1. Well...there are millions of illegal Bangladeshis in India, especially in the state of Assam where now constitute a whopping 40%+ overall...and 70-90% in bordering districts.
Nonsense. Why would Bangladeshis from wealthier Bangladesh migrate to dirty, poor Assam, that too illegally?
Absolute, unadulterated Indian tripe.
2.Have you ever asked the same question when people protests against killings in Palestine or Burma?? Why should India conspire against Bangladesh a country they helped to get independence?? What is the logic...what does India gain from it...do you see any economical benefit India gains by conspiring against Bangladesh?? You also mean to say that India shouldn't have interfered in Bangladesh issue in 1971....that makes you a hard core Jamat supporter...
1. Who are these people? Either they are "Human rights activists" who protest against what they perceive as violations of human rights of any group, anywhere, or they happen to be Muslims who support Palestine because of religion.
Why do 'secular' Indians poke their dirty nose in the domestic affairs of Bangladesh?
2. Episodes of 1905, 1947 can not be forgotten. There are a multitude of reasons why India might conspire against Bangladesh. That discussion is irrelevant because that is not the topic. Discuss on topic.
3. Yes, very much. If there is a 'weak' Bangladesh (economically, militarily etc) in its Eastern flank, your beloved country will not have to spend much resources to carry out its nefarious activities in Bangladesh as it does in Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Maldives, to name a few places.
A strong Bangladesh would go against the strategic interests of "Republic of India" (and its delusions of grandeur fed by its megalomaniac dreams of radical Hindutva statehood in the form of "Akhand Bharat" or terrorist states like "Ram Rajya").
4. Ridiculous argument suited for illiterate Indian masses. Whatever party I do or do not support is to be determined at polls, in national elections in BANGLADESH, nothing to do with India or Indians.
Also, Indians interfered in 1971 only to break up its arch-rival and sworn enemy into two so that it can gain 'unchallenged military supremacy' in the South Asian region (quoting official Hindutva-radical governmental publications). None of it was out of humanitarian concerns.
3. Trust me .... the only person who needs to be ignored is YOU.
I can not trust you. This statement of yours is proof enough.
If you had ignored me, you only needed to avoid quoting me.
Given the unsophisticated argumentation put forth by you, I have also decided to put you, along side many of your compatriots on my ignore list. At least, the threads in the BD subforum will be less of an eyesore.