Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As I recall he got booted out in the second term.
He was not a good politician but was good in terms of moral boost for soldiers in WW2. Hence his favouritism. He was not a good PM and was not that good in terms of politics. He got kicked out quickly admired his patriotism but not his policies.
That is because he was the leader of the British Empire the biggest thieving imperialist nation the world has ever seen. In his case it took one to know one.
he wished Partition upon the subcontinent. "The mere mention of India," he writes, "brought out a streak of unpleasantness or even irrationality in Churchill.
The prime minister 'launched into a most terrible attack on the 'baboos', saying that they were gross, dirty and corrupt.
"Well, if our poor troops have to be kept in a sweltering, syphilitic climate for the sake of your precious unity, I'd rather see them have a good civil war.' "
Churchill: “Before we pro*ceed fur*ther let us get one thing clear. Are we talk*ing about the brown Indi*ans in India, who have mul*ti*plied alarm*ingly under the benev*o*lent British rule?
Churchill hated India so these comments need to be looked at in this context:
Why Churchill had an aversion to India - Times Of India
Churchill was right, this is why India is now regarded by many as a Failed state
Each and every Indian is contributing to this corruption. Hiding real income tax by distributing family income among the members, doesn't even matter if the family member is a 7-8 year old kid. In this way, you don't have to pay the actual income tax, while having record for every penny spent/earned in the family.
There are loopholes in our judicial systems for the rich's to exploit, and do you know India is among the most highly taxed nation in the world?
Churchill is a great leader and statesman. He rally England against luffwaff onslaught and prevailed. Though his British empire never lasted one thousand years as he wanted, he was a patriot. India would benefit to have a leader like him.
But I would say that an Indian with a European waitress is doing a better job than any the billion Indians.
Churchill didn't anticipated that an European waitress would take over to prove him partially wrong.
Thank you for your assessment of India. India cannot become better unless Indians first admit that the country is a failed state.
.As a result, a large portion of people do not even know or care about the position of the candidate
This result in a failed democracy as you see in India.
Democracy also has its draw backs in the US and Taiwan. However, these two countries at least do not have a large portion of its citizens voting base on the candidate that provides the most immediate and tangible needs to buy the vote.
Indians are in debt to the British for creating their nation.
If British lost a battle here or there to the french or Portuguese, then Indian subcontinent would not divided into 2 countries by religion, but into several countries by colonialism and princely states.
Churchill is still right, India is still lost in transaction````but one thing he wouldnt know was that the level of Indian delusion
Churchill is still right, India is still lost in transaction````but one thing he wouldnt know was that the level of Indian delusion
Churchill is still right, India is still lost in transaction````but one thing he wouldnt know was that the level of Indian delusion