How Goa became a part of India

[Chinese-Dragon]

Wrong. When British left there were about 250 independent kingdoms which were unified later by Sardar Patel.

It's never late to learn something new.

Anyway I thought you were off this thread.

Please don't tell me that it was the Indians, who created the entity known as "British India".

Before British India, there was no such thing as "Indians" anyway... it was things like Punjabis and Tamils.

It was the British who united the subcontinent under one rule. Those princely states at the end of the day were tools of the British Raj.

 

[KS]

Please don't tell me that it was the Indians, who created the entity known as "British India".

Before British India, there was no such thing as "Indians" anyway... it was things like Punjabis and Tamils.

It was the British who united the subcontinent under one rule. Those princely states at the end of the day were ruled by the British Raj.

Sigh.

You can take a horse to pond, but cant make it to drink water.

Perhaps that proverb might have come for people like you.

I've said what I had to say in simple English, as simple as an average chine could understand..but still..

 

[Gautam]

Please don't tell me that it was the Indians, who created the entity known as "British India".

Before British India, there was no such thing as "Indians" anyway... it was things like Punjabis and Tamils.

It was the British who united the subcontinent under one rule. Those princely states at the end of the day were tools of the British Raj.

sub continent under one rule by British for the first time? hmmm....

ever heard of Mourya Empire?

 

[Rocky25]

Please don't tell me that it was the Indians, who created the entity known as "British India".

Before British India, there was no such thing as "Indians" anyway... it was things like Punjabis and Tamils.

It was the British who united the subcontinent under one rule. Those princely states at the end of the day were tools of the British Raj.

Even before British the Mughals ruled aleast 95% of today's India... Does that men it is Mughal India? India is sometimes called as Bharath because a King nick named Bharath India? Majority of India are Hindus.... So that means is it Hindu India?

Have you ever heard of Cholas, Cheras, Pandya, Magadha, Gupta, Mauryan empire!

 

[Rocky25]

double post

 

[Gautam]

Even before British the Mughals ruled aleast 95% of today's India... Does that men it is Mughal India? India is sometimes called as Bharath because a King nick named Bharath India? Majority of India are Hindus.... So that means is it Hindu India?

Have you ever heard of Cholas, Cheras, Pandya, Magadha, Gupta, Mauryan empire!

nope. he just heard of British as he is from Hong Kong which was under British rule till 1997!

 

[Rocky25]

Double Post.

 

[RoYaL~GuJJaR]

@Indian...

Why you wasting your time in trying to convince a Troll about what India aka Bharat aka Hindustan is?

If some stupid people think History about a country can be learned on Defence forums then hail there High IQ

Let them live in delusion!

 

[Varunastra]

@Indian...

Why you wasting your time in trying to convince a Troll about what India aka Bharat aka Hindustan is?

If some stupid people think History about a country can be learned on Defence forums then hail there High IQ

Let them live in delusion!

you are right dude!!!!!!!!.........these chinese are foolish trolls...........better give no importance to them!!!!!

 

[Rig Vedic]

NEVER AGAIN

If you are serious about NEVER AGAIN, you have to get rid of EVMs. Times have changed, and so has the modus operandi of colonization.

 

[bharathrone]

The name India was given by Greece and not british,

Your own country china is nothing before mongols invaded and there decedents named it china. There is no such thing as china either, bunch of tribes


There was always nation called bharat , whatever you say is pure non sense.

 

[sss112]

What i do not understand about the trolls from our northern neighbor saying
How can Indians be proud of India as it was created by the British
and in a couple of sentences praise pakistan.
To all those to say this If pakistanis are proud of an entity coming into existence in 1947, we are proud of our country as it existed since centuries

They do not try to understand that the small states came into existence when large empires were divided amongst families. These Princes we either related or living in harmony for major part of our history till the invaders came in.
the unification of the country into empire and subsequent division into small states has happened quite a few times. You would know this if you bother to go through the History of India.

 

[ptltejas]

It was a bold operation by Nehru. The colonialists arse had to be kicked out.

No, It was not bold operation by nehru but by the Indian Militery. (Indian Army, Navy and Airforce). as Nehru did nothing. few leaders started Satyagrah way and they were arrested. the navy of portuguise fired on indian fishermen boats due to which some damage were got. media raise quesions to Nehru who did nothing, as he had no other way he permit to attack. he did not make any good efforts. he was always peace lover. Indira Gandhi had always taken very active role in WAR-71, whereas Nehru did nothing. due to presure of media he took the steps to just order to get area back.

 

[I spikes therefore I am]

India struggled and won in Hydrabad ,Kashmir ,some states in NE, Goa and made them as part of our democratic India even we got Andaman nicobar islands which is too far frm Indian subcontinent. I have one question why India ignored Srilanka? which is only 28 km frm Rameswaram , I think in 1950's SL doesn't have the capability to stand against India so that time we easily take over the Island without resistance and thereby we established our dominance over Indian ocean . Why it not happened anybody can explain?

 

[pakau]

we were aggressive. but we had no other choice.

IT WAS JUST A FORMALITY. FOR ALL PRACTICALLY THE PORTUGUESE HAD ALREADY LOST GOA.