What's new

Harvard professor among three charged with lying about Chinese government ties

So 8 sentences of word and NOT A SINGLE REFERENCE anywhere.

How could someone defeated this "my word is truth and I don't need reference"?
You can say "Xi is 6 ft tall and can bout around everyone" and since you have said that, that must be true right? LOL

As I said, I am not into circle jerk, especially with you, so unless you come back with something other than "your word" I am not going to waste my time on here anyway.
No Chinese students funded by NSF, DOE, DOT, or even DOD??? lol... as I was one of million of them... There is NO citizenship requirement for NSF research grant:
https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=HX3AevbgkasC&pg=PA235&lpg=PA235&dq=NSF+fund+supports+CHINESE+STUDENTS&source=bl&ots=KDK9TXlv6P&sig=ACfU3U0k11Su7RUh3F1dR7Cd8LeP4zR6fA&hl=zh-CN&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiLwtjSvdPnAhXEwzgGHR8KDd84ChDoATAAegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=NSF fund supports CHINESE STUDENTS&f=false

Little kid, you keep showing you are a moron here...lol...
BTW, let me telling you another fact: millions of scientific articles with Chinese students being the first authors are funded by NSF alone. You idiot should think about it instead of keeping B.S. here...
 
Last edited:
. .
No Chinese students funded by NSF, DOE, DOT, or even DOD??? lol... as I was one of million of them...And why should they bitch so much about here:
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=0ce7780c-de07-432e-b135-2e43b63230f3
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-18 PSI Staff Report - China's Talent Recruitment Plans.pdf

Little kid, you keep showing you are a moron here...lol...

First of all, I was not denying US government have joint program with Chinese government. That is not the claim here. You claim is "MAJORITY of Chinese grad student in US were funded by US government", even in your "reference" they only purpose that Chinese Researcher were defrauding the US government for funding.

In the Senate Statement it stated in page 54

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-11-18 PSI Staff Report - China's Talent Recruitment Plans.pdf

NIH admitted that at least 75 individual are linked to China's Foreign Talent Recruitment Plan out of 50,000 applicant

In page 59 pin pointed 250 individual who are directly have a conflict of interest. Those are't all Chinese researcher though

Now, I don't know what's your definition of "Majority" 75 or 250 out of 50,000 applicant to the grant are not exactly a large number that would be allow to called "Majority" Also, all US government funded grant are listed, so you can check it against what is the post graduate student in that college and what are the Percentage of Chinese researcher and you can see how "Majority" were the Chinese researcher under US funding.

By the way, the 2 link you linked is actually one reference, the first one is reporting the senate finding (which is the second link) on how Chinese student defrauding the US government.

Once again proving that China is absolutely nothing without America.
Be respectful, you are talking to a PhD holder with 2 years post doc in the US.

PhD in gangsterism, i supposed? Or by PhD maybe he meant this video at 2:27? Then I have no answer for what post doc mean...


LOL
 
.
Lol...What I see 'my own people' here is keeping exposing your BS here...
And you have to ask me why I know so much about American universities, while you know nothing, because I got my PHD from an American university and did 2 year postdoc there before I came back 9 years ago... and I myself was funded by the NSF grant and several other grants from US departments, through my 4 year PHD study + 2 year postdoc.. Similar cases for the majority of my fellow Chinese classmates/colleagues. You know nothing about PHD students and American universities.. Just like I do not know much about universities in AU, but what I heard a lot is that Universities in AU admit international students mainly for the tuition, they seldom provide full funding for international students unlike American universities... This might be the reason you can not believe American universities using government funds to support Chinese students, and you could not even believe professors pay ~$2,000 monthly stipend to us in addition to the tuition, out of their research money essentially from the US government...Or you are just too ignorant...

similar to my story.

So 8 sentences of word and NOT A SINGLE REFERENCE anywhere.

How could someone defeated this "my word is truth and I don't need reference"?
You can say "Xi is 6 ft tall and can bout around everyone" and since you have said that, that must be true right? LOL Yeah, 6 years post doc and you sounded like a overly patriotic teenager. What did you specialize in your "PhD"? Modern Swearing? LOL If you are 6 year post doc, then I am actually Scott Morrison. LOL

By the way, you know you can check NSF grant, right? Those aren't exactly top secret information you know.

https://www.nsf.gov/funding/

As I said, I am not into circle jerk, especially with you, so unless you come back with something other than "your word" I am not going to waste my time on here anyway.

Nothing in your link contradicts what he said.

In fact the MIT link showed only 8% were unfunded.

You did not read the links or read it and was unable or unwilling to understand.
 
.
similar to my story.



Nothing in your link contradicts what he said.

In fact the MIT link showed only 8% were unfunded.

You did not read the links or read it and was unable or unwilling to understand.

He made several claim, the first claim he made is that most, if not all of the Post Grad student were supported by RA (Specifically RA, because that is where he made his point of Research Funding, aka government money), which is where the MIT article comes in.

After this, he claim Majority, if not all of Chinese Post Grad student were funded by the US government. That, from his own reference, turn out not to be true.

He then claim himself was a NSF Post Doctoral Candidate. Well......I want to believe him, but judging by the way he wrote, the way he communicate with his point, I very much doubt that.
 
.
He made several claim, the first claim he made is that most, if not all of the Post Grad student were supported by RA (Specifically RA, because that is where he made his point of Research Funding, aka government money), which is where the MIT article comes in.

After this, he claim Majority, if not all of Chinese Post Grad student were funded by the US government. That, from his own reference, turn out not to be true.

He then claim himself was a NSF Post Doctoral Candidate. Well......I want to believe him, but judging by the way he wrote, the way he communicate with his point, I very much doubt that.

Most graduate students are supported in some way, either RA or TA. This is all government funding.
 
.
Most graduate students are supported in some way, either RA or TA. This is all government funding.

TA paid come from the University itself, not Government funded. I am a TA with Macquarie Uni. Even so RA position weren't government funded.

He specifically mentioned US government pay Chinese Student. So I just go over the figure in term of RA position,
 
.
similar to my story.
Yes, lots of memories, great country to some extent, generally nice people... However, some trolls and azz-lickers here are really annoying...
Nothing in your link contradicts what he said.

In fact the MIT link showed only 8% were unfunded.

You did not read the links or read it and was unable or unwilling to understand.
We are talking about some common sense to anyone who have ever lived/studied in the US, but this idiot keep B.S. here like a moron...lol...
He made several claim, the first claim he made is that most, if not all of the Post Grad student were supported by RA (Specifically RA, because that is where he made his point of Research Funding, aka government money), which is where the MIT article comes in.

After this, he claim Majority, if not all of Chinese Post Grad student were funded by the US government. That, from his own reference, turn out not to be true.

He then claim himself was a NSF Post Doctoral Candidate. Well......I want to believe him, but judging by the way he wrote, the way he communicate with his point, I very much doubt that.
I got back from the USA almost 10 years ago, what kind of writing should you expect from me? If you mean the manner I talk/write as a PHD, then I have no nice words to trolls/azzlickers here, and here is this professor from PKU who has something to say about white azzlickers from HK like you, not a big fun of him, but what he said is exactly right about you azzlickers:
 
Last edited:
.
I got back from the USA almost 10 years ago, what kind of writing should you expect from me? If you mean the manner I talk/write as a PHD, then I have no nice words to trolls/azzlickers here, and here is this professor from PKU who has something to say about white azzlickers from HK like you, not a big fun of him, but what he said is exactly right about you azzlickers:

Yes, yes, yes, you got back from the US 10 years ago, you are a PhD holder.

I don't have any question about it LOL. I mean, if you want to be like that, so be it. I don't think it's against any law to claim to be a PhD holder. So why should I care? I am just saying, if you speak (or in this case, write) like a dumbass, you act like a dumbass, in all likelihood, you are a dumbass.
 
.
Yes, yes, yes, you got back from the US 10 years ago, you are a PhD holder.

I don't have any question about it LOL. I mean, if you want to be like that, so be it. I don't think it's against any law to claim to be a PhD holder. So why should I care? I am just saying, if you speak (or in this case, write) like a dumbass, you act like a dumbass, in all likelihood, you are a dumbass.
Phd holder or not, no one cares whatever a fuxking azz-licker believes... The only thing you azz-licker believe is your master's azzhole tastes like honey...lol...
 
.
Phd holder or not, no one cares whatever a fuxking azz-licker believes... The only thing you azz-licker believe is your master's azzhole tastes like honey...lol...

Oh well...…..

As I said, it's not me claim to be this or that, so you must have wanted someone to believe something or make some kind of "validation" to be making tall claim like this. First of all, I don't ever believe in any claim on an anonymous forum like this one. Second of all, as I said, if you speak like a dumbass, you act like a dumbass, in all likelihood, then you are on.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom