineering colleges/software companies and a great airport,defence/aero and biotech industry too,

is an amazing place,thats what the hindus of coastal andhra made it.

That doesn't change and hide all the bloodshed that what happened when it was occupied.
 
.
Trust me,people are still angry on the Nizam.

In every village nobody likes him,he had always allied with Delhi whether the Mughals or the British to enjoy power,so it is natural people lash out at him.

And now Asaduddin Owaisi is also under fire,they ll always be seen as an invader man.

They dont speak the native language Telugu and are alien in every way.
 
. . .
Don't know who to blame. But, right after partition, British govt offered protection against any aggression from Indian govt to State of Hyderabad. But, Nawab ruled out such protection from British Governor Gen. British knew what will Hindus do to Muslims once they leave India.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom