What's new

How to wipe out Indian Paws

Exactly mate, we just talk big.

I think all south Asian nations should unite and destroy India once and for all and be done with it!

:china: :pakistan:
Hope they will attack us as soon as possible.I am eagerly waiting.These evil yindoos must be destroyed.
 
. .
No we are peacefull neighbours and want to promote love and peace


Yeah Aamir Ajmal Kasab and his friends are the ambassdors of your love and peace promoting which you sent them to Mumbai.

GB

---------- Post added at 05:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:47 PM ----------

@ Most of the key posts are now being held by the Hindus.

In India right from Commissioner to General and right from a Magistrate to President posts are held by Muslims and we never complain.

Besides last time I checked Bangladesh was a secular country.

So what is your problem again?

GB

---------- Post added at 05:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:49 PM ----------

Hope they will attack us as soon as possible.I am eagerly waiting.These evil yindoos must be destroyed.

Do wake me up when the attack is on.

GB
 
.
Please don't use Dettol while cleaning our Paws.Lifebuoy is better.
Regards
Lohith_Pg25_pic.jpg
 
.
The more I see the Indian attitude towards its neighbours, the more I realise the reasons behind the partitions. And again, I can't really blame them as the society is deeply affected with a caste system. I wouldn't really have a problem with such arrogant people even if some of the claims they make were true. The facts have it the other way: India has 1/3 of the world's poverty.
I am behind Mujib and AL behind 1971 stance. I support Bangladesh's independence, but I think the Indian assistance was nothing but a great loss for us and honestly given the deep cultural difference between bangladesh and pakistan, the creation of Bangladesh was inevitable, sooner or later. That is why I believe India's help is cursed. They tell us they helped us in the war and we should be grateful to this people, but one look at the famine in 1975 will tell you a different story. It has been a well documented fact (I know the Indians will deny this) India played a great role in creating a famine in 1975 and it is a fact that india was reluctant to help us at all. I don't blame the role on India 100% because it was the people of AL who was smuggling out all the relief and donations we received.
and Again I must make myself clear that I don't really blame or hold any grudges for India's action because it did what it did for its own benefit and given the level of poverty there(back then), it is expected. But what I have a problem with is the Indian attitude that it is behind the creation of Bangladesh and how it dismantled the Pakistani army in two days with their superior technology and it did because it is a great country which cared for the people of Bangladesh and they had no strategic interest and they had no opportunist intentions and they are a good neighbour who just happens to live in a bad neighbourhood.

Which partition ?..first one or the second one? It is you who people are not capable of living with any one..you could not live in India(because you could not comprehend living in a Hindu majority sate).. and then you could not live with Pakistanis(as they did not like your culture) ...Where as in India ..we live as one no matter the cultural or religious differences.. that's why we are still united and you are not.

It was ten million of you who came to us for help and not the other way around...we fed you, protected you, trained you and gave you the means of fighting back and even fought and died for your cause.
Yes we had a motive behind helping you ..we wanted to get even for Pakistani antics of 65 ..but in the end it was you who benefited..we did not keep an inch of land we captured for ourselves but gave it all to you.

Now if you are not Thank full, for us saving your lives that is just because it is who you are..and we can live with that...but don't make the mistake of making India your enemy..because you can not afford an enemy like India.
 
. .
Expected answer: "We can't, but we know someone who can".

no no we never let someone use our shoulder for his gun stand lolz

---------- Post added at 03:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:30 PM ----------

Please don't use Dettol while cleaning our Paws.Lifebuoy is better.
Regards
Lohith_Pg25_pic.jpg

kuty ko detol se bath karay gay ab kya?:eek:
 
. . .
no no we never let someone use our shoulder for his gun stand lolz

---------- Post added at 03:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:30 PM ----------



kuty ko detol se bath karay gay ab kya?:eek:
I did what happened to her later is offtopic.
 
. . . .
The more I see the Indian attitude towards its neighbours, the more I realise the reasons behind the partitions. And again, I can't really blame them as the society is deeply affected with a caste system. I wouldn't really have a problem with such arrogant people even if some of the claims they make were true. The facts have it the other way: India has 1/3 of the world's poverty.

Lets not poke into India's problems :lol:

I am behind Mujib and AL behind 1971 stance. I support Bangladesh's independence, but I think the Indian assistance was nothing but a great loss for us and honestly given the deep cultural difference between bangladesh and pakistan, the creation of Bangladesh was inevitable, sooner or later. That is why I believe India's help is cursed. They tell us they helped us in the war and we should be grateful to this people, but one look at the famine in 1975 will tell you a different story. It has been a well documented fact (I know the Indians will deny this) India played a great role in creating a famine in 1975 and it is a fact that india was reluctant to help us at all. I don't blame the role on India 100% because it was the people of AL who was smuggling out all the relief and donations we received.

A tall claim. Some sources would be helpful. India wasn't economically that strong compared to now. Also, they had a serious problem of refugees from East Pakistan.

