How to punish Youtube for blocking Dr. Israr Ahmed's channel

[Mujahid Memon]

As we all know Youtube earns through advertising revenue so we can use an effective adblocker on our browsers and mobile phones to stop their earnings from our country. Here is a list of top ad blockers for 2022

The Best Ad Blockers for 2023

There are big differences among popular ad blockers. We put them to the test to see which one is best for cleaning up your browsing experience.

www.pcmag.com

 

[jamahir]

LOL, this person, Israr Ahmed, beloved of right-wing Pakistanis has no legitimacy. Below is he imposing "Chehre ka parda" ( burqa with veil ) through his talk which many misinformed and misguided listen keenly. If he had lived now he would have been among those condemning Aurat March :

He is an oppressor of the female and a maintainer of social discomfort, maintainer of the artificial, anti-Nature anti-interaction and disconnection between males and females in public. It is automatic that he was a follower of that crook Maududi and it is automatic that he called for resignation of the reasonably progressive Musharraf.

 

[Imran Khan]

stop watching YT

 

[Olympus81]

Stop using Google, watching YT, checking mails on GMail, google maps.

 

[TNT]

LOL, this person, Israr Ahmed, beloved of right-wing Pakistanis has no legitimacy. Below is he imposing "Chehre ka parda" ( burqa with veil ) through his talk which many misinformed and misguided listen keenly. If he had lived now he would have been among those condemning Aurat March :

He is an oppressor of the female and a maintainer of social discomfort, maintainer of the artificial, anti-Nature anti-interaction and disconnection between males and females in public. It is automatic that he was a follower of that crook Maududi and it is automatic that he called for resignation of the reasonably progressive Musharraf.

U have to come and crap in every place. He doesn't have legitimacy? Are u a retard or acting like one? He is considered one of the most learned scholars of Quran in this generation, throughout the world. But again u r the resident retard here after tai hai chen, so anything can ne expected from u.

 

[Maula Jatt]

LOL, this person, Israr Ahmed, beloved of right-wing Pakistanis has no legitimacy. Below is he imposing "Chehre ka parda" ( burqa with veil ) through his talk which many misinformed and misguided listen keenly. If he had lived now he would have been among those condemning Aurat March :

He is an oppressor of the female and a maintainer of social discomfort, maintainer of the artificial, anti-Nature anti-interaction and disconnection between males and females in public. It is automatic that he was a follower of that crook Maududi and it is automatic that he called for resignation of the reasonably progressive Musharraf.

Maududi is the father of modern political Islam within the framework of state in the islamic world

Along with Muslim brotherhood leaders

 

[jamahir]

U have to come and crap in every place. He doesn't have legitimacy? Are u a retard or acting like one? He is considered one of the most learned scholars of Quran in this generation, throughout the world. But again u r the resident retard here after tai hai chen, so anything can ne expected from u.

Israr Ahmed was a regressive idiot which you cannot rationally deny from watching that vid. The below person was a real learned scholar of Islam :

And it isn't Israr fellow that this girl was defending defiantly in 2011, defying the Crusaders called NATO :

Maududi is the father of modern political Islam within the framework of state in the islamic world

Along with Muslim brotherhood leaders

Maududi is not the father of "Political Islam" but among those who perverted it, the "Muslim" Brotherhood being another such. "M"B's Egypt branch, in service of NATO, tried to assassinate Jamal Abdul Nasser and was rightly banned and its leader Syed Qutb executed.

Islam is political since its inception because True Islam is a political, social and socio-economic movement of progressiveness, justice and rationality very unlike what the mullahs and burqas present it to be.

You speak of "Muslim" Brotherhood and again it in service of the NATO Crusaders tried to overthrow the progressive system in Syria in the 1970s and the patriotic Syrian people fought against "M"B's criminality and terrorism and defeated it in a six year war from 1976 to 1982. Please watch the below wonderful and educating speech by then Syrian president Hafiz al Assad, father of the younger Assad who now is fighting again against "M"B and AQ for 11 years :

 

[Maula Jatt]

Israr Ahmed was a regressive idiot which you cannot rationally deny from watching that vid. The below person was a real learned scholar of Islam :

And it isn't Israr fellow that this girl was defending defiantly in 2011, defying the Crusaders called NATO :

Maududi is not the father of "Political Islam" but among those who perverted it, the "Muslim" Brotherhood being another such. "M"B's Egypt branch, in service of NATO, tried to assassinate Jamal Abdul Nasser and was rightly banned and its leader Syed Qutb executed.

Islam is political since its inception because True Islam is a political, social and socio-economic movement of progressiveness, justice and rationality very unlike what the mullahs and burqas present it to be.

You speak of "Muslim" Brotherhood and again it in service of the NATO Crusaders tried to overthrow the progressive system in Syria in the 1970s and the patriotic Syrian people fought against "M"B's criminality and terrorism and defeated it in a six year war from 1976 to 1982. Please watch the below wonderful and educating speech by then Syrian president Hafiz al Assad, father of the younger Assad who now is fighting again against "M"B and AQ for 11 years :

I am not a fan of political Islam was just pointing it out - I wasn't fan boying over the man but yes he was very influential figure in the modern Muslim world

 

[Enigma SIG]

Ahem.

Don't use YouTube?
Don't use google services and apps.
Tonnes of alternatives out there.

 

[IbnAbdullah]

Salaam

LOL, this person, Israr Ahmed, beloved of right-wing Pakistanis has no legitimacy. Below is he imposing "Chehre ka parda" ( burqa with veil ) through his talk which many misinformed and misguided listen keenly. If he had lived now he would have been among those condemning Aurat March :

He is an oppressor of the female and a maintainer of social discomfort, maintainer of the artificial, anti-Nature anti-interaction and disconnection between males and females in public. It is automatic that he was a follower of that crook Maududi and it is automatic that he called for resignation of the reasonably progressive Musharraf.

If you think Dr Israr was incorrect in something he said, then give some counter-evidence/arguments from the revealed sources - Quran or the Sunnah.

Thanks

 

[jamahir]

I am not a fan of political Islam was just pointing it out - I wasn't fan boying over the man but yes he was very influential figure in the modern Muslim world

1. I understood your intention but again let us not call his types as "Political Islamists". His types are those who perverted the progressive and rational teachings of Islam. For example, Islam gives the right to the female to choose who she wants to marry and during the wedding ceremony she can negotiate the socio-economic terms of her marriage and after marriage she has rights including to divorce. But mullahs like Israr Ahmed use their inherent misogynt and anti-humanity and cloak them using the name of Islam to create an oppressive society.

2. It is wrong to say he was influential in modern Muslim world, much less say "very influential". I didn't know of him until I came on PDF. But I knew of real Muslim leaders like Jamal Abdul Nasser and Muammar Gaddafi including, years ago, by being a student colleague of mine at a computer institute who had been named Jamal Abdul Nasser by his parents. A few decades ago many Muslims were sophisticated, educated, learned, intelligent, progressive and rational. Those who respected Israr Ahmed were the psycho / regressive / criminal types who were the gun arms of NATO's regime change operations against progressive Muslim-majority societies, against Muslims who were Socialists and Communists, whether in South Africa or in Syria or indeed in Afghanistan.

Salaam



If you think Dr Israr was incorrect in something he said, then give some counter-evidence/arguments from the revealed sources - Quran or the Sunnah.

Thanks

Come on, do we really need to open our respective Quran translation copies and search for verses where he supposedly found evidence of the Quran imposing the misogynist and anti-human burqa on the female ? Listen to what he says in the vid and then look at what is in the photo of Muammar Gaddafi in post# 7 as also watch the girl in the vid defending him. When I was in school and two years of college no Muslim girl wore burqa but now... bang, many do. What happened ?

Muslims now have become slaves of the mullah who dictates the mind of the Muslim. And the mullah in turn is dictated by the Crusader army called NATO.

 

[fitpOsitive]

As we all know Youtube earns through advertising revenue so we can use an effective adblocker on our browsers and mobile phones to stop their earnings from our country. Here is a list of top ad blockers for 2022

The Best Ad Blockers for 2023

There are big differences among popular ad blockers. We put them to the test to see which one is best for cleaning up your browsing experience.

www.pcmag.com

By uploading it different other similar medias, specially russian and Chinese ones. Antisemitism is anyway increading in asia ans eastern europe.

 

[IbnAbdullah]

Salaam

Come on, do we really need to open our respective Quran translation copies and search for verses where he supposedly found evidence of the Quran imposing the misogynist and anti-human burqa on the female ? Listen to what he says in the vid and then look at what is in the photo of Muammar Gaddafi in post# 7 as also watch the girl in the vid defending him. When I was in school and two years of college no Muslim girl wore burqa but now... bang, many do. What happened ?

Muslims now have become slaves of the mullah who dictates the mind of the Muslim. And the mullah in turn is dictated by the Crusader army called NATO.

I had a similar issue with 'mullahs' being incharge of Islam. I remember I went to the local mosque and asked the imam about major sins. He started off with watching T.V. Not watching dodgy stuff on t.v but just t.v itself.

Eventually I started to do my research. I remember I was talking to someone from the UK was a convert and had spent a few years studying Islam properly. Very learned sort of person. I said something along the lines of 'I think Islam says' and he stopped me. He stopped me and said that Islam is not what you or I think, rather what was revealed. You have to qualify your assertions about Islam with proofs and evidence from Quran and Sunnah. It's because Islam was revealed upon Mohammed pbuh from Allah via Gabriel a s. Not anyone else.

Ultimately, it's about what will be accepted by Allah on the Day of Judgment. It cannot be known except through that which Allah has revealed through His Messengers. Pbut.

Ever since then I try to remind myself of that. That's why I always ask for evidence from Quran and Sunnah because no great scholar or wali's opinion is Islamically indisputable. Only Quran and the Sunnah of RasulAllah pbuh are considered 'daleel' (evidence) in of themselves. Everything else has to be justified through the basic two sources.

