healthy indo-pak relationship

[KS]

as kasuri say last week only few days and issue was solved.beleve me or not there is an understanding between both gov abut kashmir and it will solve one day i hope so.there is some thing under the table and it will come out.which is acceptable for alll.

hoping for it

we are not hungery of indian land and we even no need any land from you.its an issue not a case of land.

same with us....WE DONT WANT UR LAND..at the same time..WE DONT WANT TO LOOSE EVEN AN INCH OF OUR LAND.


So the only possibl solution meeting this criteria is conversion of LOC into IB....

It is accepatable to us Indians.. for u Pakistanis..?

 

[KS]

Western diplomats, speaking on condition of anonymity, say Indian intelligence is believed to be in contact with the Baluchi separatists, though it's unclear if they provide any support.

U r providing this as a credible link to support the claim..?

 

[jagjitnatt]

U r providing this as a credible link to support the claim..?

Get used to it. If possible some would even quote from
www.I-hate-India.com

 

[T-Faz]

U r providing this as a credible link to support the claim..?

So you want him to blurt it all put and harm the whole WOT scenario, do not act like an innocent angel who knows nothing, it is a fact that India supported Baloch rebels. Also what about the afghani official saying that one of the people to die in the attack was a RAW agent. What was he doing there, helping afghanis. The role of agencies is to use situations to its advantage and this is being done so.

If you continue to do so, there are many insurgent groups in India that can be supported once US leaves Afghanistan.

 

[jagjitnatt]

So you want him to blurt it all put and harm the whole WOT scenario, do not act like an innocent angel who knows nothing, it is a fact that India supported Baloch rebels. Also what about the afghani official saying that one of the people to die in the attack was a RAW agent. What was he doing there, helping afghanis. The role of agencies is to use situations to its advantage and this is being done so.

If you continue to do so, there are many insurgent groups in India that can be supported once US leaves Afghanistan.

The agent was in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is not Balochistan.

India and Pakistan both have their agents in each other's countries.
Agents aren't for show off. They are for espionage. This is their job. This doesn't prove India's involvement in Balochistan.

 

[!!craft!!]

^^^

I am only concern about bolded part (your so called Idea) ... Mate back up your claims with a piece of credible source that the India melding in Balucshitan but if you dont have one, then cut your crap ...

regards
Jailer

brother this aint crap which i am posting ..there aint smoke withouth a fire???it it this is a respected forum with members trying to discuss present issues if you cant face facts, post related to the topicand mind your self then go some where else ...as for your source google it youll find tons of it...last but not the least use your brains while posting not your testosterone...

 

[!!craft!!]

That is only possible after a respectable solution of Kashmir Dispute.

not before that................[/Q

no offence but can you please be more specific about the kashmir dispute... what shoud both countries do to solve it...

 

[T-Faz]

The agent was in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is not Balochistan.

India and Pakistan both have their agents in each other's countries.
Agents aren't for show off. They are for espionage. This is their job. This doesn't prove India's involvement in Balochistan.

So what about the ones who enter Pakistan as refugees,

Pakistan asserts an arrest of Indian RAW agent from Balochistan

The truth is clear, you are just trying to save yourself becuase RAW is ineffective and always get caught with its hands open.

 

[jagjitnatt]

So what about the ones who enter Pakistan as refugees,

Pakistan asserts an arrest of Indian RAW agent from Balochistan

The truth is clear, you are just trying to save yourself becuase RAW is ineffective and always get caught with its hands open.

I admit we have agents in Pak, but even Pak has agents in India.
Agents from both side get caught now and then.

But what I want to say is that it is not a proof of India's involvement in Balochistan insurgency.

How exactly is India involved? Since you seem to advocate your point so strongly, you might have some info on it.

What is India doing? How is it causing insurgency in Balochistan? What sort of support is provided by India to BLA?

 

[KS]

So you want him to blurt it all put and harm the whole WOT scenario, do not act like an innocent angel who knows nothing, it is a fact that India supported Baloch rebels.

Du u even know that the US gives $*** about wat Pakistan thinks in the WOT.If they want Pakistans help they will get it..Whether ur country wants or doesnt want..they ll get it.Thats the reality.
How will it affect the WOT if the admit Indias role..?India is not currently providing any troops to fight the insurgency.

India is giving aid to Afghanistan and that will continue even if Unkil doesnt like it. So the US doesnt have any prima-facie standing on this Issue vis-a-vis India.

Also what about the afghani official saying that one of the people to die in the attack was a RAW agent. What was he doing there, helping afghanis. The role of agencies is to use situations to its advantage and this is being done so.

U urself have given the explanation.It is the RAW interest in consolidating in Afg.Even Afg officials dont oppose RAW presence in Afg.Why it bothers u..?If ur concerned abt alleged Indian activities in Balochistan do watever u want to secure ur border.Dont blame us.

