What's new

HIT new project of Armored Fighting Vehicle

As you say :-)
nope it not that I know anything about this new project but its obvious to expect an AFV with anti-tank capability ...... otherwise it will be just a fancy troop carrier
 
nope it not that I know anything about this new project but its obvious to expect an AFV with anti-tank capability ...... otherwise it will be just a fancy troop carrier
Not sure what it really is but caliber above 30 mm could mean IFV in conjunction with other specs. The MBT side seems covered with AK and VT-4 whereas M-113 and Talha are standard APCs and TDs.

?

We need lynx type ifv or some wheeled based ifv
I would have liked a MRAP as standard troop carrier

Failure is an important teacher. After every failure, we will see improvements.
I think HIT produces as per PA requirements, still to see if an IFV fits the doctrine. Large caliber has large recoil so bigger turret which would mean an accordingly bigger hull, increase weight
 
Not sure what it really is but caliber above 30 mm could mean IFV in conjunction with other specs. The MBT side seems covered with AK and VT-4 whereas M-113 and Talha are standard APCs and TDs.


?


I would have liked a MRAP as standard troop carrier


I think HIT produces as per PA requirements, still to see if an IFV fits the doctrine. Large caliber has large recoil so bigger turret which would mean an accordingly bigger hull, increase weight
aap ki mrap wali huwahish bhi shayad poori ho jayey , a improved variant of Hamza 6x6 MRAP with modifications suited to PA? requirements was being trialed it seems.
see vids below



1658852840486.png


@PanzerKiel aap hi kuch bata do , aaj kal bahot hamosh rehney lagey ho
 
I think HIT produces as per PA requirements, still to see if an IFV fits the doctrine. Large caliber has large recoil so bigger turret which would mean an accordingly bigger hull, increase weight
PA has been looking for an IFV for a pretty long time now PA trialed FMC AIFV based on the M113 Chassis in the 90s and according to a western author it was going to be locally produced similar to how the turks and the dutch produced but that didnt happen for unknown reasons. i think PA has always been interested in IFVs but procurement costs may become a problem thats why there hasnt been much progress in regards to IFV procurement or development.
AIFV.jpg
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom