What's new

Huawei Australia says ban is a ‘slap in the face’ to China

only poor african countries, and few other slaves will be under pressure of debt to adopt huwei 5g .
You really believe and know what you are saying.
Think logically. Why would poor African countries wants 5G when 2G and 3G is already more than sufficient?
Is Morocco a poor African nation?
:coffee: :cheers::sarcastic::sarcastic:
 
You really believe and know what you are saying.
Think logically. Why would poor African countries wants 5G when 2G and 3G is already more than sufficient?
Is Morocco a poor African nation?
:coffee: :cheers::sarcastic::sarcastic:


for the same reason why poor srilankans were forced to cede srilanka's port for 99 years because they got in net of chinese debt trap .
 
it very difficult to comprehend for economic slaves under debt what is economic freedom . free thinking works when you are not under obligation to toe the line of your debter .

It's equally difficult to imagine a country with averege iq of 82 and the smartest among them would make living out of country as the life time goal, would make any meaningful effort to enter modern world, with or without "freedom".
 
What I am saying is: What Trump and Australia did went against the principle of FREE trade. In the years to follow, this is return to haunt USA.
Be careful what they wished for.
China will become the perfect competitors they ever wished for.

In fact in her own ways, China is happy about it because by a stroke of a pen, Chinese homegrown semiconductor industries are given a lifeline.

China should be more discreet and protective in promoting their high technologies esp. to India.
In fact China huge domestic demand at home is more than sufficient to generate the revenue needed for advance R&D.
That was how Huawei grew originally.
Be selective with who they shared the technology with.
 
Lol. CCP bots only parrot what was but never what to be.

Europe is showing Huawei the exit

There has never been such anti-China sentiment in the world than it is today. But you can parrot Xitler, the savior narrative.
only a CCP bot would believe that development only entails shiny buildings and roads. And to think you can surmon someone who had been lot more developed for lot longer time than China is quite amusing and quizzical.

CCP bots should stop advising and do introspecting for their own good.
What is development in your skewed term? war? mass rape? filth? lynching? poverty?
 
for the same reason why poor srilankans were forced to cede srilanka's port for 99 years because they got in net of chinese debt trap .

Which is as usual Western anti-China BS and propaganda?

In fact it was the difficulty in her repayment of USD12.7 billion loans owing to EU banks that make Sri Lanka Government to propose leasing Hambantota Port to China.
Debt repayment of Hambantota port constitutes less than 5% of Sri Lanka annual service repayment.
Is that a crime? Sri Lanka have a property they wanted to lease to China and when China agree, they entrapped her or you would rather Sri Lanka default and gets downgrade in her rating by Fiinch or Moody.
Sri Lanka owes China USS1.12 billion that was contra with the lease of the port with another additional 200 million payment made by the Chinese side.
So stop your unsubstantiated allegation.
Next time researched and checked before you post your silly opinion.

Here is one of the many articles I have read.
 
Which is as usual Western anti-China BS and propaganda?

In fact it was the difficulty in her repayment of USD12.7 billion loans owing to EU banks that make Sri Lanka Government to propose leasing Hambantota Port to China.
Debt repayment of Hambantota port constitutes less than 5% of Sri Lanka annual service repayment.
Is that a crime? Sri Lanka have a property they wanted to lease to China and when China agree, they entrapped her or you would rather Sri Lanka default and gets downgrade in her rating by Fiinch or Moody.
Sri Lanka owes China USS1.12 billion that was contra with the lease of the port with another additional 200 million payment made by the Chinese side.
So stop your unsubstantiated allegation.
Next time researched and checked before you post your silly opinion.

Here is one of the many articles I have read.
It's an entrapment when you indulge with their leadership in building marquee projects with no economic value. Like CPEC or Hambantota.
 
Lol. my reference was towards Australia. But development definitely doesn't entails getting crushed below a tank.
It's the same? what entails development for australia? poverty?increase in crime? lower living standard? Who in Australia got crushed below a tank?
 
It's an entrapment when you indulge with their leadership in building marquee projects with no economic value. Like CPEC or Hambantota.
So its is your opinion China agrees to lease and operates a port with no economic value? :cheers: :sarcastic::sarcastic::sarcastic:
So it is of no concern to Sri Lanka now, right. She has already leased it away.
So what precisely is your problem?
 
China should ignore it.

If China keeps innovating, it's Australia who is actually banning themselves.
 
This means that Australians can be targeted and killed by the US like Iranian generals. I don't think that's a problem.

The real problem is countries that are worried about being targeted and wiretapped by the US.American dogs have no problem with this.
 
Australia should be reminded which continent it is in. Australia is nothing but a white Congo.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom