What's new

Hezbollah: We were the LAST ones to intervene in Syria

Syrian Lion

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
7,264
Reaction score
3
Country
Syrian Arab Republic
Location
Syrian Arab Republic
Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah recent speech, talked about Hezbollah being the last group who entered the war, there were many other parties and groups such as the Mostakbal (Future movement) and other parties and organisations who entered Syrian war.

Nasrallah: "With all honesty, we don't send our men to Syria and pretend and say that we are giving milk and bed sheets in Syria, and if they died bury them in Syria, and mute their families in Lebanon ( such as Mostakbal terrorists). When we go to any battle, there is a responsibility, vision, a clear task. We don't like this battle (Syria) we like the other battle ( against Israel)".
_________________________________________________________________________________

My comment:

Basically Nasralla said that Hezbollah didn't intervene until Qusayr battle, (especially when the villages in Lebanon got attacked by terrorists F$A). It is funny how the whole world got upset when Hezbollah entered, but no one said a word when thousands of terrorists entered Syria, and the world knows it. so why is it okay for terrorists from all over the world come to assiststerrorists F$A, but when Hezbollah enters ONE BATTLE it is a crime?
At least Hezbollah doesn't lie and hide it, Hezbollah is brave enough to admit, unlike other governments and parties who send terrorists and hide the truth when its obvious...
__________________________________________________ ________________________________
Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah on Friday defended his party’s intervention in Syria’s two-year long war, accusing Western and Arab governments of hypocrisy for sending arms and fighters to prop up rebels.

In a televised speech marking Wounded Veterans Day, Nasrallah said the firestorm of condemnation that erupted among Arab governments and their Western backers over Hezbollah's participation in the Syrian conflict has nothing to do with their opposition to the principle of foreign intervention as they claim.

“The problem is not about interference,” he said, charging the United States and Israel with supporting Islamist extremists who travel from outside Syria to join the fight. “Imagine [their reactions] if we intervened in Syria in support of the opposition,” Nasrallah added, implying that the West would approve.

“There are Arab countries which don’t have elections or democracy, or [meaningful] constitutions that are sending weapons and fighters,” he said in reference to the medieval, US-backed regimes in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the Syrian opposition's main backers.

The claim that they want democracy and freedom “is the lie of the armed opposition, which is causing all the bloodshed ... in Syria.”

Hezbollah’s support of the Syrian army has helped tip balance of power in its favor. An untold number of Hezbollah forces fought alongside Syrian troops to retake the strategic city of Qusayr in a two-month long offensive that was declared a victory earlier this month.

But the powerful Shia movement’s intervention in Syria has further polarized an already fragile and divided Lebanon. Syria-related violence has escalated in bordering Lebanon over the past several weeks with frequent rocket attacks from Syria, and deadly clashes between residents in the northern city of Tripoli.

The group’s local critics say interference in Syria’s conflict endangers Lebanon, while Hezbollah supporters say the radical Islamists fighting to overthrow President Bashar al-Assad pose the greatest threat to Lebanon’s security.



Nasrallah accuses West of hypocrisy over Syria | Al Akhbar English
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nasralla even spoke of there should be reform and other changes needed in Syria in politics which i also say is needed and support it , he even said so how can he be wrong , he says things honestly and his view are not radical

i read a article where it is said that the Christians was happy to see hezbollah in Syria Al-Qusair city after liberate
people should ask why??

He is saying he is not interested in this war but he is doing it if Al Qaeda comes to power then all finished more country and people will suffer

Al Qaeda are the same people who are getting support from USA and Arab World this are the same people who carried out 911 and other terrorist acts to many race and religion

and SAA / Assad / Syria did not carry out terrorist act or threatened or invaded any country, so why this ???

Hezbollah are not like other that kills because they are not from same religion
they respect and honour other religion
 
Nasralla even spoke of there should be reform and other changes needed in Syria in politics which i also say is needed and support it , he even said so how can he be wrong , he says things honestly and his view are not radical

i read a article where it is said that the Christians was happy to see hezbollah in Syria Al-Qusair city after liberate
people should ask why??

He is saying he is not interested in this war but he is doing it if Al Qaeda comes to power then all finished more country and people will suffer

Al Qaeda are the same people who are getting support from USA and Arab World this are the same people who carried out 911 and other terrorist acts to many race and religion

and SAA / Assad / Syria did not carry out terrorist act or threatened or invaded any country, so why this ???

Hezbollah are not like other that kills because they are not from same religion
they respect and honour other religion

most puppet countries hate Hezbollah because he is anti-Israel, imagine if Hezbollah was pro-Israel, would have any one spoke against them? of course not...
 
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. Hz will not fool us again, they are going down.

yeah that's why you still believe Alayabieyh news after the embarrassment it caused you here in the forum, where your credibility BURNT WITH TWO POSTS :omghaha:
Grad missile ha? :laughcry:

I m at a loss. Tell me one thing.

Why can every other country in the region promoting Western agenda can interfere in syria and why cant Hezbullah intervene to defend against this aggression?

Hezbollah doesnt defend the Western Zionists cause, like other "Arab" puppets... terrorists were sent to Syrian since the first days of the conflict... and no one said a word...
 
I m at a loss. Tell me one thing.

Why can every other country in the region promoting Western agenda can interfere in syria and why cant Hezbullah intervene to defend against this aggression?

You'll not get convinced unless you search for it yourself. I don't expect you to change your views. We live in this region, yet, we know much better, we are not fools.
 
You guys are so much against Hezbullah, fine. But tell me one thing, do you Arabs have balls to confront Israel? NO you dont. You are cowards.

Arabs have confronted israel in the past, and I don't think it would be effective to do so now. Which Arabs are you referring to?
 
Hezbollah actually is the FIRST foreign militia to intervene this conflict. There weer some private volunteers so far, but Hez is first to intervene as organization.
 
You guys are so much against Hezbullah, fine. But tell me one thing, do you Arabs have balls to confront Israel? NO you dont. You are cowards.

Sorry man, we aren't savage to attack another country. However, if war is being imposed on us, we will fight.
 
Back
Top Bottom