What's new

Has Kepler Discovered an Alien Megastructure?

thesolar65

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
4,922
Reaction score
-12
Country
India
Location
India
NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope is tasked with finding small, rocky worlds orbiting distant stars. However, exoplanets aren’t the only thing Kepler can detect — stellar flares, star spots and dusty planetary rings can also pop up in the mission’s observations.

But there’s also been speculation that Kepler may have the ability to detect more than natural phenomena; if they’re out there, Kepler may also detect the signature of artificial structures orbiting other stars. Imagine an advanced civilization that’s well up on the Kardashev scale and has the ability to harness energy directly from its star. This hypothetical alien civilization may want to construct vast megastructures, like supersized solar arrays in orbit around their host star, that could be so big that they blot out a sizable fraction of starlight as they pass in front.

13 Ways to Hunt Intelligent Aliens

When Kepler detects an exoplanet, it does so by sensing the very slight dip in starlight from a given star. The premise is simple: an exoplanet orbits in front of star (known as a “transit”), Kepler detects a slight dimming of starlight and creates a “lightcurve” — basically a graph charting the dip in starlight over time. Much information can be gleaned from the lightcurve, such as the physical size of the transiting exoplanet. But it can also deduce the exoplanet’s shape.

Normally the shape of an exoplanet isn’t particularly surprising because it’s, well, planet-shaped. It’s round. The physics of planetary formation dictate that a planetary body above a certain mass will be governed by hydrostatic equilibrium. But say if Kepler detects something that isn’t round. Well, that’s when things can get a bit weird.

For the most part, any dip in star brightness can be attributed to some kind of natural phenomenon. But what if all possibilities are accounted for and only one scenario is left? What if that scenario is this object appears to be artificial? In other words, what if it’s alien?

In a chilling article written by Ross Andersen of The Atlantic, at first glance, it seems we may be at this incredible juncture.

GALLERY: How Aliens Can Find Us (and Vice Versa)

A star, named KIC 8462852, has been found with a highly curious transit signal. In a paper submitted to the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, astronomers, including citizen scientists from the Planet Hunters crowdsourcing program, report: “Over the duration of the Kepler mission, KIC 8462852 was observed to undergo irregularly shaped, aperiodic dips in flux down to below the 20 percent level.”

The research paper is thorough, describing the phenomenon, pointing out that this star is unique - we’ve seen nothing like it. Kepler has collected data on this star steadily for four years. It’s not instrumental error. Kepler isn’t seeing things; the signal is real.

“We’d never seen anything like this star,” Tabetha Boyajian, a postdoctorate researcher at Yale University and lead author, told The Atlantic. “It was really weird. We thought it might be bad data or movement on the spacecraft, but everything checked out.”

The Planet Hunters volunteers are depended on to seek out transits in Kepler’s stars in the direction of the constellation Cygnus. This is a huge quantity of data, from over 150,000 stars in Kepler’s original field of view, and you can’t beat the human eye when identifying a true dip in starlight brightness. The Planet Hunters described KIC 8462852 as “bizarre,” “interesting” and a “giant transit.” They’re not wrong.

ANALYSIS: Could Kepler Detect Alien Artifacts?

Follow-up studies focus on two interesting transit events at KIC 8462852, one that was detected between days 788 and 795 of the Kepler mission and between days 1510 to 1570. The researchers have tagged these events as D800 and D1500 respectively.

The D800 event appears to have been a single transit causing a star brightness drop-off of 15 percent, whereas D1500 was a burst of several transits, possibly indicating a clump of different objects, forcing a brightness dip of up to 22 percent. To cause such dips in brightness, these transiting objects must be huge.

dnews-files-2015-10-alien-civilization2-670x440-151014-jpg.jpg


The transit data for KIC 8462852, featuring the obvious transit features D800 and D1500.
Boyajian et al.
The researchers worked through every known possibility, but each solution presented a new problem. For example, they investigated the possibility of some kind of circumstellar disk of dust. However, after looking for the infrared signal associated with these disks, no such signal could be seen.

Also, the star is a mature F-type star, approximately 1.5 times the size of our sun. Circumstellar disks are usually found around young stars.

ANALYSIS: Alien ‘Star Engine’ Detectable in Exoplanet Data?

The researchers also investigated the possibility of a huge planetary collision: could the debris from this smashup be creating this strange signal? The likelihood of us seeing a planetary collision is extremely low. There is no evidence in data taken by NASA’s Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) that a collision happened, creating a very tiny window of opportunity between WISE’s mission end and the beginning of Kepler’s mission (of a few years) for an astronomically unlikely cosmic event like this to occur.

