Never said it was out of 'good heart'. But of course, since you failed to debate on points relevant to the argument, as outlined in my post 78, you have no choice but to resort to hyperboles.
The Greatest Threat: Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Crisis of Global Security: Richard Butler: 9781586480394: Amazon.com: Books
Remember, Richard Butler was the team leader for UNSCOM.
Amazon.com: The Bomb in My Garden: The Secrets of Saddam's Nuclear Mastermind (9780471741275): Mahdi Obeidi: Books
Mahdi Obeidi was Saddam Hussein's chief nuclear scientist.
I have both books on my shelf.
Butler's opinion was that the ME have no business in being nuclear weapons states. The peoples' leaderships were and still are immature, uncaring about the potential horror they seek to possess.
Obeidi's opinion, which was essentially one of the 'insider' status, was the same. The word 'bomb' in his memoir did not refer to an actual nuclear weapon, or radiological device, or even a prototype of either type. What Saddam Hussein ordered Obeidi to bury in Obeidi's home garden were components for nuclear centrifuges.
http://fas.org/programs/ssp/nukes/fuelcycle/centrifuges/centrifuge.html
In the epilogue, Obeidi flat out stated that it was good that the US removed Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq.
You have two men who are far more experienced in the field of nuclear science than you will ever learn, kid, and they came at the issue from different directions and privy to information that you will never know. Butler did not ask for a military style removal of the likes of Saddam Hussein, but he pretty much implied it by saying the ME have no business possessing nuclear weapons. Obeidi did not implied, he approved.
Finally, if you think that the initials 'WMD' means only functional nuclear weapons, then you should STFU about this subject. The UN website is available for you public consumption but I guess you are too stupid and lazy to make use of it. The initials 'WMD' contains not just functional nuclear weapons, but prototypes, people, programs, and materials. To date, the best way to verify that an indigenous nuclear weapons program is a success is to actually detonate a nuclear explosive device
BEFORE turning it into a packaged and mobile weapon. That is what India and Pakistan did -- clandestinely. Iraq never detonated anything nuclear. So if the initials 'WMD' means only functional nuclear weapons, then the entire inspection regime was immoral from the start.
Are you learning anything ?
Best way for dictatorships to remain dictatorships is to remain inside their borders. Then you would not have to deal with democracy.