Has India Proved Churchill Wrong?

[harpoon]

Would India be better off today if it still flies Union Jack? Of course.

There won't be as many poor and destitute. The gov would care more about its people than build up a military for warmongering purposes.

Would Taiwan be better off flying Chinese flag? Yes of course..instead of spending billions on defense against China, why can't Taiwan just become part of China. Your country is neither recognized by many in the world..so it doesn't matter to the world community either.

 

[Rig Vedic]

Indians are in debt to the British for creating their nation. If British lost a battle here or there to the french or Portuguese, then Indian subcontinent would not divided into 2 countries by religion, but into several countries by colonialism and princely states.

Without the Brits what would have happened is that most of India would have been united by the Marathas, with perhaps the Sikhs controlling United Punjab.

 

[IND151]

Would India be better off today if it still flies Union Jack? Of course.

There won't be as many poor and destitute. The gov would care more about its people than build up a military for warmongering purposes.

we build forces and take care of people at same time

we have lifted millions out of poverty till now

According to a new poverty Development Goals Report, as many as 320 million people in India and China are expected to come out of extreme poverty in the next four years, while India's poverty rate is projected to drop to 22% in 2015.[5] The report also indicates that in Southern Asia, however, only India, where the poverty rate is projected to fall from 51% in 1990 to about 22% in 2015, is on track to cut poverty in half by the 2015 target date.[5]

http://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&rc...vrSJBg&usg=AFQjCNGaaXKsArnEhuE10E5F_F6BMWpHlw

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

Would India be better off today if it still flies Union Jack? Of course.

Would Hong Kong have been better off still being part of UK?

There won't be as many poor and destitute.

Judging the famines during British rule, there won't be many poor or destitute, but this thought should be sufficient for you salivate all day on your lewd fantasies of dead Indians.

The gov would care more about its people than build up a military for warmongering purposes.

I guess you probably consider it blasphemy that nation like India to even have a military to defend it self .Considering the deviant sense of Stockholm syndrome derived inferiority towards imperialists has coerced your cognitive abilities and left you cognitively impaired for accepting the fact that state like India actually should/can be independent , can/should have a military to protect itself and should not be a colony of your imperial prophets.

 

[Tshering22]

Churchill was 100% right about our politicians though. We proved him dead right there. At least the C**tgrass party and its band of loser slaves did so in the last 50 years.

 

[faithfulguy]

Would Hong Kong have been better off still being part of UK?



Judging the famines during British rule, there won't be many poor or destitute, but this thought should be sufficient for you salivate all day on your lewd fantasies of dead Indians.



I guess you probably consider it blasphemy that nation like India to even have a military to defend it self .Considering the deviant sense of Stockholm syndrome derived inferiority towards imperialists has coerced your cognitive abilities and left you cognitively impaired for accepting the fact that state like India actually should/can be independent , can/should have a military to protect itself and should not be a colony of your imperial prophets.

Judging from your personal attacks instead of debating the point, you are trying to change the subject.India should focus on its poor and destitute instead of trying to be a neo-colonialist and dreaming of having so many white servants.

India in 2030!!!!!!!! - YouTube