Hindus were never converted to Islam at the point of sword says Azam Khan

[Bornubus]

Shut up Ajraf/Ajlaf

 

[vegav]

Muslims in South Asia today are getting close to the number of Hindus in the region. Hinduism as a way of life failed its people by locking them into a perpetual state of permanent caste slavery, myths and inequality. All you have to do is to look at the Indian Hindu population to see the non social mobility still in action. Islam replaced Hinduism and Budhism because it distributed equality, eradicated the caste system and provided a balanced socioeconomic model where people stopped looking at each other from a racial point of view.

The notion of 'under sword' conversion is very popular among the Hindutva brand of today. They can't be blamed because this nonesense narrative which is refuted by all historians is the only way the Hindutvadasis can not only simplify the answer to this question but also provide a self serving myth to heal their historic insecurities, hide Hinduism's failure as a system and consolidate whatever is left of it. Anyone in their position would've done the same through an 'easy' approach.

Contarary to their belief, Islam took a good 500 years to consolidate in South Asia and if we really practiced 'convert or die' strategy as today's Hindutvadasis propogate, there wouldn't have been any Hindus left today. Muslims had a 1000 years to eradicate them like the Brits eradicated Ameroindians and Australian Aboriginals. The very fact that Hindus still are a demographic majority (though not for long) negates their bogus narrative.

if u tried that,hindus would have been united and there would have been no mughal empire.

Since you don't know about Islamic Tax called Zakat. Let me assure you Jizya is far less than what Muslims have to pay for/in Zakat. Which is 2.5 percent upon all of their wealth each year !

bacha bacha bhi jaanta hain ki yeh jhoot hain.

 

[Rana Thakur]

Muslims in South Asia today are getting close to the number of Hindus in the region. Hinduism as a way of life failed its people by locking them into a perpetual state of permanent caste slavery, myths and inequality. All you have to do is to look at the Indian Hindu population to see the non social mobility still in action. Islam replaced Hinduism and Budhism because it distributed equality, eradicated the caste system and provided a balanced socioeconomic model where people stopped looking at each other from a racial point of view.

The notion of 'under sword' conversion is very popular among the Hindutva brand of today. They can't be blamed because this nonesense narrative which is refuted by all historians is the only way the Hindutvadasis can not only simplify the answer to this question but also provide a self serving myth to heal their historic insecurities, hide Hinduism's failure as a system and consolidate whatever is left of it. Anyone in their position would've done the same through an 'easy' approach.

Contarary to their belief, Islam took a good 500 years to consolidate in South Asia and if we really practiced 'convert or die' strategy as today's Hindutvadasis propogate, there wouldn't have been any Hindus left today. Muslims had a 1000 years to eradicate them like the Brits eradicated Ameroindians and Australian Aboriginals. The very fact that Hindus still are a demographic majority (though not for long) negates their bogus narrative.

Kis kis ko aajkal Admin bana dete hai.

Looking at this guy's hatred, He seems one of those ISIS waala mulla type.

 

[Kompromat]

Kis kis ko aajkal Admin bana dete hai.

Looking at this guy's hatred, He seems one of those ISIS waala mulla type.

You can't be blamed for rejecting my views. Truth is always hard to digest.

 

[Arya Desa]

Shiva is a prophet in Islam, so you can say Hindus are automatic musalman.

 

[Echo_419]

Muslims in South Asia today are getting close to the number of Hindus in the region. Hinduism as a way of life failed its people by locking them into a perpetual state of permanent caste slavery, myths and inequality. All you have to do is to look at the Indian Hindu population to see the non social mobility still in action. Islam replaced Hinduism and Budhism because it distributed equality, eradicated the caste system and provided a balanced socioeconomic model where people stopped looking at each other from a racial point of view.

The notion of 'under sword' conversion is very popular among the Hindutva brand of today. They can't be blamed because this nonesense narrative which is refuted by all historians is the only way the Hindutvadasis can not only simplify the answer to this question but also provide a self serving myth to heal their historic insecurities, hide Hinduism's failure as a system and consolidate whatever is left of it. Anyone in their position would've done the same through an 'easy' approach.

Contarary to their belief, Islam took a good 500 years to consolidate in South Asia and if we really practiced 'convert or die' strategy as today's Hindutvadasis propogate, there wouldn't have been any Hindus left today. Muslims had a 1000 years to eradicate them like the Brits eradicated Ameroindians and Australian Aboriginals. The very fact that Hindus still are a demographic majority (though not for long) negates their bogus narrative.

BS you tried so hard to Wipe us out but as usual failed everytime

 

[lasttry]

He also hit out at the BJP on the issue of "Love Jihad". "They do not know the definition of love. In the name of 'Love Jihad', they are trying to bring bad name to the pious relationship between a man and a woman," Khan said.

Oooohhhh! How touching!!

Then why the fcuk is it necessary for the hindu girl or guy that marries a muslim guy or girl to convert to Islam. Pious relationship my foot.

Azam Khan has a habit of talking out of his ***

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Jizya - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mughals enforced Jizya on Hindus. THose who coudnt afford converted. That is force

Meanwhile muslims had to pay Zakat and other taxes..

 

[Kompromat]

Meanwhile muslims had to pay Zakat and other taxes..

Muslims paid taxes to Baitul Maal. The Jizya is the 'only' tax non Muslims were liable to pay and it was lower than tax rate for Muslims. Muslums are also liable to pay 2.5% of their total wealth to the needy, every year. Most of our Hindu friends have zilch idea about how the Baitul Maal works.

 

[Fireurimagination]

Muslims in South Asia today are getting close to the number of Hindus in the region. Hinduism as a way of life failed its people by locking them into a perpetual state of permanent caste slavery, myths and inequality. All you have to do is to look at the Indian Hindu population to see the non social mobility still in action. Islam replaced Hinduism and Budhism because it distributed equality, eradicated the caste system and provided a balanced socioeconomic model where people stopped looking at each other from a racial point of view.

The notion of 'under sword' conversion is very popular among the Hindutva brand of today. They can't be blamed because this nonesense narrative which is refuted by all historians is the only way the Hindutvadasis can not only simplify the answer to this question but also provide a self serving myth to heal their historic insecurities, hide Hinduism's failure as a system and consolidate whatever is left of it. Anyone in their position would've done the same through an 'easy' approach.

Contarary to their belief, Islam took a good 500 years to consolidate in South Asia and if we really practiced 'convert or die' strategy as today's Hindutvadasis propogate, there wouldn't have been any Hindus left today. Muslims had a 1000 years to eradicate them like the Brits eradicated Ameroindians and Australian Aboriginals. The very fact that Hindus still are a demographic majority (though not for long) negates their bogus narrative.

Hinduism never spread far and wide because converting others to your fold was never Hinduism's motive, remember Hinduism came first. FYI Buddhism did spread far and wide. Hinduism is still the oldest and third largest followed religion. If you believe that people in sub-continent and elsewhere converted because of the peaceful message of love the mughals and afghan raiders bought to the sub-continent then what can I say, hats-off to your common-sense

 

[Barakah]

Lmao look at all these butthurt Hindus

 

[MokshaVimukthi]

It's true Islam didn't physically force people to convert. But when Muslims conquered a country they made themselves a privileged class and everybody else had dhimmi status. So there was a strong motivation for dhimmis to convert. That's what "spread by the sword" refers to.

LOL..Seriously ?

Hinduism never spread far and wide because converting others to your fold was never Hinduism's motive, remember Hinduism came first. FYI Buddhism did spread far and wide. Hinduism is still the oldest and third largest followed religion. If you believe that people in sub-continent and elsewhere converted because of the peaceful message of love the mughals and afghan raiders bought to the sub-continent then what can I say, hats-off to your common-sense

Errr ... Hinduism spread from Afghanistan to Vietnam to China. What on earth are you talking about ?

 

[third eye]

Islam replaced Hinduism and Budhism because it distributed equality, eradicated the caste system and provided a balanced socioeconomic model where people stopped looking at each other from a racial point of view.

Indeed

.. and what do you attribute the perpetual feud / killing among Shia - Sunni and the plight of Bohra, Ahmediaya etc etc. Not exactly a Garden of Eden , isnt it ?

All religions have internal dynamics ( Catholics - Protestants) so lets not pontificate and take a ' holier than thou' stance.

@ Subject. This clot Azam Khan was the same dolt who stated publically during the elections that no hindu troops participated in the Kargil Ops - only Muslims troops of the IA did.

This alone should disqualify him from among sane humans & his utterance be treated as tripe.

 

[HariPrasad]

LUCKNOW: Senior UP cabinet minister Azam Khan has posed a question to RSS as to why it compromised with Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed on the issue of Article 370 that grants special status to the state.

Khan said that the outfit had kept the issue alive since independence. Azam Khan also lashed out at leaders of saffron outfits for vitiating peaceful atmosphere by raising the issue of conversion.

"Hindus were never converted to Islam at the point of sword. It is insult of Hindus," he said. He also hit out at the BJP on the issue of "Love Jihad". "They do not know the definition of love. In the name of 'Love Jihad', they are trying to bring bad name to the pious relationship between a man and a woman," Khan said.

He also took a dig at BJP leader Sadhvi Prachi who has appeal to youth not to idolise the Bollywood's Khan trio -- Shah Rukh Khan, Aamir Khan and Salman Khan. Referring to himself, Azam said said that there was another Khan in the list.

"They (saffron outfit leaders) have been criticising Khans. But now they have added one more Khan, Azam Khan, for various reasons," he said.

Guru Tegbahadur was teared. Gurus sons were constructed in wall alive for not converting to Islam. To whom this idiot is teaching wrong history?

 

[itachiii]

Hinduism never spread far and wide because converting others to your fold was never Hinduism's motive, remember Hinduism came first. FYI Buddhism did spread far and wide. Hinduism is still the oldest and third largest followed religion. If you believe that people in sub-continent and elsewhere converted because of the peaceful message of love the mughals and afghan raiders bought to the sub-continent then what can I say, hats-off to your common-sense

bro, Hinduism extended from afghanistan in the north to Indonesia,cambodia, thailand in the south over the tym people in these countries got converted to budhism in later part sme of them got converted to islam..