What's new

Happy Independence Day Bangladeshis!

^^^
Bharti, 71, Mujib, Awami and crocodile tears as if we are that fool to understand the mindset of Bharti.
 
.
^^^
Bharti, 71, Mujib, Awami and crocodile tears as if we are that fool to understand the mindset of Bharti.

:rofl: someone got the burn!!!

Listen loser, your extremist view is the one Mujib wanted to root out at that time but he couldn't but this time Hasina will surely do that. You hate father of the nation, you hate Hindus though there are tens of millions of them in BD, you hate BD's national anthem and its writer, you hate the country, this is no less than those were killing people of Bangladesh in 71.

People of BD wants fast trial of all those razakars.
 
.
:rofl: someone got the burn!!!

Listen loser, your extremist view is the one Mujib wanted to root out at that time but he couldn't but this time Hasina will surely do that. You hate father of the nation, you hate Hindus though there are tens of millions of them in BD, you hate BD's national anthem and its writer, you hate the country, this is no less than those were killing people of Bangladesh in 71.

People of BD wants fast trial of all those razakars.

Bharti make me laugh. Really. :lol::rofl::rofl:
 
.
Bharti make me laugh. Really. :lol::rofl::rofl:

Not just laugh you will cry!!!!

There is not a single person in this forum who will claim to hate the national anthem of his own country, now you call yourself Bangladeshi!!!! You got extremist hatred towards people of other religion. You hate your own country. People like you are dangerous for any country.


No! Mujib was coward. He surrendered to Pak army with the safe exchanged of his ugly family and his behind while leaving the innocent east Pakistanis to withstand the wrath of army. I hate the bastard. He was also half Hindu.



I still do because he was against the establishment of Dhaka university and I personally hate them damn song. It's a disgraced that our national anthem written by a Hindu and anti Muslim character. Only Bengali minded people like him because their blood is diluted with Bengaliat.



I agree because there is no space for Tagore song as our national anthem but we have too many munafiqs cowards lurking around. I am sorry about this reality.
 
.
o. c'mon cut it off everyone it's not even funny.:tdown:
Go out and have some Pizza.
 
. . .
Bangladesh’s independence day
Posted on March 26, 2011

By Mohammad Jamil

Pakistan and Bangladesh are bound together by faith, common heritage and culture, and shared values of love and passion for peace. In fact, All India Muslim League was founded at Dhaka in 1906, which later became a driving force behind the creation of Pakistan under the leadership of Quaid-i-Azam. Unfortunately, Pakistan was dismembered due to international intrigue – India being on the frontline – and also due to the flawed policies of the government vis-à-vis formation of One-Unit, policy of parity between East and West Pakistan and strong-centre syndrome.


Such contradictions have existed in many countries of the world, which are resolved through dialogue, but India was instrumental in stoking the contradictions to make them irreconcilable. Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf said the other day that Pakistan government should apologize for the atrocities committed by Pakistan military on Bengalis. Imran Khan is our national hero and a legend. But he should realize that Pakistan was in a state of war in 1970. Pakistan faced rebellion and many Punjabis, Pathans, Urdu-speaking migrants from India were also slaughtered by militants incited and backed by India.

However, we must admit for the excesses made by the politicians, political leaders, civil and military bureaucracy from 1947 to 1970. In other words, we as an entire nation were responsible for the raw deal given to former East Pakistanis. First of all, Bengalis were not given their due share in government jobs. In accordance with the British standards, their low height, narrow shoulders and small chests did not qualify them for their induction in the army, yet they were recruited in Navy and Air Force. They were in majority with 53 per cent population yet they were treated as minority. When they protested for their rightful share, provinces of West Pakistan were joined to form into One Unit, and formula of parity was floated. In 1970 elections, Awami League emerged as a single majority party, and Yahya Khan had convened National Assembly at Dacca to hand over power to the majority party. But at the last moment, he postponed the assembly session without giving any alternate date, which created doubts in their minds about the government’s intentions of disregarding the aspirations of the people of former East Pakistan.

However, there is realization on both sides that foreign powers also played ignominious role in dismemberment of the motherland. People of Pakistan and Bangladesh have now forgotten bitterness of the past and are determined to move forward and play their role for peace and prosperity in the region. We congratulate Bangladesh and wish it all the very best on its independence day. After Bangladesh became an independent country, it has excelled in human development index when compared with India and Pakistan. Indeed, there is a lesson from the dismemberment of Pakistan. You cannot appeal to the reason of the people for unity and cohesion on the basis of religion or cultural heritage. To create unity and harmony between the people of a state, the policies must be predicated on equality and fair play; equitable development of regions and socio-economic justice must be ensured; and democratic rights of the people must be respected. It is encouraging to note that institutions and political parties vying inflicted with the strong centre syndrome and unitary form of government now stand for devolution of authority. During the last three decades, Bangladesh has made strides in many fields; especially its success in introducing micro-finance (Garameen Bank of Bangladesh) to help people in starting their own business and improving literacy rate, has established a paradigm for other developing countries to emulate and benefit from the success story of Bangladesh. Muslims of the undivided India including people of East Bengal had struggled for a separate homeland in order that they could live according to their own way of life and without domination by the brute Hindu majority. And they were successful in creating Pakistan – a beacon of hope for the Muslims of the subcontinent and beyond. But on 16th December 1971, Pakistan was dismembered through an international intrigue and pernicious designs of India whose leadership had never accepted the partition of the sub-continent and creation of Pakistan in 1947. India had hoped that Bangladesh would remain grateful to India for its help in creation of Bangladesh. But people of Bangladesh have maintained their identity as a Muslim nation proving the claim of the then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi who had declared that the two-nation theory had drowned in the Bay of Bengal. Anyhow, Bangladesh does not want to do someone else’s bidding be it India or any other country. America has been trying to persuade Bangladesh to send combat troops to Afghanistan arguably contrived by American and Indian intelligence agencies to deny Pakistan any role after America and allied forces withdraw from Afghanistan. Bangladesh leadership understood the Indo-US game plan and made it clear that it would not send troops to Afghanistan. “Bangladesh will not send soldiers to Afghanistan,” Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had told a meeting of ruling Awami League’s advisory council in Dhaka last year. Several foreign policy experts in Bangladesh had also expressed reservations against sending combat forces to Afghanistan. The then foreign secretary of Bangladesh Faruque Chowdhury had said: “It would be contrary to Bangladesh’s foreign policy; moreover both the countries were members of the South Asian regional grouping of SAARC and had an historic link since the medieval age”. It is a well known fact that India has thousands of its agents and commandos in Afghanistan on the pretext of providing security to the road-building and other projects it has undertaken in Afghanistan. During Awami League’s rule and especially Hasina Wajid at the helm, India always took it for granted that Bangladesh would be docile, not realizing that Bengalis have great past, and had given tough time to the British Raj – the then super power in its own right. After Bangladesh came into being, India had thought that Bangladeshis would continue to live in abject poverty, and remain subservient to India. In fact, Indian had played pivotal role in dismemberment of Pakistan, of course by taking advantage of contradiction between former East and West Pakistan.

Bangladesh has also dispute with India over river waters, because India always tried to use river waters as a lever to force other countries to acquiesce to it. The issue of border fences installed by India has in the past been another bone of contention. Ever since, in 1987 when India decided to fence some locations along Indo-Bangladesh international border, (at present 2,859 km have been fenced out of the sanctioned 3,783 kms), Bangladesh has been upset.

Bangladesh always perceived it to be ‘an unfair’ move reflective of not only India’s lack of trust towards its neighbour but also meant overlooking and disregarding what is largely considered as a historical trend of free movement across the subcontinent. Nevertheless, with the fences that were built on Indian soil with Indian resources, there was very little Bangladesh could do to stop the process. Bangladesh protested vociferously about these fences naming it as defence structures, which are not permitted between the neighbours within 150 yards from the zero line.

—The writer is Lahore-based senior journalist.
 
.
HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY!

istockphoto_8883611-bangladesh-flag-boy.jpg
 
. .
Bangladesh’s independence day
Posted on March 26, 2011

By Mohammad Jamil

Pakistan and Bangladesh are bound together by faith, common heritage and culture, and shared values of love and passion for peace. In fact, All India Muslim League was founded at Dhaka in 1906, which later became a driving force behind the creation of Pakistan under the leadership of Quaid-i-Azam. Unfortunately, Pakistan was dismembered due to international intrigue – India being on the frontline – and also due to the flawed policies of the government vis-à-vis formation of One-Unit, policy of parity between East and West Pakistan and strong-centre syndrome.


Such contradictions have existed in many countries of the world, which are resolved through dialogue, but India was instrumental in stoking the contradictions to make them irreconcilable. Chairman Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf said the other day that Pakistan government should apologize for the atrocities committed by Pakistan military on Bengalis. Imran Khan is our national hero and a legend. But he should realize that Pakistan was in a state of war in 1970. Pakistan faced rebellion and many Punjabis, Pathans, Urdu-speaking migrants from India were also slaughtered by militants incited and backed by India.

However, we must admit for the excesses made by the politicians, political leaders, civil and military bureaucracy from 1947 to 1970. In other words, we as an entire nation were responsible for the raw deal given to former East Pakistanis. First of all, Bengalis were not given their due share in government jobs. In accordance with the British standards, their low height, narrow shoulders and small chests did not qualify them for their induction in the army, yet they were recruited in Navy and Air Force. They were in majority with 53 per cent population yet they were treated as minority. When they protested for their rightful share, provinces of West Pakistan were joined to form into One Unit, and formula of parity was floated. In 1970 elections, Awami League emerged as a single majority party, and Yahya Khan had convened National Assembly at Dacca to hand over power to the majority party. But at the last moment, he postponed the assembly session without giving any alternate date, which created doubts in their minds about the government’s intentions of disregarding the aspirations of the people of former East Pakistan.

However, there is realization on both sides that foreign powers also played ignominious role in dismemberment of the motherland. People of Pakistan and Bangladesh have now forgotten bitterness of the past and are determined to move forward and play their role for peace and prosperity in the region. We congratulate Bangladesh and wish it all the very best on its independence day. After Bangladesh became an independent country, it has excelled in human development index when compared with India and Pakistan. Indeed, there is a lesson from the dismemberment of Pakistan. You cannot appeal to the reason of the people for unity and cohesion on the basis of religion or cultural heritage. To create unity and harmony between the people of a state, the policies must be predicated on equality and fair play; equitable development of regions and socio-economic justice must be ensured; and democratic rights of the people must be respected. It is encouraging to note that institutions and political parties vying inflicted with the strong centre syndrome and unitary form of government now stand for devolution of authority. During the last three decades, Bangladesh has made strides in many fields; especially its success in introducing micro-finance (Garameen Bank of Bangladesh) to help people in starting their own business and improving literacy rate, has established a paradigm for other developing countries to emulate and benefit from the success story of Bangladesh. Muslims of the undivided India including people of East Bengal had struggled for a separate homeland in order that they could live according to their own way of life and without domination by the brute Hindu majority. And they were successful in creating Pakistan – a beacon of hope for the Muslims of the subcontinent and beyond. But on 16th December 1971, Pakistan was dismembered through an international intrigue and pernicious designs of India whose leadership had never accepted the partition of the sub-continent and creation of Pakistan in 1947. India had hoped that Bangladesh would remain grateful to India for its help in creation of Bangladesh. But people of Bangladesh have maintained their identity as a Muslim nation proving the claim of the then Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi who had declared that the two-nation theory had drowned in the Bay of Bengal. Anyhow, Bangladesh does not want to do someone else’s bidding be it India or any other country. America has been trying to persuade Bangladesh to send combat troops to Afghanistan arguably contrived by American and Indian intelligence agencies to deny Pakistan any role after America and allied forces withdraw from Afghanistan. Bangladesh leadership understood the Indo-US game plan and made it clear that it would not send troops to Afghanistan. “Bangladesh will not send soldiers to Afghanistan,” Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina had told a meeting of ruling Awami League’s advisory council in Dhaka last year. Several foreign policy experts in Bangladesh had also expressed reservations against sending combat forces to Afghanistan. The then foreign secretary of Bangladesh Faruque Chowdhury had said: “It would be contrary to Bangladesh’s foreign policy; moreover both the countries were members of the South Asian regional grouping of SAARC and had an historic link since the medieval age”. It is a well known fact that India has thousands of its agents and commandos in Afghanistan on the pretext of providing security to the road-building and other projects it has undertaken in Afghanistan. During Awami League’s rule and especially Hasina Wajid at the helm, India always took it for granted that Bangladesh would be docile, not realizing that Bengalis have great past, and had given tough time to the British Raj – the then super power in its own right. After Bangladesh came into being, India had thought that Bangladeshis would continue to live in abject poverty, and remain subservient to India. In fact, Indian had played pivotal role in dismemberment of Pakistan, of course by taking advantage of contradiction between former East and West Pakistan.

Bangladesh has also dispute with India over river waters, because India always tried to use river waters as a lever to force other countries to acquiesce to it. The issue of border fences installed by India has in the past been another bone of contention. Ever since, in 1987 when India decided to fence some locations along Indo-Bangladesh international border, (at present 2,859 km have been fenced out of the sanctioned 3,783 kms), Bangladesh has been upset.

Bangladesh always perceived it to be ‘an unfair’ move reflective of not only India’s lack of trust towards its neighbour but also meant overlooking and disregarding what is largely considered as a historical trend of free movement across the subcontinent. Nevertheless, with the fences that were built on Indian soil with Indian resources, there was very little Bangladesh could do to stop the process. Bangladesh protested vociferously about these fences naming it as defence structures, which are not permitted between the neighbours within 150 yards from the zero line.

—The writer is Lahore-based senior journalist.

Cause the fissure, as the article clearly brings out by depriving the Bengalis in all respect, and then lament and blame everyone else!

What irony!

But music to the Razaakar ears!

So, India is responsible and the Bangladeshi who fought and assisted were all agents of India!

Another left handed damning of Bengalis of Bangladesh!

Rather pathetic manner to use Bangladesh's case to hit out at India!

Any link?

The writer reminds me of some of the post here that Bengalis of East Pakistan had it coming and there is no need to apologies.

The crocodile tear is of the author. How many here have wished you here for your Independence Day?
 
. .
There is not a single person in this forum who will claim to hate the national anthem of his own country, now you call yourself Bangladeshi!!!!

You are correct. I do not like current anthem because it neither represent Bangladesh nor it is writen by a Bangladeshi. It should be change asap.
 
.
You are correct. I do not like current anthem because it neither represent Bangladesh nor it is writen by a Bangladeshi. It should be change asap.

Your national anthem was written by Indian (Undivided India) i think thats your problem ??? right ?? :lol:
Then you dnt even like your Independence cause you won it because of Indian help???
 
.
Yet we love Sara Jahan se Acchha Hindusthan hamara, written by a Muslim.

As also, Nazrul Islam's poems and songs which are also a tribute to the Bengali language and it rich heritage.

Identity and culture is beyond religious narrow tunnels of blind vision.

Only those with narrow-mindedness perceives issue with the narrowness of their personal narrow experience and vision.

Bangla Bandu was an example, who was rejected by the majority.

You are correct. I do not like current anthem because it neither represent Bangladesh nor it is writen by a Bangladeshi. It should be change asap.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom