Well frankly to us, religion is more important than ethnicity and if someone of same ethnicity is with a different religion, we see them as outsiders. So its kind of ethno religious combination.
Now how did he take KPK forever when there is not even 1℅ sikhs?? The sikhs mostly fought for their lands as lahore was taken multiple times by pashtuns and even amritsar was destroyed.
Your last paragraph summarizes it well. So this is the reason we see brits and even mughals as thugs but u happily served the brits and accepted them as masters, served them and upto some extent still their loyal servant. Weird how u see muslims as thugs but sikhas and brits as ur masters. But again u explained the mentality of slaves so cant do much with slaves. Still same slave mentality ppl are our military and govt leaders, what can we expect from them other than "foeget the past and move on" type comments.
No bro i dnt get triggered so easily. Also seems u dont know much, lar o bar Afghan is an Afghanistan propaganda after partition, pashtuns of east have always been separate from Afghanistan after ahmed shah abdali. There have been wars between pashtuns of current Pakistan and Afghanistan. These wars took place in bajaur, dir. So ur assertion that whoever talks of pashtuns are Afghanistan supporters is wrong, that one idiot even mentioned ANA to me lolz. Let me tell u, if pashtuns of Pakistan wanted to be part of Afghanistan then no punjabi, sindhi, sikh, Christian or brit could have stopped us, it was wish of pashtuns to stay away from Afghanistan. The relations were poisoned especially after Afghanistan struck a deal with brits and let the pashtuns of Pakistan alone to face the brits. We still kept fighting till 1947.
Am not surprised to see u using same language as indians. Read history and ull know who are slaves. Pashtun lodhis ruled india before mughals. We didn't even accept mughals as rulers n kept fighting. Remember that famous birbal? Well he was killed in a war with pashtuns. We didnt accept Turkics, whom u proudly wave as ur ancestors but actually made u slaves. We didnt accept the brits, n kept fighting, remember why churchil was posted here?? From Britain to USSR to US, u should have some idea abt who easily becomes slave and who fights forever.
As far as aid from US and britain is concerned, i have no idea and dont care. Ur thinking that am an Afghanistan supporter is wrong n shows how little u know. Maybe Afghanistan puppet govt got more aid but Pakistan unpuppit govt got got something too right? Billions of dollars flowing in mush era. Or was that halal aid?
Punjabis have a a rich warfare past.Jats aside,you need to learn about the gureilla warfare of ghakkars and pothowaris and what even Multanis have doen in past.
though i dont agree with his point on ranjeet singh,who is not a hero to us..i absolutely laugh off your selection bias on pashtun history.
When it comes to ANA u say they are farsiban. you cant run away from the facts the real composition of of pashtuns in ANA.
To give the military a national character, the Afghan army now has ethnic quotas for officers: 40-45 percent Pashtun, 30-35 percent Tajik, 10-12 percent Hazara and 8-10 percent Uzbek and other groups, according to Gen. Mohammad Zahir Azimi, a spokesman for the Defense Ministry.
Afghan Soldiers Seen As Outsiders In Crucial Southern Region; Many Don't Speak The Language
www.cbsnews.com
Total pashtun rule over subcontinent is not more than 150 years in total .the irony was other than Abdali none of the other pashtun leaders had the political caliber to run a state and they fell in 10 to 30 years time'.
Its funny when you say you never accepted Turkic as masters.... Turkics rounded up budhist pashtuns and converted them to islam. Read Kitab ul Hind by Beruni or Tareekh al Sistan..They as well as the jats fought for Ghaznavid and Ghori army. It doesnt matter what pashtuns like you think when events on ground tell a different story.The Lodis fought with Mughals and Sher Shah Suris coup d etat was a pure political thing and had nothing to do with burden of past.
Then you single out punjabis as slaves of Brits
Shah Shujah ,grand son of Abdali, Dost Muhammad, Abdu rehman they were all salves of British..Only Sher Ali was a free man (thanks to his teacher jamal u din Afghani)
Abdu Rehman Khan turned Afghanistan in to a British protectorate for his rule, thats just one step below what other princely states of subcontinent were. Brits and Tsar Russians agreed to make Afghanistan a buffer zone as they didnt want to meet on a new frontier and engage in a new war therefore both sides agreed on making their territories protectorates(Bokhara on Russian side and Afghanistan on British side).The truth is Afghans won a few battles like the battle of gandamak or battle of Maiwand but it was always the british that prevailed in the end in all 3 wars.. the so-called afghan invincibility is a myth. You should be thankful to punjabi Army generals like Zia who have helped Afgans fighters re-build confidence and root out invaders and also build a general Pakistani narrative on Pakthun bravery among us that helps a Pakistani sleep well at night that their western borders are in good hands...Nothing is invincible in this world. Everything is about perception and strategy.
p.s Faqir of ipi later admitted of being led astray by Kabul govt. and became loyal to Pakistan..Tehre is h a road by his name in Islamabad.
