Hindu temple vandalized in Rangamati Bangladesh

[Abu Shaleh Rumi]

Well, it was a robbery not religious violence. Nobody was around when this happened...

 

[ChennaiDude]

Absolutely agree destroying religious structures is wrong ,

but what should be done if a religious structure is destroyed and another religious structure is built over it ?

is it wrong to destroy it or is it correction ?

You know what the answer is going to be from @AfrazulMandal - Its ok to Destroy Hindu Idols and educate the Hindus what they should not be praying to stones- etc.

 

[Rusty]

Absolutely agree destroying religious structures is wrong ,

but what should be done if a religious structure is destroyed and another religious structure is built over it ?

is it wrong to destroy it or is it correction ?

first you have to prove that the religious structure was destroyed in the first place.
fairy tales on whatsapp does not count.

second, even if it did happen (which it certainly didn't) but even if it did, it happened so long ago that the new structure is now part of the history.

How many temples were built on top of stupas and even earlier religions?


your people's obsession with fairy tales has gotten so insane that you are now actually killing humans over them and destroying historic buildings.

 

[ChennaiDude]

You don't wanna learn from lessons, your problem.

No no- Both communities need to learn from History- No one religion is better than the other!- (Let me dumb it down a bit- I want to talk to GOD- Phones available- Apple/Samsung/LG--etc etc- hope you get the jist.- Dont get me wrong Islam is absolutely a great way to reach out to GOD, so is Hinduism as well)

 

[AfrazulMandal]

so is Hinduism as well

You are free to hold on to your thoughts.

 

[ChennaiDude]

You are free to hold on to your thoughts.

I know I am- Any doubt!

 

[Hiptullha]

Why are Pakistanis trying to be performatively woke here?? You know these people don't care about the sanctity of your religious structures. They'll just claim the mosque was a Ram mandir and bulldoze it. They already think the Vatican and Kaabah were both mandirs so don't expect them to think your masjid would be any different.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

Why are Pakistanis trying to be performatively woke here?? You know these people don't care about the sanctity of your religious structures. They'll just claim the mosque was a Ram mandir and bulldoze it. They already think the Vatican and Kaabah were both mandirs so don't expect them to think your masjid would be any different.

Even if they cared, it should not matter.

Hindu temples (from a theological pov) should not matter to any Muslim. Offer sympathy at most for the hurt and move on.

 

[lightoftruth]

first you have to prove that the religious structure was destroyed in the first place.
fairy tales on whatsapp does not count.

second, even if it did happen (which it certainly didn't) but even if it did, it happened so long ago that the new structure is now part of the history.

How many temples were built on top of stupas and even earlier religions?


your people's obsession with fairy tales has gotten so insane that you are now actually killing humans over them and destroying historic buildings.

We proved it to our Supreme Court for us that's what matters.
So the point since it happened a long time ago the status quo should remain justice should not happen is just stupid, You may not have heard a phrase that Justice delayed is justice denied.
I m fine if everyone's original structure gets rebuilt by demolishing the new one if proven in court , are you ?

 

[Hiptullha]

I m fine if everyone's original structure gets rebuilt by demolishing the new one if proven in court , are you ?

No one here cares about what your H judges say. It's not proof to us of anything.

 

[Rusty]

We proved it to our Supreme Court for us that's what matters.
So the point since it happened a long time ago the status quo should remain justice should not happen is just stupid, You may not have heard a phrase that Justice delayed is justice denied.
I m fine if everyone's original structure gets rebuilt by demolishing the new one if proven in court , are you ?

ah yes, the kangaroo court that is the Indian supreme court.
Tell me, on which basis did your courts prove it?
It certainly wasn't scientific or factual.
https://thewire.in/history/babri-masjid-asi-excavation-ayodhya-ram-temple

"If you read the entire report, there is no mention of any temple. It is a standard report. …What is missing is a chapter on bones and human skeletal remains. That is what they also found but they never published it.

What you will also find is that the names of the people who wrote those [other] chapters is mentioned. But in the conclusion, there is no name mentioned. And in the conclusion, in the last paragraph of the report, they say that given the evidence of this western wall, and pillar bases, and some architectural fragments, there was a temple underneath the Babri Masjid. It is literally written in three lines. Otherwise, nowhere in the discussion, is there any talk of a temple being found. With the same evidence, we have interpreted that there were actually two or three phases of smaller mosques underneath the Babri Masjid."



Of course, the second that court makes a judgement against you, you would be out here condemning it as an unreliable court.

So again, you have not proven any temple ever existed.

As for your stupid last comment, what a retarded thing to say.
Children think like that.
There are 1000 year old mosques in Spain that have been converted or destroyed. No Muslims are foaming at the mouth demanding to destroy the new structures and rebuild the mosques.

Your ideology is that of a child, you have such simplistic and child like view.
With Millions of you guys unable to find wives, I guess its no surprise that you will fall for childish thoughts and behaviors.

 

[xeuss]

ah yes, the kangaroo court that is the Indian supreme court.
Tell me, on which basis did your courts prove it?
It certainly wasn't scientific or factual.
https://thewire.in/history/babri-masjid-asi-excavation-ayodhya-ram-temple

"If you read the entire report, there is no mention of any temple. It is a standard report. …What is missing is a chapter on bones and human skeletal remains. That is what they also found but they never published it.

What you will also find is that the names of the people who wrote those [other] chapters is mentioned. But in the conclusion, there is no name mentioned. And in the conclusion, in the last paragraph of the report, they say that given the evidence of this western wall, and pillar bases, and some architectural fragments, there was a temple underneath the Babri Masjid. It is literally written in three lines. Otherwise, nowhere in the discussion, is there any talk of a temple being found. With the same evidence, we have interpreted that there were actually two or three phases of smaller mosques underneath the Babri Masjid."



Of course, the second that court makes a judgement against you, you would be out here condemning it as an unreliable court.

So again, you have not proven any temple ever existed.

As for your stupid last comment, what a retarded thing to say.
Children think like that.
There are 1000 year old mosques in Spain that have been converted or destroyed. No Muslims are foaming at the mouth demanding to destroy the new structures and rebuild the mosques.

Your ideology is that of a child, you have such simplistic and child like view.
With Millions of you guys unable to find wives, I guess its no surprise that you will fall for childish thoughts and behaviors.

You're wasting your time with these SanghiNazis.

All they want is to see Muslims suffer, and their depravity is such that they get sheer joy out of it. Depraved products of a depraved society.