lets do good comparison then:
1. cartoons which hurt muslims are allowed but hijab isn't. because freedom can't be given to minorities but freedom can be given to hurt the religious sentiments of minorities.
2. halal food shops are forced to sell food which muslims don't eat because shop owners are muslims but non muslim shop keepers can't be forced to sell halal food to serve the whole community because muslims aren't considered the part of community.
Restricting access to Makkah and Madinah is intended to provide a place of peace and refuge for Muslim believers and preserve the sanctity of the holy cities. At this time, millions of Muslims visit the cities each year, and additional tourist traffic would simply add to the congestion and detract from the spirituality of the pilgrimage visit.
Making fun of religions or political figures is allowed.
Urging attacks on religions or political figures is banned.
Muslims want to show their numbers in public and thus apply group pressure in various ways.
Much like Hitler's SA storm troopers.
Group pressure is perhaps not appreciated.
As our french friend who lives there pointed out it is not a Halal shop.
It is a general food shop. That is what the license said.
The owner will have his day in court. if he loses, he can reopen his shop elsewhere.
If he wins, he will not be evicted until 2019, when the lease expires.
if You are going to feel butthurt, get the facts right.
Rome of course does not receive Millions of Tourists every Year?
Presence of non-Muslims destroys sanctity and detracts from spirituality?
If that is not discriminatory, nothing is...