That's why I ask for evidence. Not because I want to be difficult or argumentative but because it is the only approach that can avoid needless conflict because you need to justify your stance using commonly accepted base. Otherwise everything will be he said she said or my opinion or their opinion which cannot bring about any resolution.

 

[jamahir]

Salaam




I had a similar issue with 'mullahs' being incharge of Islam. I remember I went to the local mosque and asked the imam about major sins. He started off with watching T.V. Not watching dodgy stuff on t.v but just t.v itself.

Eventually I started to do my research. I remember I was talking to someone from the UK was a convert and had spent a few years studying Islam properly. Very learned sort of person. I said something along the lines of 'I think Islam says' and he stopped me. He stopped me and said that Islam is not what you or I think, rather what was revealed. You have to qualify your assertions about Islam with proofs and evidence from Quran and Sunnah. It's because Islam was revealed upon Mohammed pbuh from Allah via Gabriel a s. Not anyone else.

Ultimately, it's about what will be accepted by Allah on the Day of Judgment. It cannot be known except through that which Allah has revealed through His Messengers. Pbut.

Ever since then I try to remind myself of that. That's why I always ask for evidence from Quran and Sunnah because no great scholar or wali's opinion is Islamically indisputable. Only Quran and the Sunnah of RasulAllah pbuh are considered 'daleel' (evidence) in of themselves. Everything else has to be justified through the basic two sources.

That's why I ask for evidence. Not because I want to be difficult or argumentative but because it is the only approach that can avoid needless conflict because you need to justify your stance using commonly accepted base. Otherwise everything will be he said she said or my opinion or their opinion which cannot bring about any resolution.

If I have to justify my stance using "commonly accepted base" in South Asia especially the typical modern Muslim in India and Pakistan I will have to accept and justify irrationality and stupidity of the utter sort. Many modern Indian Muslims to justify their own irrationality and misogyny use the cloth of Islam to cover themselves with fake piousness and then will order others no as brainwashed as them and say that "Oh wear the burqa else you will suffer in the hereafter" or "Oh pray ten times a day or your will suffer in the hereafter". Those who consider themselves to be pious are the first ones to be supremely morally corrupted and become tools of the Crusaders. This is what in essense Hafiz al Assad said in that speech I posted previously.

You ask me for evidence and I ask for you evidence for the burqa in the Quran because that is the point of contention. The burqa, as has been posted by me and others here, is a pre-Islam Jewish garment nothing to do with Islam. In fact Islamically the burqa is anti-Islamic because it seeks to hide away the female from society, to deny her of her female existence when in fact Islam was the religion that brought social and socio-economic rights to the female when other religions oppressed the female and still do. Tell me, how is it that Israr Ahmed championed the burqa including the veil / naqab when the Quran states this ?

The Quran (2:221)[15] also states,

"And do not marry Polytheist women until they believe, And a believing slave woman is better than a Polytheist women, even though she might please you. And do not marry Polytheist men until they believe. And a believing slave is better than a Polytheist men, even though he might please you. Those invite [you] to the Fire, but Allah invites to Paradise and to forgiveness, by His permission. And He makes clear His verses to the people that perhaps they may remember".

So, logically, according to the Quran in one circumstance the Muslim male has to be able to see the female's face to approach her for marraige. Now how is this possible if the the female is naqab'ed ? Does that particular male get gifted x-ray vision in that particular moment to see through the naqab of that female ? So what is Israr Ahmed talking about when he champions the burqa and the naqab ?

And what is this "Sunnah" ? Essentially stories gathered a hundred or more years after the death of Hazrat Muhammad, some acceptable / reasonable / understandable and some irrational. The modern India-origin ritualist called Tableegh Jamaati imposes the non-Islamic burqa on the Muslim female ( and seeks to impose on the non-Muslim in many places in the West ) whereas as above just by one verse the burqa is absent in the Quran while the TJs claim to follow. At the same time the TJs in a neighborhood in India hurry to the mosque for their unmissable afternoon prayer and while passing they see a cat screaming because he or she is being attacked by five dogs and the TJs don't stop to chase away the dogs and help the cat because they don't want to miss their prayer and this despite that they claim to follow "Sunnah" and one story in the "Sunnah" is of Hazrat Muhammad having a cat called Muezza and being much adoring of it and one of his comrades being nicknamed Abu Hurairah ( literally meaning "Father of the cats / kittens" ). Now, would these two people have wanted their beloved cats to be torn apart by the dogs in their neighborhood or city ? So what are the Tableegh Jamaatis believing so passionately in ? They are confused people - some just misinformed and misguided but most of them harmful to society, Muslim society in particular and humanity in general. It is no surprise that the Tableegh Jamaatis are used by the NATO Crusaders in NATO's regime change plots, whether in Afghanistan in the 1980s or in Syria or some months ago in Kazakhstan.

 

[Mujahid Memon]

stop watching YT