The only natural explanation favored by the researchers seems to focus on an intervening clump of exocomets.

“One way we imagine such a barrage of comets could be triggered is by the passage of a field star through the system,” write the researchers.

Indeed, they argue, there’s a nearby star that might have tidally disturbed otherwise dormant comets in the outermost regions of the KIC 8462852 star system. This small star is located around 1,000 AU from KIC 8462852 and whether it’s a binary partner or an interstellar visitor, its presence may have caused some cometary turmoil. Like the other scenarios, however, the exocomet explanation still falls short of being fully satisfactory.

This research paper focuses only on natural and known possible causes of the mystery transit events around KIC 8462852. A second paper is currently being drafted to investigate a completely different transit scenario that focuses around the possibility of a mega-engineering project created by an advanced alien civilization.

ANALYSIS: Our Super-Advanced Alien Neighbors are Missing

This may sound like science fiction, but our galaxy has existed for over 13 billion years, it’s not such a stretch of the imagination to think that an alien civilization may be out there and evolved to the point where they can build megastructures around stars.

“Aliens should always be the very last hypothesis you consider, but this looked like something you would expect an alien civilization to build,” Jason Wright, an astronomer from Penn State University, told The Atlantic.

Indeed, hunting down huge structures that obscure the light from stars is no new thing. The Search for Extraterrestrial Technology (SETT) is one such project that does just this. Only recently, a survey of the local universe focused on the hope of detecting the waste heat generated by a technologically advanced civilization, specifically a Type II Kardashev civilization.

On the Kardashev scale, a Type II civilization has the ability to utilize all the available energy radiating from a star. Using a vast shell or series of rings surrounding a star, a Dyson sphere-like structure may be constructed. This has the effect of blotting out the star from view in visible wavelengths, but once the solar energy has been used by the alien civilization, the energy is shifted to longer wavelengths and likely lost as infrared radiation.

ANALYSIS: Could We Detect an Alien Civilization’s Waste Heat?

This recent search for aliens’ waste heat drew a blank, reaching the conclusion that as there appears to be no alien intelligence cocooning stars to harvest their heat, there’s likely no Type II civilization nearby.

But as KIC 8462852 is showing us, there may be something else out there — possibly an alien intelligence that is well on its way to becoming a Type II civilization, which is setting up some kind of artificial structure around its star.

Of course, these mystery transit events are nowhere near “proof” of an alien civilization. In fact, it’s barely evidence and a lot more work needs to be done.

The next step is to point a radio antenna at KIC 8462852, just to see whether the system is generating any artificial radio signals that could indicate the presence of something we’d define as “intelligent.” Boyajian and Wright have now teamed up with Andrew Siemion, the Director of the SETI Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley, to get a radio telescope to listen into the star and if they detect an artificial signal, they will request time on the Very Large Array (VLA) to deduce whether any radio signals from that star are the chatter of an alien civilization.

It might be a long shot, and the phenomenon is more likely a clump of comets or some other natural phenomenon that we haven’t accounted for blocking star light from view, but it’s worth investigating, especially if there really is some kind of alien intelligence building structures, or perhaps, ancient structures of a civilization long-gone, around a star only 1,500 light-years away from Earth.

@levina @Skull and Bones @AUSTERLITZ @Akheilos @Guynextdoor2 @ranjeet @SRP @45'22'
 
. .
.
Yes, I read about this peculiar star.
Astronomers Have Spotted Something Very, Very Strange Surrounding A Distant Star | IFLScience

This article gives one more explanation that a family of exocomets must have passed very close to the star, which caused them to be shredded into pieces by star's massive gravity. The debris of which are now left to orbit around the star.

That's all well and good, but about your signature.

01010111 01100001 01110011 01110100 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101001 01101101 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01110111 01101000 01100001 01110100 00001010 00001010 00001010 00001010 00001010 00001010
 
.
That's all well and good, but about your signature.

01010111 01100001 01110011 01110100 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101001 01101101 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01110111 01101000 01100001 01110100 00001010 00001010 00001010 00001010 00001010 00001010
Jungi bhai, Scratch your grey cells and decode it. ;)
Let me guess, you are not into IT.

*******
It's a binary code which says "Don't waste time", a reminder for many who should be studying and not wasting their time on net. :)
 
Last edited:
.
Jungi bhai, Scratch your grey cells and decode it. ;)

I take the spirit of the message seriously:

Translate Binary Code to Text

Don't waste unnecessary time when you can go the engineer's route and take shortcuts to maximize efficiency. It matters not how you arrived at your solution so long as you achieve the necessary results.

:partay:
 
.
Jungi bhai, Scratch your grey cells and decode it. ;)
Let me guess, you are not into IT?

*******
It's a binary code which says "Don't waste your time", a reminder for many who should be studying and not wasting their time on net. :)
Impressive :enjoy:
 
.
So, think reasonably here:

Some aliens build something around their star, first year it barely registers, 3rd year it registers a 15% drop, 5th year it registers up to 22% drop.

If this is some sort of energy harvesting complex, my peasant, inferior Earthling mind cannot comprehend why it orbits every 2 years only. Something is obviously orbiting that star and it has either devolved into a debris cloud due to gravity or....wait for it.....it has grown-pure evil from 5th element movie perhaps!!!

I dosagree with concept of Dyson sphere anyway. What's the point? At that stage of development you can just make fusion/antimatter/whatever reactors.

Bit OT but wtf...this is the best human species can offer?

For "dont waste your time" you need to write "01000100 01101111 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110111 01100001 01110011 01110100 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101001 01101101 01100101 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010"

Where's the efficiency?????
 
Last edited:
.
Jungi bhai, Scratch your grey cells and decode it. ;)
Let me guess, you are not into IT.

*******
It's a binary code which says "Don't waste time", a reminder for many who should be studying and not wasting their time on net. :)

Entirely unrelated question, are you that levina who reads news on 89.1 Radio Fm ?
 
.
Jungi bhai, Scratch your grey cells and decode it. ;)
Let me guess, you are not into IT.

*******
It's a binary code which says "Don't waste time", a reminder for many who should be studying and not wasting their time on net. :)

I already decoded it, and added a question in return. And yes, I am 'into IT', so you could say... :-)

For "dont waste your time" you need to write "01000100 01101111 01101110 01110100 00100000 01110111 01100001 01110011 01110100 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101001 01101101 01100101 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010 00001101 00001010"

Where's the efficiency?????

There is no efficiency in it for humans, binary has its practical uses, it is efficient for machines. In fact, it could be argued that binary has THE most efficiency.
 
. .
I already decoded it, and added a question in return. And yes, I am 'into IT', so you could say... :-)
I think I had misunderstood your question. You prolly meant that why is my signature appearing hyperlinked. Right?
I access PDF from my mobile and had no clue about it till I decided to switch to landscape orientation, that's when the mobile screen showed flags and signatures.
Now tell me why is it appearing hyperlinked? :what:
Entirely unrelated question, are you that levina who reads news on 89.1 Radio Fm ?
Finally!
I've often wondered that how come no one has ever asked me this question on the forum? :lol:
To answer your question, no I'm not that Levina. :)

******
Won't deviate this thread further. :)
 
Last edited:
.
I think I had misunderstood your question. You prolly meant that why is my signature appearing hyperlinked. Right?
I access PDF from my mobile and had no clue about it till I decided to switch to landscape orientation, that's when the mobile screen shows flags and signatures.
Now tell me why is it appearing hyperlinked? :what:

No, you see the binary I posted in my post was also a message in binary, in response to yours.
Also, it isn't appearing hyperlinked to me, just plain text.


Some basics of computing understanding is necessary. But just think about this in layman's terms, in binary there are only 2 characters/values 1 and 0, that can represent true or false, and physically they can represent what's happening in switches ON and OFF. That last one applies to the use of transistors. On their own, a single 0 or 1 (a bit), or the representation of one switch or transistor cannot do much.

But when you scale up, you can have 8 bits or 8 switches called a byte. To understand the power of this, the amount of permutations or combinations of the order of 0s and 1s in a byte is 256. e.g 01101101, 10101010, 00011110 and so on.
And when you scale up enough, and as technology and ability to use these things physically improves, you unlock more computational power. So these days chips might have in them 1 billion transistors, that is very powerful, and according to trends in computing power, it will increase further.

For us humans, binary seems odd, unnecessary, and hard to understand, but for computers it is great, and for our purposes of communication with computers, binary is perfect. In fact, every bit of detail you see on your computer screen, every graphical element, every picture, word, app when broken down and seen under the microscope is all represented at its lowest level in binary.

edit: an added joke

1444639507394.png
 
Last edited:
.
No, you see the binary I posted in my post was also a message in binary, in response to yours.
Also, it isn't appearing hyperlinked to me, just plain text.
Replied on whatever, didn't want to take this thread in a tangential direction. :)
 
.
Where's the efficiency?????
What you need is the theory of computation. This is a good book. It will show you how computer actually works as a state machine, which is the scientific name for it.
9780073191461_l.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom