HIT new project of Armored Fighting Vehicle

[Zarvan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1551597337411289089

@PanzerKiel @farooqbhai007

 

[Signalian]

Heavier than 30 mm ? but no ATGM capability

 

[Super Falcon]

We need lynx type ifv or some wheeled based ifv

 

[HRK]

Heavier than 30 mm ? but no ATGM capability

IF its AFV then it would t have anti tank capability ....

 

[Dazzler]

Yet another HIT project that'll later be abandoned. The list of failures is growing.

 

[Signalian]

IF its AFV then it would t have anti tank capability ....

As you say

 

[HRK]

As you say

nope it not that I know anything about this new project but its obvious to expect an AFV with anti-tank capability ...... otherwise it will be just a fancy troop carrier

 

[RAMPAGE]

Yet another HIT project that'll later be abandoned. The list of failures is growing.

@Signalian

 

[Darth Vader]

Yet another HIT project that'll later be abandoned. The list of failures is growing.

Well these projects are meant fot that.
Just like that 12 million songmoney will be paid before hand and go into everyones pocket

 

[S.Y.A]

Yet another HIT project that'll later be abandoned. The list of failures is growing.

...or the HIT will get much needed experience and lessons in project + product management.

 

[_NOBODY_]

Yet another HIT project that'll later be abandoned. The list of failures is growing.

Failure is an important teacher. After every failure, we will see improvements.

 

[Signalian]

nope it not that I know anything about this new project but its obvious to expect an AFV with anti-tank capability ...... otherwise it will be just a fancy troop carrier

Not sure what it really is but caliber above 30 mm could mean IFV in conjunction with other specs. The MBT side seems covered with AK and VT-4 whereas M-113 and Talha are standard APCs and TDs.

@Signalian

?

We need lynx type ifv or some wheeled based ifv

I would have liked a MRAP as standard troop carrier

Failure is an important teacher. After every failure, we will see improvements.

I think HIT produces as per PA requirements, still to see if an IFV fits the doctrine. Large caliber has large recoil so bigger turret which would mean an accordingly bigger hull, increase weight

 

[farooqbhai007]

Not sure what it really is but caliber above 30 mm could mean IFV in conjunction with other specs. The MBT side seems covered with AK and VT-4 whereas M-113 and Talha are standard APCs and TDs.


?


I would have liked a MRAP as standard troop carrier


I think HIT produces as per PA requirements, still to see if an IFV fits the doctrine. Large caliber has large recoil so bigger turret which would mean an accordingly bigger hull, increase weight

aap ki mrap wali huwahish bhi shayad poori ho jayey , a improved variant of Hamza 6x6 MRAP with modifications suited to PA? requirements was being trialed it seems.
see vids below

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7124206455976201499

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7113618630369168667

@PanzerKiel aap hi kuch bata do , aaj kal bahot hamosh rehney lagey ho

 

[Phantom.]

I think HIT produces as per PA requirements, still to see if an IFV fits the doctrine. Large caliber has large recoil so bigger turret which would mean an accordingly bigger hull, increase weight

PA has been looking for an IFV for a pretty long time now PA trialed FMC AIFV based on the M113 Chassis in the 90s and according to a western author it was going to be locally produced similar to how the turks and the dutch produced but that didnt happen for unknown reasons. i think PA has always been interested in IFVs but procurement costs may become a problem thats why there hasnt been much progress in regards to IFV procurement or development.

 

[monitor]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1551597337411289089

@PanzerKiel @farooqbhai007

What is the latest status of viper ? Is that completed or abandon?