If I have to justify my stance using "commonly accepted base" in South Asia especially the typical modern Muslim in India and Pakistan I will have to accept and justify irrationality and stupidity of the utter sort. Many modern Indian Muslims to justify their own irrationality and misogyny use the cloth of Islam to cover themselves with fake piousness and then will order others no as brainwashed as them and say that "Oh wear the burqa else you will suffer in the hereafter" or "Oh pray ten times a day or your will suffer in the hereafter". Those who consider themselves to be pious are the first ones to be supremely morally corrupted and become tools of the Crusaders. This is what in essense Hafiz al Assad said in that speech I posted previously.
You ask me for evidence and I ask for you evidence for the burqa in the Quran because that is the point of contention. The burqa, as has been posted by me and others here, is a pre-Islam Jewish garment nothing to do with Islam. In fact Islamically the burqa is anti-Islamic because it seeks to hide away the female from society, to deny her of her female existence when in fact Islam was the religion that brought social and socio-economic rights to the female when other religions oppressed the female and still do. Tell me, how is it that Israr Ahmed championed the burqa including the veil / naqab when the Quran states
this ?
So, logically, according to the Quran in one circumstance the Muslim male has to be able to see the female's face to approach her for marraige. Now how is this possible if the the female is naqab'ed ? Does that particular male get gifted x-ray vision in that particular moment to see through the naqab of that female ? So what is Israr Ahmed talking about when he champions the burqa and the naqab ?
And what is this "Sunnah" ? Essentially stories gathered a hundred or more years after the death of Hazrat Muhammad, some acceptable / reasonable / understandable and some irrational. The modern India-origin ritualist called Tableegh Jamaati imposes the non-Islamic burqa on the Muslim female ( and seeks to impose on the non-Muslim in many places in the West ) whereas as above just by one verse the burqa is absent in the Quran while the TJs claim to follow. At the same time the TJs in a neighborhood in India hurry to the mosque for
their unmissable afternoon prayer and while passing they see a cat screaming because he or she is being attacked by five dogs and the TJs don't stop to chase away the dogs and help the cat because they don't want to miss their prayer and this despite that they claim to follow "Sunnah" and one story in the "Sunnah" is of Hazrat Muhammad having a cat called Muezza and being much adoring of it and one of his comrades being nicknamed Abu Hurairah ( literally meaning "Father of the cats / kittens" ). Now, would these two people have wanted their beloved cats to be torn apart by the dogs in their neighborhood or city ? So what are the Tableegh Jamaatis believing so passionately in ? They are confused people - some just misinformed and misguided but most of them harmful to society, Muslim society in particular and humanity in general. It is no surprise that the Tableegh Jamaatis are used by the NATO Crusaders in NATO's regime change plots, whether in Afghanistan in the 1980s or in Syria or some months ago in Kazakhstan.