If you continue to do so, there are many insurgent groups in India that can be supported once US leaves Afghanistan.

Ur welcome my friend.But pls remember that this is a game that TWO can play.

 

[xman]

well as an india my idea would be that india should disengage form baluchistan ..as a initial step...

this is a very unhealthy quote. as an Indian, if you are, refrain yourself from posting such baseless and unauthenticated and illogical comments.

 

[xman]

So what about the ones who enter Pakistan as refugees,

Pakistan asserts an arrest of Indian RAW agent from Balochistan

The truth is clear, you are just trying to save yourself becuase RAW is ineffective and always get caught with its hands open.

the link you posted only says that , your government BELIEVES, which means they are NOT SURE.
When we catch your agents, we have proofs, while Pakistan never does.

 

[Isaq Khan]

guys plese list out the initiatives so as to improve the indo pak relationship... there were no diffrences in us ,but its we who have created them...


well as an india my idea would be that india should disengage form baluchistan ..as a initial step...

Are u for real?????

what we have to do with Baluchistan?????????

And how u come to the conclusion that we are same people?????????

Everyone has 2 eyes, 2 hands, 2 legs, 1 nose is that your idea of same people then everyone on this planet is same.

we have not attacked Pakistan they have attacked India in 48, 65, 71, 99 friendship is not in our hands they have to do it.

Also, don't talk about friendship because every time we take a step something wrong happens.

AB Vajpayee gone to Lahore = Kargil

Dr. Manmohan Singh in shram al sheikh = 26/11 Mumbai attack

now what u want another 26/11 or Kargil??????

 

[T-Faz]

Are u for real?????

what we have to do with Baluchistan?????????

And how u come to the conclusion that we are same people?????????

Everyone has 2 eyes, 2 hands, 2 legs, 1 nose is that your idea of same people then everyone on this planet is same.

we have not attacked Pakistan they have attacked India in 48, 65, 71, 99 friendship is not in our hands they have to do it.

Also, don't talk about friendship because every time we take a step something wrong happens.

AB Vajpayee gone to Lahore = Kargil

Dr. Manmohan Singh in shram al sheikh = 26/11 Mumbai attack

now what u want another 26/11 or Kargil??????

Unfortunately your governemtn has been threatening Pakistan for the last 60 years and you have been told that angelic India only wants friendship.

Perhaps you should read this.

March 1987: A. Q. Khan Says Pakistan Has Nuclear Weapons, then Retracts Claims
Edit event

A. Q. Khan.A. Q. Khan. [Source: CBC]A. Q. Khan, father of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons program, tells an Indian reporter that the program has been successful (see 1987). “What the CIA has been saying about our possessing the bomb is correct,” he says, adding, “They told us Pakistan could never produce the bomb and they doubted my capabilities, but they now know we have it.” He says that Pakistan does not want to use the bomb, but “if driven to the wall there will be no option left.” The comments are made during a major Indian army exercise known as Brass Tacks that Pakistanis consider a serious threat, as it is close to the Pakistani border. In fact, at one point the Indian commanding general is reported to consider actually attacking Pakistan—an attack that would be a sure success given India’s conventional superiority. According to reporter Seymour Hersh, the purpose of the interview is “to convey a not very subtle message to the Indians: any attempt to dismember Pakistan would be countered with the bomb.” This interview is an embarrassment to the US government, which aided Pakistan during the Soviet-Afghan War, but has repeatedly claimed Pakistan does not have nuclear weapons (see August 1985-October 1990). Khan retracts his remarks a few days later, saying he was tricked by the reporter. [New Yorker, 3/29/1993]

Entity Tags: Seymour Hersh, Abdul Qadeer Khan, Central Intelligence Agency

Timeline Tags: A. Q. Khan's Nuclear Network

With your generals repeating the same thing over and over again of attacking Pakistan and doing this (Cold start) and doing that (Two front war). We cannot really do anything other than return the favour of 'friendship' that you so often proclaim.

You give what you get.

 

[chachachoudhary]

brother this aint crap which i am posting ..there aint smoke withouth a fire???it it this is a respected forum with members trying to discuss present issues if you cant face facts, post related to the topicand mind your self then go some where else ...as for your source google it youll find tons of it...last but not the least use your brains while posting not your testosterone...

Buddy, where exactly do you reside in Mumbai? Let us meet someday. I am planning a Mumbai trip very soon.

Now back to the topic, India-Pakistan relations can improve only when a "REAL" civilian govt takes over and army gets fully under the control of civilian govt.

Mr. Vajpayee was almost close to achieving this goal. Why on earth Pakistan backstabbed only god knows.