Silverblaze
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2012
- Messages
- 2,737
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Merely standing against any person ( albeit famous ) does not make him bad. His performance is the yardstick I use.
And do you support nepotism? Why and how was Jinnah's family qualified? Surely that is the antithesis of any claim to democracy? By qualifying a candidate because of their relationship to deceased figure is a form of furthering autocracy.
Is that not another form of "Bhuttoism" where one family ends up with franchise?
Ps. I would like to think of Ayub as having "stood for Pakistan" then any particular group.
How was Ayub qualified to run the largest muslim nation in the world? May be the Jinnah family would have run things even better, we never know.
As far as this nepotism is concerned, Ayub son and his grandson both ended up in politics which does seem to be a glaring example of an absolute dynasty.
Can't speculate much, but Ayub should be judged in all aspects, which include strengthening feudals like bhutto and nawab of kalabagh, the mercantile class and his foreign policies.
However, he fares well compared to the CIA favorite Gen Zia and ever so brave Musharraf.