If you are a supporter of an independent Bangladesh, how on earth would the Mukti Bahini fight alone? One can't fight a professional military with WWII era rifles, grenades, and some basic training. They were no match. I know the Indians did conduct Special Forces and intelligence operations at the time in East Pakistan, but that is a different story, and it was one hell of a well conducted operation.

You are right about the AL looting part. That is a fact.

and Again I must make myself clear that I don't really blame or hold any grudges for India's action because it did what it did for its own benefit and given the level of poverty there(back then), it is expected. But what I have a problem with is the Indian attitude that it is behind the creation of Bangladesh and how it dismantled the Pakistani army in two days with their superior technology and it did because it is a great country which cared for the people of Bangladesh and they had no strategic interest and they had no opportunist intentions and they are a good neighbour who just happens to live in a bad neighbourhood.

Bengal always had some level of poverty. Even during the British era. You have to look back as to why the All India Muslim League was created in the first place. Most of Bengal's aristocrats were Hindus, Muslims simply didn't want to integrate with Western knowledge and know how. And yes, there was some discrimination. Generally speaking, Bengali Muslims had little or no education, and that problem still runs high today.

Have we progressed as individuals and generations throughout the years until now? Yes. Our generations have come very far. The Liberation War did help us in that path to go faster. But the question is, why is Bangladesh still poor? I think you know the answers.

The IAF at the time of the Liberation War wasn't as...awesome as the PAF, but it's Eastern front had a very weakly defended airspace. The PAF was pretty much owned there. With Pakistan losing both air and naval advantages in the Eastern front, their army were just holed up in face of the upcoming Indian blitzkrieg. The result wasn't pretty for the Pakistanis, and surrendered to IA in the end. You see, it wasn't only a military success, it was a covert, some propaganda and political success. It was a brilliantly planned strategy from the Indians. West Pakistani arrogance only strengthened the Indian strategy. What can I say, beautiful, just beautiful!

It isn't only because of India that is the root cause of our problems. India just reaps whatever benefits they see. There is no such thing as 'quality control' in Indian politics. This similarly applies to Bangladesh.

As far as the transit deal goes, I think it is feasible in the long term provided that political football in Bangladesh doesn't hinder the benefits. It has pros and cons.
 
.
Lets not poke into India's problems :lol:



A tall claim. Some sources would be helpful. India wasn't economically that strong compared to now. Also, they had a serious problem of refugees from East Pakistan.

If you are a supporter of an independent Bangladesh, how on earth would the Mukti Bahini fight alone? One can't fight a professional military with WWII era rifles, grenades, and some basic training. They were no match. I know the Indians did conduct Special Forces and intelligence operations at the time in East Pakistan, but that is a different story, and it was one hell of a well conducted operation.

You are right about the AL looting part. That is a fact.



Bengal always had some level of poverty. Even during the British era. You have to look back as to why the All India Muslim League was created in the first place. Most of Bengal's aristocrats were Hindus, Muslims simply didn't want to integrate with Western knowledge and know how. And yes, there was some discrimination. Generally speaking, Bengali Muslims had little or no education, and that problem still runs high today.

Have we progressed as individuals and generations throughout the years until now? Yes. Our generations have come very far. The Liberation War did help us in that path to go faster. But the question is, why is Bangladesh still poor? I think you know the answers.

The IAF at the time of the Liberation War wasn't as...awesome as the PAF, but it's Eastern front had a very weakly defended airspace. The PAF was pretty much owned there. With Pakistan losing both air and naval advantages in the Eastern front, their army were just holed up in face of the upcoming Indian blitzkrieg. The result wasn't pretty for the Pakistanis, and surrendered to IA in the end. You see, it wasn't only a military success, it was a covert, some propaganda and political success. It was a brilliantly planned strategy from the Indians. West Pakistani arrogance only strengthened the Indian strategy. What can I say, beautiful, just beautiful!

It isn't only because of India that is the root cause of our problems. India just reaps whatever benefits they see. There is no such thing as 'quality control' in Indian politics. This similarly applies to Bangladesh.

As far as the transit deal goes, I think it is feasible in the long term provided that political football in Bangladesh doesn't hinder the benefits. It has pros and cons.

I am not disputing any of the points you are making, neither am I living in total denial that India did not interfere, but it is the hegemony that I have an issue with. It is the fact that they are poking their business and they have an attitude that we owe them. If I had such low standards as them, even I can claim that it is Bangladesh which is why India still sustains. Lets face it, if Bangladesh was still a part of Pakistan, India would be out of existence and given America had always supported Pakistan during that time, I doubt India's capability to fight against the Nixon administration. And I can get into a lot of ifs and buts, but i won't because stooping down to that level is not my thing.
And the fact most of the donations and grants were smuggled out to India was well known. In the book, Blood Legacy, this is mentioned quite a few times. And lets say we believe the Indian version of the story, that they came because they were good citizens and being good neighbour in their blood, Where were they during the famine? Some authors claimed the famine killed more than the war. Even their favourite despot Shake Mujib was pretty much anti india during the end of his regime.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom