What's new

Heinous Jamaat War Criminals Arrested

"blasphemy" in general term "is irreverence toward holy personages, religious artifacts, customs, and beliefs."

From purely legal point of view:
---------------------------------------------
Neither of these arrested Jamaat leaders made any statement to commit "blasphemy". But some other city Jamaat leader made speech while back which is base of Awami regime arrest.
Can a City Jamaat leader say any such thing without getting nod from his war criminal leader, Nizami? What the city man said in public has sure been uttered mamny times in private to appease Nizami. Without Nizami's silent nod this city leader would not have dared to utter such blasphemy. How ridiculus you Jamaatis are! 

So, Nizami is certainly guilty of association even if he was not heard of saying those words. He should be punished according to Islamic law.
 
.
my question was where is the connection
Cheers!!!

Does there have to be a connection?

My personal opinion about you and my legal analysis are completely separate.

Quit changing the subject and address the issues in posts #33 and #39

In fact you even write like an Indian.
 
.
Can a City Jamaat leader say any such thing without getting nod from his war criminal leader, Nizami? What the city man said in public has sure been uttered mamny times in private to appease Nizami. Without Nizami's silent nod this city leader would not have dared to utter such blasphemy. How ridiculus you Jamaatis are! 

So, Nizami is certainly guilty of association even if he was not heard of saying those words. He should be punished according to Islamic law.

This is not sufficient evidence to arrest someone let alone convict and jail them.
 
.
Quit changing the subject and address the issues in posts #33 and #39


Get real MBI....and go through the whole thread again....

I did not question your post# 33, 39 or anything about the arrest....but your claim to call members to have "mock Islam" and upon asking you, you said the answer is in those posts....

Where is it??



Cheers!!!
 
.
Get real MBI....and go through the whole thread again....

I did not question your post# 33, 39 or anything about the arrest....but your claim to call members to have "mock Islam" and upon asking you, you said the answer is in those posts....

Where is it??

Cheers!!!

Answering question with another question is indian trait.

Now for you there were multiple question to rpove your previous claims but instead of answering and providing proof you are talking trash like headless chicken dont know what to do.

As said before your contribution in this forum is just rant and spread propaganda for indian interest.
 
.
Answering question with another question is indian trait.

Newton's fouth law of motion...??? :azn:

Now for you there were multiple question to rpove your previous claims but instead of answering and providing proof you are talking trash like headless chicken dont know what to do.

As said before your contribution in this forum is just rant and spread propaganda for indian interest.

Did you forget to take your lesson from post# 29 or shall i repost it for you....??? :coffee:


Cheers!!!
 
Last edited:
.
Get real MBI....and go through the whole thread again....

I did not question your post# 33, 39 or anything about the arrest....but your claim to call members to have "mock Islam" and upon asking you, you said the answer is in those posts....

Where is it??



Cheers!!!

By making irrelevant comments on Jamaat and Islam is a mockery when the real issues are legal. By ignoring the legal aspect you are in fact simply mocking Islam since it is entirely irrelevant in determining guilt in these cases. The real issue is procedural and has nothing to do with Islam or blasphemy which will come up during trial. If the arrest and interrogation are illegal there should not be a trial and the case should be summarily dismissed.
 
.
By making irrelevant comments on Jamaat and Islam is a mockery when the real issues are legal. By ignoring the legal aspect you are in fact simply mocking Islam since it is entirely irrelevant in determining guilt in these cases. The real issue is procedural and has nothing to do with Islam or blasphemy which will come up during trial. If the arrest and interrogation are illegal there should not be a trial and the case should be summarily dismissed.


So ultimately there is a connection isnt it MBI....?? But you said...

Does there have to be a connection?

Personality disorder??? :azn:

By making irrelevant comments on Jamaat and Islam

So you mean Jamaats are angels that commenting on them is insulting Islam???

And, who in this thread made irrelevant comments on Islam....care to post it???


Cheers!!!
 
.
Newton's fouth law of motion...??? :azn:
Did you forget to take your lesson from post# 29 or shall i repost it for you....??? :coffee:

Cheers!!!

You give lesson to people that is oxymoronic and pure entertainment:rofl:

Show proof of your claim first before harping like indian chapabaz.
 
. . . .
Killing of Intellectuals in '71
Cops to quiz Mojahid, Saidur face-to-face

Jamaat-e-Islami Secretary General Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojahid will be brought face to face with detained militant kingpin Saidur Rahman for interrogation in connection with the killing of intellectuals in 1971.

It will be done to verify Saidur's claim that the Jamaat leader had often boasted at party meetings that he was one of the masterminds behind the brutal murders of the intellectuals.

The Daily Star got to know about it yesterday from a top police official who would not be identified talking about the matter.

Saidur, chief of Jama'atul Mujahideen Bangladesh, is now on remand in a case filed with a Narayanganj police station and will soon be brought to the capital.

A former ameer of Habiganj district Jamaat, he has also told interrogators that Mojahid at different meetings of Jamaat high-ups used to say he had actively participated in the killings.

Police arrested Saidur, his wife and three other leaders of the banned Islamist outfit in the city and Narayanganj on May 24 and May 25.

Saidur took over as JMB chief after the arrest of Abdur Rahman in February 2006.

Hailing from Kujagaon under Bahubal upazila of Habiganj, he got involved in Islami Chhatra Shibir in 1977. He was the president of Moulvibazar Shibir between 1978 and 1980, police sources said.

In 1983, he was made ameer of Habiganj Jamaat.

Meanwhile, investigators yesterday started quizzing Mojahid and Nayeb-e-Ameer Delwar Hossain Sayedee in a case filed with the Paltan police station in February for violence and obstructing the work of the law enforcers.

Sub-inspector Zillur Rahman, investigation officer (IO) of the case, took the two to the Minto Road office of the Detective Branch at around 4:00pm.

The Jamaat leaders were in Dhaka Central Jail since being placed on 16 days' remand in five cases on Wednesday.

The previous day, police arrested them along with Jamaat Ameer Motiur Rahman Nizami in a case filed for hurting religious sentiment of the Muslims.

The IO however did not take Nizami to DB office for quizzing.

“The jail authorities have told me that Nizami is sick and would not be sent for interrogation,” he said adding that if the Jamaat chief feels better tomorrow he too would be taken for interrogation.

Replying to a query, Zillur said the Jamaat leaders were taken to the DB office as the Paltan police station lacked sufficient accommodation facilities.

ARRESTS IN LAST THREE DAYS
Law enforcers have rounded up 365 Jamaat-Shibir activists from across the country in last three days, said sources at the police headquarters.

Of them, 121 were arrested on Tuesday, 128 Wednesday and 116 till 3:00pm yesterday
Cops to quiz Mojahid, Saidur face-to-face
 
.
Shun war criminals: Tuku to Shibir

Dhaka, July 1, (bdnews24.com) —The state minister for home has called upon Islami Chhatra Shibir which supports Jamaat-e-Islami, to not be on the side of war criminals in the opposition party.

Shamsul Hoque Tuku urged them to revive democratic principles within its organisation. Shibir has been protesting the arrest of top Jamaat leaders on Tuesday.

The junior home minister told journalists on Thursday the present generation Shibir did not come out of Chhatra Sangha, which was the former student body of Jamaat.

"There is no reason for them to support the war criminals," he said.


They were brought up as Bangladeshis and thus should grab this opportunity, said Tuku indicating the government's resolve against the fundamentalist party.

BNP's statement in favour of the arrested Jamaat leaders indicates that it is trying to save war criminals, he said.

"We knew that they will support the war criminals."


The BNP has condemned the arrest of top three leaders including Jamaat's chief Matiur Rahman Nizami and secretary general Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed who have already been remanded in police custody in a raft of cases.

Regarding the protest programme of Jamaat, Tuku said, "They are giving threats for long. They are threatening from even before the war crimes trials process took off."

They should be aware that the pro-liberation quarters cannot be subdued easily, he added.

"They will be stopped if they are involved in any anti-state activities."

The law-enforcing agencies are at a maximum alert, he said.

About the apprehension of anarchy during the protest procession of Jamaat, the inspector general of police Nur Mohammad said they did not fear any such thing but were prepared for any situation that might arise.
Shun war criminals: Tuku to Shibir | | bdnews24.com
 
.
Posts #33 and #39 are where you will find my arguments which you have ignored. Everything else you have written is just India dalali rubbish.

And you guys are what ? Pakistani Dallals?

Al-Zakir is a known Razakar and so is idune
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom