How Bangladeshis view Pakistanis today?

[PoKeMon]

no i am telling you his place of origin, thats all.......................

Even then you are wrong. He was born in Patna, India.

Just accept you went wrong and move on.

 

[Jf Thunder]

Even then you are wrong. He was born in Patna, India.

Just accept you went wrong and move on.

whut?
then how did he become a Bangladeshi?
what was i trying to prove to here btw?

 

[PoKeMon]

whut?
then how did he become a Bangladeshi?
what was i trying to prove to here btw?

He practiced as a lawyer in Calcutta and then chose to go to East pakistan when it was created.

You were trying to prove him as a BDeshi somehow.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Yes I know truth hurts...................move on with your miserable lives.

Ummm, BD has better HDI in some sectors than India, let alone Pakistan. There is little of the 'spirit of 71' there today. They have moved way ahead of the past.

 

[Ahmad Sajjad Paracha]

End of yopic over here. I think we should proceed ahead. Unfair treatment was done by west to east pakistan and then Indian aggravated that and maligned west Pakistan to devastating limit summary of 1947-1971. Instead of discussing and fighting on past. We should think for future.

 

[Jf Thunder]

He practiced as a lawyer in Calcutta and then chose to go to East pakistan when it was created.

You were trying to prove him as a BDeshi somehow.

i just proved it.................

 

[PoKeMon]

i just proved it.................

Oh man....

He moved to East Pakistan and not Bangladesh.

He was never a BDeshi national.

 

[Jf Thunder]

Oh man....

He moved to East Pakistan and not Bangladesh.

He was never a BDeshi national.

yes i am trying to say he was an East Pakistani, who got a nigh position even after breakup of Pakistan

 

[PoKeMon]

yes i am trying to say he was an East Pakistani, who got a nigh position even after breakup of Pakistan

So does that qualify him as someone not to believe?

 

[Jf Thunder]

So does that qualify him as someone not to believe?

no, it is said to challenge that we didnt trust East Pakistanis

 

[PoKeMon]

no, it is said to challenge that we didnt trust East Pakistanis

His report suggest otherwise.

Even sane and rational pakistani acknowledge the then mistakes made by pak regime.

 

[damiendehorn]

Now mr @damiendehorn you are damn wrong.....

Instead of a sweeping statement, show me what Bangladeshis have in common with indians or STFU.

 

[Jf Thunder]

His report suggest otherwise.

Even sane and rational pakistani acknowledge the then mistakes made by pak regime.

i acknowledge the mistakes done by us, we should have given them their rightful power, but i fail to acknowledge the propaganda made against our Army

So does that qualify him as someone not to believe?

no that qualifies him to be biased towards East Pakistan, but he gave a very balanced report which was unfortunately altered

 

[PoKeMon]

i acknowledge the mistakes done by us, we should have given them their rightful power, but i fail to acknowledge the propaganda made against our Army


no that qualifies him to be biased towards East Pakistan, but he gave a very balanced report which was unfortunately altered

I believe your argument is misplaced -

1- If he was biased toward BDesh, he would have never chosen Pakistan at his country, knowing the fact how much hostile common pakistanis would be against east pakistanis after 71 fiasco.

2- Even if he was biased, he would have never chose to come up with a report as aggressive against army as it was, knowing that his loyalties would be questioned.

3- He would never be trusted as Chief Justice if there was an iota of doubt over his credential and loyalty toward Pakistan. It would be much easier to sack him once Bengalis revolted and no one would have questioned.

The fact is - he was loyal toward pakistan and his allegiance was totally toward pakistan. Thats why despite of all odds and danger, he spoke the harsh truth.

His son has been CJ of IHC, not sure if he is now.

 

[bongbang]

West Pakistanis were minority, but they were educated and wealthy. Thats why they had high positions in all sectors. 71 our literacy was around 15% and no business magnets who could run the country. But today we have many rich people and literacy rate has also increased. We did a good thing by breaking away.

Lets see,
Non Hindu- PM, Check
Non Hindu- President, Check
Non Hindu - Army Chief, Check
Non Hindu - IAF Chief, Check
Non Hindu - Navy Chief, Check
Non Hindu - Attorney Gen, Check
Non Hindu- Solicitor General, Check
Non Hindu - Chief Justice, Check

Indian Bengali Hindu, You are talking to one, and owes all of his success to Indian education system and it's democracy. As far as Bengali Hindus are concerned, they have had stellar contribution to not just Indian society but also the defniation of Republic of India. With 5 Bharat Ratnas, to board members, chairman and MD's of most of the top private and Public sector organisations, pillars of art, literature, music, film, political activism, science, mathematics, military and space) Bengali contribution to Indian society and India's contribution towards empowerment of Indian Bengalis has been of perfect osmosis. So your idea of Indian Bengali doesn't even scratch the surface of nationalistic aspiration for an Indian Bengali.

Bangladesh/EP was created for Muslims only but your country was created for all religions so you must have high rank people from minorities. Your non Hindu means many things but where is the majority minority Muslims. Our non Muslims mean Hindu, Cht hill people and some buddhist, Christians. We have still some negotiations going on with the hill people. Though Hindus arent in top positions but 10 out of 1 they can be seen among 3 in 1 important positions in every important sectors. BD is improving from dirt poor. And our friendly Muslim countries helped us a lot. But what did you do for our Hindus as large Hindu country in the world. Other than taking our talented people did you try to invest in BD or given them job opportunities so that they can live well in BD not migrate to India.