Hasina's Delhi tour postponed

[Species]

Really ? this is what the world bank says

''Since 2009, however, the Multiple Mixed Reference Period has also been used in the collection of consumption data. The methodology is closer to best international practice''

Get that, doofus ?

And where does it say that hybrid?

Here is the stat from WB,

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAY?locations=BD-IN

Bangladesh: 18.5 (2010)
India: 21.23 (2011)

 

[gslv mk3]

And where does it say that hybrid?

Here is the original report half-Pakistani. read up, hybrid

https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/25078/9781464809583.pdf

 

[Species]

Here is the original report half-Pakistani. read up, hybrid

https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/25078/9781464809583.pdf

Here is the methodology given with the figures, black monkey,

"In October 2016, the World Bank released estimates of global poverty from 1981 to 2013 based on 2011 PPP. The new poverty estimates combine Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) exchange rates for household consumption from the 2011 International Comparison Program with data from more than one thousand household surveys across 138 countries in six regions, and 21 other high income countries."

http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/home.aspx

 

[gslv mk3]

In October 2016, the World Bank released estimates of global poverty from 1981 to 2013 based on 2011 PPP. The new poverty estimates combine Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) exchange rates for household consumption from the 2011 International Comparison Program with data from more than one thousand household surveys across 138 countries in six regions, and 21 other high income countries.

What does that have to do with the methodology used by NSSO, bongoloid clown ?

 

[Species]

What does that have to do with the methodology used by NSSO, bongoloid clown ?

That's the methodology used to count people living below $1.9 a day madrassi monkey, not your disillusioned MMRP.

 

[extra terrestrial]

Here is the original report half-Pakistani. read up, hybrid

https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/25078/9781464809583.pdf

Well, if you really took a quote from this publication, you should give the relevant page number and para as well. That's a rule of providing a source.

 

[gslv mk3]

That's the methodology used to count people living below $1.9 a day madrassi monkey, not your disillusioned MMRP.

Genius, MMRP is a method for collecting data on consumption expenditure .ie, household surveys. You're becoming more & more deranged day by day. Nothing better can be expected from a sub-human bongoloid.

Well, if you really took a quote from this publication, you should give the relevant page number and para as well. That's a rule of providing a source.

Pg 49

 

[extra terrestrial]

Genius, MMRP is a method for collecting data on consumption expenditure .ie, household surveys. You're becoming more & more deranged day by day. Nothing better can be expected from a sub-human bongoloid.



Pg 49

Thanks for the page number. The quote is taken from the section "India’s poverty numbers"

The exact text is,

In addition, the poverty estimates for
India at the global poverty line are historically
based on the Uniform Reference Period
consumption aggregate, which involves
a 30-day recall among respondents in the
recording of all items of consumption. For
2011/2012, this implies a poverty rate of
21.2 percent at the US$1.90 poverty line.
Since 2009, however, the Multiple Mixed Reference Period has also been used in
the collection of consumption data. The
methodology is closer to best international
practice. It relies on recall periods among
respondents of 7, 30, and 365 days, depending
on the items of consumption. If the consumption
estimate derived from the latter
methodology had been used to estimate India’s
poverty rate, the result at the US$1.90
poverty line would have been a substantially
lower 12.4 percent in 2011/2012. The application
of the methodology is still being
tested. Its adoption would eventually lead to
a substantial downward revision of the poverty
numbers in India.

What the text is implying is that since 2009, the Indian experts have also been using the Multiple Mixed Reference Period (MMRP) model to estimate the consumption data for India, apart from the globally accepted method, which shows significant differences among the estimates (the global method shows poverty rate of 21% while MMRP shows 12%). According to these experts, MMRP method gives more accurate estimates and should be adopted by the World Bank to calculate the poverty headcount for all the nations. But the MMRP model is still under evaluation and yet to be adopted as the global methodology.

The figures shown by Species are directly from World Bank which is based on the global methodology uniformly used for all nations. Until the MMRP is adopted as the global methodology, we should go by the figures officially published by World Bank if we are to compare poverty rates of different countries...

 

[Species]

Thanks for the page number. The quote is taken from the section "India’s poverty numbers"

The exact text is,

In addition, the poverty estimates for
India at the global poverty line are historically
based on the Uniform Reference Period
consumption aggregate, which involves
a 30-day recall among respondents in the
recording of all items of consumption. For
2011/2012, this implies a poverty rate of
21.2 percent at the US$1.90 poverty line.
Since 2009, however, the Multiple Mixed Reference Period has also been used in
the collection of consumption data. The
methodology is closer to best international
practice. It relies on recall periods among
respondents of 7, 30, and 365 days, depending
on the items of consumption. If the consumption
estimate derived from the latter
methodology had been used to estimate India’s
poverty rate, the result at the US$1.90
poverty line would have been a substantially
lower 12.4 percent in 2011/2012. The application
of the methodology is still being
tested. Its adoption would eventually lead to
a substantial downward revision of the poverty
numbers in India.

What the text is implying is that since 2009, the Indian experts have also been using the Multiple Mixed Reference Period (MMRP) model to estimate the consumption data for India, apart from the globally accepted method, which shows significant differences among the estimates (the global method shows poverty rate of 21% while MMRP shows 12%). According to these experts, MMRP method gives more accurate estimates and should be adopted by the World Bank to calculate the poverty headcount for all the nations. But the MMRP model is still under evaluation and yet to be adopted as the global methodology.

The figures shown by Species are directly from World Bank which is based on the global methodology uniformly used for all nations. Until the MMRP is adopted as the global methodology, we should go by the figures officially published by World Bank if we are to compare poverty rates of different countries...

LOL, I was trying to say the same thing. Hope now that madrassi ape @gslv mk3 got a clarification.

 

[gslv mk3]

What the text implying is that since 2009, the Indian experts have also been using the Multiple Mixed Reference Period (MMRP) model to estimate the consumption data for India, apart from the globally accepted method, which shows significant differences among the estimates (the global method shows poverty rate of 21% while MMRP shows 12%). According to these experts, MMRP method gives more accurate estimates and should be adopted by the World Bank to calculate the poverty headcount for all the nations. But the MMRP model is still under evaluation and yet to be adopted as the global methodology.

Nopes, it the reverse. MMRP method is more close to the accepted international practice.

http://www.thehindu.com/news/nation...all-in-indias-poverty-rate/article7727591.ece

LOL, I was trying to say the same thing. Hope now that madrassi ape @gslv mk3 got a clarification.

You are such a moron, you uncivilized sub-human bongoloid.

 

[extra terrestrial]

Nopes, it the reverse. MMRP method is more close to the accepted international practice.

Perhaps, you need to read the texts yourself carefully. The MMRP model is still being evaluated by World Bank and yet to be adopted. It could be "the accepted international practice" (or not), the point is it's only the opinion of the experts who use the method...

 

[Bilal9]

তোমরা বোঝো না। ইন্ডিয়া কে বাংলাদেশ থেকে একশো গুন ভালো স্বীকার না করলে ওর পেটের ভাত হজম হবেনা।

ঠিকমতো প্রোটিন পেটে না গেলে এরকম ডেলুশন হওয়া স্বাভাবিক।

 

[extra terrestrial]

তোমরা বোঝো না। ইন্ডিয়া কে বাংলাদেশ থেকে একশো গুন ভালো স্বীকার না করলে ওর পেটের ভাত হজম হবেনা।

ঠিকমতো প্রোটিন পেটে না গেলে এরকম ডেলুশন হওয়া স্বাভাবিক।

Eder reasoning ability khub beshi kom... eta dhong kore naki asholei ei obostha ek Allah e jane tobe shobar shamne je nijeke bekub banaitase eta shotti...

When someone really has a poor comprehension ability, it really makes the whole discussion annoying...

 

[gslv mk3]

Perhaps, you need to read the texts yourself carefully. The MMRP model is still being evaluated by World Bank and yet to be adopted. It could be "the accepted international practice" (or not), the point is it's only the opinion of the experts who use the method...

It was vetted by world bank in two of their reports released in 2015. And will be adopted soon, probably starting from 2017.

তোমরা বোঝো না। ইন্ডিয়া কে বাংলাদেশ থেকে একশো গুন ভালো স্বীকার না করলে ওর পেটের ভাত হজম হবেনা।

ঠিকমতো প্রোটিন পেটে না গেলে এরকম ডেলুশন হওয়া স্বাভাবিক।

I could've told you that regional languages are to be used only in members club, but translation for Bengali can be found easily.

The point is that your compatriots & you yourself have this particular inferiority complex which makes them claim that Bangladesh is 100 times better than India, even if it is way behind. That's the reason why you lots make claims like 'Indian OPVs are junk' when your own naval shipbuilding industry is primitive.

When someone really has a poor comprehension ability, it really makes the whole discussion annoying...

What's more annoying is when people start bringing their prejudices to discussion. Like claiming that India's largest engineering company is a bunch of con men

 

[extra terrestrial]

It was vetted by world bank in two of their reports released in 2015. And will be adopted soon, probably starting from 2017.

The point is it's not adopted yet and is used in only the figure for India... That makes it foolish when you use it to compare with figures of other countries...