How Western media would cover Baltimore if it happened elsewhere

[Indus Pakistan]

The stupidity on his thread is mind boggling ,even for PDF posters.I mean ,comparing toilette paper looters who riot in the name of some dead drug dealer with social issues regarding economic reforms in Ukraine or social ones in China is just retarded.But then again,many posters in here are retarded.

Btw,don't bother in insulting my country as a sort of "answer" ,i grew imune to such tactics used by most intelectual plancton on this forum.Jesus retards,grow up,you're a laughing stock with such articles.Only desperate haters with the IQ of sewer rats buy this kind of stuff.

What is your problem? Your not even a bloody American. Nobody here is saying Black African's were right in doing what they did. Non of us here are in Baltimore and non of us is qualified to judge the situation other than say it was not right to go around looting on the flimsy excuse of inequity. The point of this thread is that of taking a look at the the incident by using the typical prism of the US or Western media. I thought it was rather funny and satire at it's best. Often a story has two sides. It made the point nicely.

You however clearly failed to comprehend this subtlety and in doing so exposed your lack of intellectuel fibre. Clearly if you are Romanian I hope you do not represent the typical Romanian far if you do Romania has got big problem with sewer rats.

 

[TaiShang]

That's true but that doesn't mean its right to oppress them.

Exactly. It is surprising that while the US regime has a lot to say about others' "human" rights problems, it cannot properly respond to its own "civil" rights problems.

Maybe the starting point of the crisis is the fact that it is a "human" rights problem rather and a merely "civil" rights problem.

I love how the US regime plays with terms and change perceptions.

We got to learn from them. Seriously.

 

[cirr]

Exactly. It is surprising that while the US regime has a lot to say about others' "human" rights problems, it cannot properly respond to its own "civil" rights problems.

Maybe the starting point of the crisis is the fact that it is a "human" rights problems rather and a merely "civil" rights problem.

I love how the US regime plays with terms and change perceptions.

We got to learn from them. Seriously.

I would go further and describe it as an uprising against a political system i.e. the US regime that looks legitimate on the surface but is illegitimate at the core。

 

[TaiShang]

I would go further and describe it as an uprising against a political system i.e. the US regime that looks legitimate on the surface but is illegitimate at the core。

Definitely. Although geographically confined, it is an uprising that has been violently suppressed by excessively armed military-police and a week-long curfew.

No body knows whether the looters are secret service implants to de-legitimize the otherwise rightful protests and riots.

 

[cirr]

Definitely. Although geographically confined, it is an uprising that has been violently suppressed by excessively armed military-police and a week-long curfew.

No body knows whether the looters are secret service implants to de-legitimize the otherwise rightful protests and riots.

Democracy is only valid at the grassroot level（village and township at most）。

There is absolutely NO sense in a stranger’s voting into a country's highest office another stranger。

Gaining simple YES majority of valid votes cast is NOT enough nor democracy。A candidate wins an election only when over 50% of the WHOLE electorate（i.e. all voters who vote or choose not to）vote in his or her favour。In short，suffrage should not force one to vote。

The majority of the so-called democratically elected goverments lose their legitimacy soon after the election，as their approval ratings drop below the 50% threshold。

 

[flamer84]

What is your problem?

Posting while being inebriated.It happens sometimes.